Study Shows Mental Health Problems Surge Among Adolescents Subjected to Sex-Reassignment
A recent medical study out of Finland shows adolescents subjected to sex-reassignment face much higher risk of mental illness.
Over the past 20 years, the number of children who identify as transgender has skyrocketed — especially among biological girls.
A set of studies released some years ago — sometimes called “the Dutch studies” — claimed children with gender dysphoria responded well to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, and that sex-reassignment helped improve their mental health.
Because of the Dutch studies, doctors and clinics in Europe and the U.S. started giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children who disagreed with their biological sex.
But since then, public health experts and policymakers in the U.S., the U.K., Sweden, Finland, and other nations have found that science simply does not support these “gender transitions” for kids.
A new study published in Acta Paediatrica shows the kind of sex-reassignment that pro-LGBT activists have promoted for years actually makes adolescents’ mental health problems much worse.
The study examined nearly 2,100 individuals from 1996 to 2019. Researchers found:
- Adolescents who underwent sex-reassignment were more likely to need psychiatric treatment in the years afterward.
- Adolescents referred for sex-reassignment faced higher risks of mental illness.
- Mental illness appeared to be particularly high among adolescents referred for sex-reassignment during the “recent surge in referrals.”
Unfortunately, this study’s findings are not surprising. Sex-reassignment drugs and surgeries carry serious risks — including infertility, sexual dysfunction, worse bone density, and cardiovascular problems.
Whistleblowers have come forward testifying about how they were rushed through gender transitions as children without understanding the procedures’ risks, consequences, or alternatives.
Today we know pro-LGBT activists and medical organizations have been citing each other’s work in a circular pattern, manufacturing a fake consensus about performing sex-change surgeries on kids.
In 2021, Arkansas’ lawmakers passed the Save Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act. This good law generally prohibits doctors from performing sex-change procedures on children or giving them puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.
A federal court upheld the SAFE Act last year — meaning it is protecting children in Arkansas at this very moment.
Arkansas was the first state in America to enact a law like the SAFE Act, but since 2021 lawmakers in more than half the country have passed similar legislation.
Medical research has shown time and again that Arkansas’ lawmakers were right to pass the SAFE Act. Arkansans can be proud that their state has done so much to protect children from these dangerous sex-change procedures.
Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.
These Two U.S. Supreme Court Cases Could Affect Arkansas Law
Between now and the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court will issue decisions in two court cases that could affect whether states like Arkansas are free to preserve fairness in women’s athletic programs.
Over the past ten years, female swimmers, powerlifters, cyclists, sprinters, volleyball players, and many others have seen their sports radically changed by men who claim to be women. In some sports, it can even be dangerous.
That’s why many states have enacted good laws clarifying that biological males who identify as female cannot compete in women’s athletic programs. Unfortunately, some of those laws have been challenged in court.
In 2020, Idaho passed the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act preventing male student-athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school. The following year, West Virginia passed the Save Women’s Sports Act, which is very similar to Idaho’s law. The ACLU challenged both laws, and both lawsuits have been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case concerning Idaho’s law is Little v. Hecox. In West Virginia, the case is West Virginia v. B.P.J.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in both cases on January 13 of this year, and the Court could issue final decisions in the cases sometime between now and June 26.
The Supreme Court’s decision in these cases could affect laws protecting fairness in women’s sports nationwide — including Arkansas.
In 2021, Arkansas passed Act 461 by Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) and Rep. Sonia Barker (R — Smackover) preventing male student-athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school. Family Council was pleased to support Act 461 at the state legislature.
Act 461 has not been challenged in court — meaning the law is in full effect, protecting fairness in women’s sports in Arkansas.
However, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. could affect Act 461 and laws like it across the country. That’s why Family Council joined dozens of state policy organizations and more than 200 state legislators in an amicus brief in the Idaho case last September. The amicus brief highlights the opportunities that women’s athletics offer to students, and it urges the Supreme Court to uphold the law and protect women’s sports.
Most Americans agree that athletes should compete according to their biological sex — not their gender identity. We believe the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately will uphold fairness in women’s sports in Idaho, West Virginia, and the rest of the country.
Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.