State Still Dealing With Fallout From Bad U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

November 30, 2017 | Posted in Family, Marriage | By

According to recent news reports, the State of Arkansas is still dealing with fallout from a bad ruling the U.S. Supreme Court issued last summer.

In June the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the State of Arkansas must list two “mothers” on a child’s birth certificate if the child’s birth mother is legally married to another woman. The ruling overturned a good decision the Arkansas Supreme Court handed down last December.

The State is currently struggling to come up with a way to amend its laws and comply with the Supreme Court’s order.

As we said last summer, the U.S. Supreme Court is asking Arkansas to ignore basic facts about biology. Birth certificates exist to record that a child was born and who the child’s biological parents are presumed to be.

As the Arkansas Supreme Court correctly noted last year, no child can have two biological mothers, but the Arkansas Department of Health is being forced to operate as if that is possible.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling treats the names that appear on birth certificates like some sort of marriage benefit. Birth certificates are issued for the sake of children — not for the sake of adults. They are not simply pieces of paper. They are vital records that need to be accurate and deserve respect. We should not let them become mere political ploys in the ongoing debates about marriage.

Article Laments Shortage of Abortion Doctors in Arkansas and Elsewhere

November 29, 2017 | Posted in Abortion | By

This week Think Progress published an article lamenting the shortage of abortion doctors in Arkansas, Kansas, and elsewhere.

The article claims the stigma associated with abortion coupled with the lack of training at medical schools like UAMS is contributing to a decline in doctors who will perform abortions, saying,

The shortage of physicians who perform abortion is particularly acute in the midwest and south. Similar to Kansas, for example, there are about four full-time abortion doctors in Oklahoma. In neighboring Missouri, there are three abortion doctors. Just south of that in Arkansas, where over 1.5 million females live, there are three physicians who perform abortions. Only one performs surgical abortions and the other two perform medication abortions, where women take two drugs to terminate a pregnancy up to 10 weeks.

There are two key points the article fails to adequately consider:

  1. Abortion causes the death of an unborn child. That isn’t a political statement. It is a scientific fact. Abortion is not simply another medical procedure. It ends a human life, and that is the reason so many doctors choose not to perform abortions.
  2. Given that abortion rates are plummeting and that Arkansans generally oppose abortion, it makes sense that the number of doctors performing abortions would decline as well.

The article also misses the mark when describing the circumstances in Arkansas and our state’s pro-life policies.

For example, the article describes the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences as a medical school where abortion is taboo.

However, just 4 years ago Dr. Curtis Lowery, chairman of the OB/GYN Department at UAMS, testified against a pro-life bill Family Council supported during a legislative committee meeting.

And contrary to the article’s claims, in 1997 the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled UAMS could perform abortions, provided state tax dollars were not used to pay for the abortion procedure. Family Council was among the plaintiffs in that lawsuit against UAMS.

The article also says the Arkansas Legislature “has passed the most restrictive abortion policy in the country in recent years.” The article doesn’t say what the “most restrictive policy” is, but here are some of the things Arkansas’ newest pro-life laws do:

  1. Protect babies who survive an abortion;
  2. Prevent Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood;
  3. Ensure women are given adequate information about abortion, including its risks and alternatives;
  4. Require abortion doctors to give women at least 48 hours to review this information before deciding to have an abortion;
  5. Ensure an abortion is not performed on a minor without the consent of a parent or guardian — except in certain circumstances;
  6. Ensure abortion drugs are administered according to FDA protocols
  7. Require abortion clinics to contract with a doctor who has admitting privileges at a local hospital, in case of emergency;
  8. Prohibit abortions performed based on the unborn baby’s sex;
  9. Require doctors to request some of a woman’s medical records before performing an abortion;
  10. Prevent the sale of organs or tissue harvested from unborn babies;
  11. Require abortion clinics to be inspected at least annually, and ensure a clinic that fails inspection does not perform abortions;
  12. Prohibit some abortion procedures in which the unborn baby is dismembered;
  13. Prevent the state from awarding grants to abortion providers;

Does anyone really think a doctor ought to be able to perform an abortion without explaining the procedure to the woman first?

Shouldn’t a woman be given adequate time to consider her options before having an abortion?

And isn’t it reasonable to say abortion clinics ought to be able to pass inspection before doing abortions?

Life News probably said it best:

Abortion is wrong, immoral and reprehensible to all but the most ardent abortion supporters. Even to many who call themselves pro-choice, abortion is something to be avoided. A few doctors like those profiled by Think Progress may be willing to end unborn babies lives, but most realize the truth that the medical profession is about caring, not killing.

Photo Credit: By Rafael Alcarde Palomares (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.

It’s Official: Arkansas Cuts Medicaid Funding for Planned Parenthood

November 28, 2017 | Posted in Abortion | By

After more than two years of wrangling in court, the State of Arkansas has officially cut Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood.

In 2015 Governor Hutchinson ordered the state to quit providing Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood clinics after a series of undercover videos showed Planned Parenthood officials discussing the sale of organs and tissue harvested from aborted babies.

Following a lengthy lawsuit, a federal panel of judges ruled last August that the state has the power to cut Medicaid funds to abortion providers.

Planned Parenthood appealed that decision to the entire federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Earlier this month the Eighth Circuit said it would let that panel’s good ruling from August stand.

Last week the Eighth Circuit’s decision became final, letting Arkansas officially cut Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood.

This is a major pro-life victory.

Planned Parenthood is the nation’s leading abortion provider, and the Medicaid funding it receives from the government helps keep Planned Parenthood in business. Nobody should have to subsidize abortion providers with their tax dollars.

Governor Hutchinson and Attorney General Rutledge have worked hard to ensure the State of Arkansas doesn’t give any money to abortion providers. I am glad Arkansas has a governor who will stand up to the abortion industry — and an attorney general who will defend the right to life in court.

Photo Credit: By Brian Turner (Flickr: My Trusty Gavel) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.