#TBT 1990: Pro-Abortion Group’s Little Known Constitutional Amendment

Photo Credit: Arkansas Citizen, Volume 2, July, 1990

Twenty-nine years ago the Committee for Reproductive Choices launched a petition drive to place a pro-abortion amendment on the ballot in Arkansas.

The amendment would have made abortion a constitutional right and, in the words of one attorney, “straight-jacket” Arkansas into the most extreme abortion policy in the nation, at the time.

The amendment’s supporters included the ACLU and Advocates for Reproductive Information and Support (ARIS).

The pro-abortion amendment’s text read,

AN AMENDMENT PREVENTING STATE INTERVENTION IN REPRODUCTIVE CHOICES

Section 1. The State shall not intervene in any woman’s personal reproductive decisions, including but not limited to, the right to choose to become pregnant, to carry a pregnancy to term and to bear a child or to prevent pregnancy or to terminate her pregnancy through abortion by a licensed medical doctor through the twentyfourth (24th) week of pregnancy. The state shall not intervene in a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy to protect her life or health.

Section 2. Nothing in this provision shall restrict a person’s religious freedom.

The amendment effectively would have written the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton abortion decisions into the Arkansas Constitution.

In Roe the court ruled states had little power to restrict abortion during the first and second trimesters.

In Doe the court ruled states could not prohibit abortions deemed necessary to save the life or protect the health of the mother.

Both of these rulings were changed in 1992, when the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision that dismantled Roe‘s trimester framework and ruled states could regulate abortion as a medical procedure.

Thankfully, this pro-abortion amendment from 1990 never took root in Arkansas.

However, it serves as a reminder of how far Arkansas has come in the fight to protect unborn children.

Maine Senate Approves Anti-Electoral College Legislation

News outlets report Maine’s Senate has approved legislation that would award the state’s four electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote.

WMTW reports,

In the 2016 election, Maine split its electoral votes. Three went to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and one went to now-President Donald Trump. Maine is just one of two states to split its electoral votes, and 2016 marked the first time the split happened.

Maine’s Senate voted 19-16 Tuesday to join a pact of 14 other states that would allocate their electoral votes based on the candidate who wins the popular vote.

Abolishing the Electoral College is a terrible idea that hurts rural areas and smaller states like Arkansas.

Currently, presidential candidates must win majority votes in many different states in order to become president. This system forces candidates to campaign nationwide.

If the President of the United States were chosen by a nationwide popular vote, candidates could win the presidency by focusing on the seaboards — without campaigning in or considering the issues facing middle America.

Family Council has successfully opposed multiple efforts to award Arkansas’ Electoral Votes to the presidential candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote.

The last serious proposal abolishing the Electoral College in Arkansas was defeated in 2009.

Our friends at PragerU have published an excellent video explaining why the Electoral College is good for America. You can watch it below.

Photo Credit: Carol Boldt [CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)]