Adolescent Mental Health Crisis Underscores Importance of Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act

The number of teens experiencing symptoms of depression has spiked since 2009.

According to research analyzed by psychologist Jean Twenge, 49.5% of teens say they feel they “can’t do anything right.”

Forty-four percent say they feel like their “life is not useful.”

And a staggering 48.9% say they “do not enjoy life.”

As Twenge’s research points out, these numbers have climbed steadily upwards over the past decade.

Experts increasingly believe social media is driving the adolescent mental health crisis.

In May U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy issued a statement, saying,

Much of the evidence we do have indicates that there is enough reason to be deeply concerned about the risk of harm social media poses. For example, adolescents who spend >3 hours per day on social media face double the risk of developing symptoms of depression and anxiety.

This is concerning, especially given that, on average, teenagers spend 3.5 hours/day on social media, with one-in-four spending 5 or more hours per day and one-in-seven spending 7 or more hours per day on social media.

In May the U.S. Surgeon General released a health advisory highlighting the dangers of social media use by children and calling on lawmakers to take action.

The advisory noted that, “Social media may perpetuate body dissatisfaction, disordered eating behaviors, social comparison, and low self-esteem, especially among adolescent girls,” and it encouraged policymakers to take steps to strengthen social media safety standards and limit social media access in ways that make it safer for children and better protect children’s privacy.

All of this underscores that the Arkansas Legislature was right to pass Act 689, the Social Media Safety Act, earlier this year.

The Social Media Safety Act is a good law by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris) requiring major social media companies to ensure minors don’t access social media platforms without parental consent. Just like the Surgeon General’s advisory recommended, Act 689 contains protections for user privacy. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

Governor Sanders signed Act 689 into law last spring. However, in late June a trade association representing tech giants such as Meta (owner of Facebook and Instagram), Twitter, SnapChat, Pinterest, and TikTok filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging Act 689 as unconstitutional. In July the ACLU of Arkansas filed an amicus brief opposing Act 689 as well.

Given how harmful social media content can be for children and teens, tech companies should not be able to let children use their social media platforms without parental consent. Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act is a good law that helps address this serious problem.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

New Mexico Serves as a Warning to Arkansas on Recreational Marijuana

Two years ago New Mexico legalized recreational marijuana. At the time, the law contained a provision requiring federal FBI criminal background checks for high-level marijuana business owners.

However, KRQE News reports a technicality in the law prevented the background checks from occurring — and lawmakers in New Mexico have failed to address the issue.

As a result, virtually none of New Mexico’s marijuana business owners have passed a federal background check as lawmakers intended. That has opened the door for criminal enterprises to infiltrate New Mexico’s marijuana industry.

The story is significant, because last year voters in Arkansas rejected a recreational marijuana measure that would have specifically prohibited the State of Arkansas from requiring criminal background checks for many marijuana business owners. New Mexico’s experience shows just how devastating that could have been for Arkansas.

Watch this news story from KRQE to learn more.

Hemp Companies Sue to Block Arkansas From Banning Delta-8

On Monday a group of cannabis companies filed a federal lawsuit to block the State of Arkansas from banning Delta-8 THC.

Act 629 of 2023 by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jimmy Gazaway (R – Paragould) is a good law that prevents Delta-8 THC from being manufactured via industrial hemp — or cannabis — in Arkansas.

The law places Delta-8, Delta-9, Delta-10 THC, and other psychoactive drugs made from industrial hemp on the list of controlled substances in state law. It also contains language enacting drug restrictions that would take effect if a state or federal court someday blocked Arkansas from prohibiting Delta-8 altogether.

Delta-8 THC is a mind-altering substance made from cannabis, and apart from Act 629, Arkansas law does not adequately prohibit it.

The Arkansas Legislature passed Act 629 earlier this year, and Gov. Sanders signed it into law. Now companies that profit from Delta-8 THC are suing to block the measure.

According to Monday’s lawsuit, the companies working to overturn Act 629 in court are:

  • Smoker Friendly, a Colorado company that operates 58 stores selling Delta-8 in Arkansas.
  • Sky Marketing, a Texas company that sells substances like Delta-8 wholesale in Arkansas.
  • Bio Gen LLC, a Fayetteville company that farms industrial hemp.
  • Drippers LLC, a company that sells Delta-8 THC and other cannabinoids. According to its website, Drippers operates stores in Greenbrier, Cabot, Hot Springs, El Dorado, and Benton.

It should not come as any surprise that companies who profit from Delta-8 THC in Arkansas are suing to keep Delta-8 legal.

Act 629 of 2023 is a good law that protects Arkansans from dangerous drugs. We believe courts will recognize that fact and ultimately let the state enforce it.