Family Council Joins Brief Asking Supreme Court to Protect Prayer Meetings in Homes

Last week, Family Council joined 55 other conservative, pro-family leaders in an amicus brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the right to host prayer meetings at home.
The case is Grand v. City of University Heights, Ohio. Daniel Grand is an Orthodox Jew challenging an Ohio city’s attempt to use zoning laws to stop him from hosting a prayer group in his home.
Our friends at Advancing American Freedom write, “After a neighbor complained to the city’s mayor, the city sent a cease-and-desist letter that said the prayer group was tantamount to operating a house of worship, which would violate the city’s zoning regulations.”
The amicus brief points out that Americans have met for prayer and worship in homes throughout our nation’s history, and that the Constitution protects people’s freedom to exercise their faith.
We have written before about how zoning ordinances are often used to squelch religious freedom.
For example, in 2022, public officials in the Philadelphia suburb of Pottstown, Pennsylvania, issued a citation against two churches operating ministries in their community. NPR affiliate WHYY reported that the churches were cited for violating the city’s zoning code by offering free meals and providing mental health services. Officials later withdrew the citations following public backlash.
If city officials can use zoning laws to stop a Jewish group from gathering for prayer, they could use zoning laws to stop a Christian group from gathering for prayer.
Elected officials have plenty of resources they can use to maintain law and order in communities without restricting religious liberty.
The free exercise of religion is a fundamental right — and it deserves to be treated that way at every level of government.
Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.




