Minnesota Court Battle Shows Why Arkansas’ Law Protecting Women’s Sports Matters

On Wednesday a federal court in Minnesota heard oral arguments in a lawsuit over fairness in women’s sports.

The group Female Athletes United is challenging a Minnesota policy that lets male athletes compete in women’s athletics.

We have written many times about how male athletes have taken first place medals and podium spots away from women and girls.

Title IX is a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education and in activities that receive federal funding — like school athletic programs. But in recent years there have been various policies and rules that drastically redefined “sex” under state and federal law to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

As a result, many policymakers and educators — including officials in Minnesota — have adopted policies that let male athletes compete in women’s sports and use girls’ locker rooms, showers, restrooms, and changing areas at school.

Female Athletes United is an organization that advocates for women and girls in sports. In May, the organization filed a lawsuit to strike down Minnesota’s policy that lets biological males compete in girls’ sports. The organization is represented by attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom. Wednesday’s arguments in court are part of the lawsuit to strike down Minnesota’s policy.

In a statement, Alliance Defending Freedom wrote,

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent Female Athletes United in a lawsuit challenging a discriminatory Minnesota athletics policy that violates the equal treatment and athletic opportunities for girls guaranteed by Title IX.

“Minnesota is failing its female athletes,” said ADF Senior Counsel Rory Gray, who will be arguing before the court. “The state is putting males ahead of females, telling girls their hard work may never be enough to win and that they don’t deserve fairness and safety. By sacrificing protection for female athletes, Minnesota fails to offer girls equal treatment and opportunity, violating Title IX’s provisions. We are advocating for true equality in sports and urge the court to enjoin Minnesota’s discriminatory policy.”

It seems likely that our federal courts ultimately will rule against Minnesota’s policy and uphold fairness in women’s sports.

Earlier this year, President Trump signed executive orders protecting fairness in women’s sports.

Since then the U.S. Department of Education has worked hard to ensure public schools, colleges, and universities treat women and girls fairly.

Letting men compete in women’s sports is unfair, and it effectively erases women’s athletics.

Female swimmerspowerlifterscyclistssprintersvolleyball players, and others have seen their sports radically changed by men who claim to be women. That hampers their ability to compete for athletic scholarships, and it hurts their professional opportunities as adults.

In some sports, letting men compete against women can even be dangerous.

In 2021 Arkansas passed Act 461 by Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) and Rep. Sonia Barker (R — Smackover) preventing male student athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school. This good law protects fairness in women’s sports — and it has spared Arkansas from some of the legal battles that other states have faced over athletic programs.

Arkansas also has adopted good laws protecting physical privacy in school locker rooms, showers, restrooms, changing areas, and sleeping accommodations.

Most Americans agree that athletes should compete according to their biological sex — not their gender identity.

We deeply appreciate organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom and Female Athletes United who stand up for fairness in women’s sports. We also appreciate Arkansas’ lawmakers who have enacted good measures protecting fairness in women’s sports in our state.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

U.S. Department of Education Investigating Four Kansas School Districts for Secret “Gender Transitions”

The U.S. Department of Education says it is investigating four school districts in Kansas for alleged secret gender transitions after a complaint by the organization Defense of Freedom Institute.

The complaint alleges that school officials in Topeka, Shawnee Mission, Olathe, and Kansas City let male students into females’ private spaces and sports at school and hid students’ sexual identity confusion from their parents.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time schools in America have been accused of secretly encouraging students to “socially transition” at school. Our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom have spoken repeatedly about this very issue.

Fortunately, Arkansas has enacted good laws to help prevent schools from socially transitioning children or promoting radical pro-LGBT ideology in the classroom. Arkansas has successfully passed legislation protecting children from gender transition statewide. And the U.S. Department of Education has also rolled back pro-LGBT federal policies enacted under the Biden Administration. All of that is good news.

We deeply appreciate our elected leaders and policymakers who work hard to stand up for students both in Arkansas and across the country.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansas Can Enforce SAFE Act Protecting Children from Sex-Change Procedures

From left: Rep. Robin Lundstrum, Attorney General Tim Griffin, and Sen. Alan Clark discuss the SAFE Act during a press conference on Tuesday, August 12. Rep. Lundstrum and Sen. Clark were the lead sponsors of the measure in 2021.

On Tuesday, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision letting the State of Arkansas enforce a law protecting children from sex-change procedures.

This decision is a victory for children and for common sense.

In 2021, Arkansas became the first state in the nation to pass a law protecting children from sex-change procedures. The Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act prohibits doctors from performing sex-change surgeries or giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors. Unfortunately, the law has been tied up in federal court since 2021 — but Tuesday’s court decision lets the State of Arkansas enforce this good law.

Over the past five years, it has become clear that the medical “consensus” regarding transgender procedures on children has been largely manufactured by pro-LGBT activists.

Men and women have come forward with chilling testimony about how they were rushed through gender transitions as children without knowing the procedures’ risks, consequences, and alternatives.

Sex-change procedures, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones can leave children permanently scarred, sterilized, and at risk of serious health conditions.

Doctors do not know the long-term effects that these procedures might have on people.

Public health experts in the U.S.the U.K.SwedenFinland, and other nations have found that science simply does not support giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to kids.

Last month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a public inquiry into whether U.S. doctors and clinics may have deceived parents and children about the risks of these procedures, and the U.S. Department of Justice announced it had issued subpoenas to doctors and medical facilities involved in performing sex-change procedures on minors.

In its decision to uphold the SAFE Act, the Eighth Circuit made some important points about sex-change procedures performed on kids:

The judges pointed out that children who use puberty blockers are at greater risk of low bone density.

The court noted that “risks for minors using cross-sex hormones include changes in cholesterol and blood thickness, blood clots (increasing stroke risk), and infertility.”

The judges also cited evidence that sex-change surgeries carry risks and can lead to lifelong regret.

All of these findings underscore just how dangerous these procedures are.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin celebrated the decision, calling it “the culmination of many years of tireless and skillful legal work by this office. I am grateful for the excellent work done by my Solicitor General team.”

When U.S. District Judge Moody blocked the SAFE Act in 2021, we said we believed a higher court ultimately would overturn his decision. It took four years, but that is what happened on Tuesday.

The SAFE Act is common-sense legislation that protects children. It received overwhelming support from the Arkansas Legislature, and most voters in Arkansas support the law. It looks like our federal courts do too.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.