You’re in a conversation and someone accuses you of being “on the wrong side of history” because of something you believe.
What would you say?
It’s common in debates over moral issues for one side to accuse the other of being on the “wrong” side of history. Is it true that the future is destined to follow a long arc that bends toward progressive ideas, and that traditional morality is headed for the “dustbin of history?”
The following is from our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom:
Colorado amended its anti-discrimination law in a way that would force XX-XY Athletics to violate its core beliefs.
XX-XY Athletics is an athletic apparel company that exists to protect women’s sports and spaces. Its mission and message are grounded in the fact that men and women are physiologically different: sex is binary, biological, and immutable, and women deserve the chance to be champions in their own sports. But Colorado’s law makes it illegal for businesses like XX-XY Athletics to refer to males who identify as female by their given names or with biologically accurate pronouns. If XX-XY Athletics speaks the truth, it could face cease-and-desist orders, expensive investigations, hearings, and civil and criminal penalties. Unfortunately, Colorado has passed laws censoring its citizens for years, and this is only the latest example. ADF attorneys filed a lawsuit on XX-XY Athletics’ behalf challenging Colorado’s censorship because all Americans should be able to speak their beliefs without facing government punishment.
