Are You As Bothered As I Am About the Internet Sales Tax?

This week I ordered a $130 item on Amazon.  When my order was tallied, an extra $11 was added for Arkansas sales tax.

Thanks to legislative talk about collecting sales taxes on all Internet purchases, Amazon decided to start collecting it on their own.  Considering the fact that almost every member of the Arkansas Legislature promised no tax increases when they ran for office, aren’t you bothered that they instigated the collection of these taxes?

I’m sure some sly person will remind me that I’m supposed to pay that tax on my own anyway and that it’s not really a tax increase.   I might argue that a law few people know about, that’s never been enforced, and that suddenly takes effect feels a lot like a new law–and this one’s impact on the pocket book is the same as a tax increase.

I understand the need not to put local brick-and-mortar businesses at a disadvantage, but our lawmakers could have helped them out by decreasing the tax burden on those businesses rather than taking actions that burden good working people once again.

A.G. Rutledge Rejects Another Recreational Marijuana Proposal

Last Friday Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge rejected yet another proposed constitutional amendment legalizing recreational marijuana in Arkansas.

The proposal effectively would have let anyone 21 or older grow, buy, and use marijuana. The A.G. rejected the proposal, citing inconsistencies and ambiguities in the measure’s title and text.

By our count, Attorney General Rutledge’s office has rejected at least four recreational marijuana proposals in the past two months alone. Marijuana proponents seem bound and determined to legalize marijuana in Arkansas.

As we keep saying: The endgame for marijuana’s supporters is – and always has been – full legalization of marijuana.

You can read the A.G.’s entire opinion here.

Cutting Though the Confusion on Arkansas’ Abortion Laws

Yesterday the Huffington Post published a column regarding pro-life laws passed by the Arkansas Legislature earlier this year.

The article contains some confusion about the laws and what they do. We want to set the record straight.

First, the article’s title claims Arkansas’ new pro-life laws will require women to get permission from men before they can have an abortion. This is not true.

This title seems to be based on a debunked argument a few people tried to use against Rep. Andy Mayberry’s (R-Hensley) bill to ban dismemberment abortions earlier this year.

At the time, some abortion advocates tried to argue the bill would let the father of the unborn child sue to stop the mother from getting an abortion. This argument began popping up on websites and in emails back in February, but it was quickly debunked by people who took the time to read and understand the bill. The Huffington Post is simply recycling incorrect information.

The article also refers to H.B. 1566 by Rep. Kim Hammer (R-Benton) as a “personhood law” and says the law will force a woman to tell the father of the unborn baby she plans to have an abortion.

H.B. 1566 was not a “personhood law.” Nothing in the law says that an unborn baby is a person. And H.B. 1566 does not require women to tell anyone they plan to have an abortion, either.

Instead, H.B. 1566 does two things.

First, it prohibits research on aborted fetal remains; this will help prevent companies from buying or selling organs harvested from aborted babies.

Second, H.B. 1566 says aborted babies will be disposed of according to the Arkansas Final Disposition Rights Act of 2009. This will ensure aborted babies are respectfully buried or cremated. In the past, Arkansas law has allowed the bodies of aborted babies to be incinerated as medical waste.

H.B. 1566 does not stop a woman from having an abortion; instead it helps stop companies from buying or selling aborted baby parts, and it ensures aborted babies are treated respectfully.

The article also implies H.B. 1566 would force a woman who has been raped to consult with her attacker before she can have an abortion or bury or cremate the aborted baby. Again, this simply is not true.

H.B. 1566 doesn’t require a woman to get consent from anyone before having an abortion, and Arkansas law does not recognize the parental rights of rapists. That is something the Arkansas Legislature has worked hard to address in the past.

Unfortunately, we are seeing a lot of misinformation being shared online thanks to social media and shoddy journalism.

My advice is simple: If you want to understand Arkansas’ five pro-life laws the ACLU is challenging in court, read them for yourself. You can find links to all five of them below.

Act 603 regarding the remains of aborted babies: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act603.pdf

Act 45 regarding dismemberment abortion: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act45.pdf

Act 733 regarding sex-selection abortion: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act733.pdf

Act 1018 regarding reporting of abortions on underage girls: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act1018.pdf

Act 383 regarding the licensing and inspection of abortion clinics: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act383.pdf