Polymarket Used Deceptive Social Media Ads, Fake Wins to Promote Platform: WSJ

A recent investigation by The Wall Street Journal alleges that the prediction market platform Polymarket hired social media influencers to record deceptive videos appealing to young adults.

Prediction markets exploit loopholes in federal law to bring casino-style gambling to anyone with a smartphone. Whereas traditional gambling operates under state oversight and state law, prediction market platforms claim protection under federal commodities laws. The companies running these platforms let people “invest” in the outcome of a ballgame, tomorrow’s weather, foreign policy, and so on.

But calling it an “investment” does not change reality. When prediction market platforms let users trade hundreds of millions of dollars on the Super Bowl game outcomes — plus millions more on trivial bets like which song would play first at halftime — that is not investing. That is gambling. Unlike other forms of gambling, however, prediction markets are not accountable to state gambling laws.

Polymarket is one of the leading prediction market platforms online today, but the company allegedly has relied on deception to attract customers.

The Wall Street Journal writes that Polymarket hired dozens of “mostly college-age” social media creators who filmed themselves “making fake trades and sometimes scoring fake wins.” The journal reportedly analyzed more than 1,100 videos, reviewed instructional materials, and interviewed creators who have worked with Polymarket.

The investigation found that the social media videos promoting Polymarket “appear genuine at first glance.” In reality, creators videoed themselves using copies of Polymarket’s website to make simulated “trades.” The Wall Street Journal says 118 of the videos it analyzed showed fake wins in which the creators reacted to “outdated footage or fake headlines suggesting they’d won.”

Polymarket allegedly recruited a social-media army to copy and re-post the deceptive videos in order to get them to go viral.

All of this is deeply troubling, because social media platforms, viral videos, and online gambling in general appeal to teens and young adults.

recent report from mental health professionals at Baptist Health South Florida noted that gambling has moved from casinos and racetracks to smartphones — and experts say these online platforms are engineered to keep people engaged, using instant rewards and near-misses to trigger the same brain chemistry as other addictions.

And this kind of predatory gambling destroys families. Internet gambling is ruining lives. Prediction markets are no exception.

As powerful corporations try to make gambling part of everyday life, it’s important for Arkansas to protect its citizens and families from predatory gambling. Otherwise gambling addiction will simply continue wrecking lives and hurting families in our state.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Most Americans Want to Keep Kids Off Social Media

A recent survey from the Pew Research Center shows most Americans support banning children under 16 from using social media.

Between Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok, YouTube, and other platforms, most teens and young adults are on some form of social media. The U.S. Surgeon General says 95% of American teenagers use social media, and about one-third say they use it “almost constantly.” But parents, policymakers, and pundits have raised concerns about the harm that social media can cause to kids.

According the survey Pew conducted, 56% of U.S. adults support a ban on social media use for anyone under 16. Only 21% oppose it. Pew found support for the ban is bipartisan and is strong across every major age group. Among parents with children under 18, with 65% support keeping kids off social media.

Besides banning social media for children under 16, adults support other restrictions on social media platforms. Eighty-five percent support requiring parental consent before a child can create a social media account. Seventy-eight percent support age verification requirements for social media platforms. Another 78% support setting time limits on how long minors can use these platforms. All of these figures are up from past surveys — which shows more and more Americans believe social media platforms need guardrails when it comes to children.

A growing body of evidence shows that — by design — social media platforms are not appropriate for children.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin has filed a lawsuit accusing Facebook and Instagram of using algorithms intentionally designed “to exploit human psychology and foster addiction to maximize users’ screen time.” TikTok has been accused of serving kids a steady “diet of darkness” online. Courts in New Mexico and California have already found Meta liable for harming children on its platforms.

Social media is more than just websites or phone apps. These are multibillion dollar businesses with tremendous influence. The adults who own and profit from these businesses have a responsibility to protect children on their platforms.

Arkansas has been ahead of the curve on this issue. The Arkansas Legislature passed laws designed to protect children online, and Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin has sued Meta and TikTok in state court. In fact, Family Council is not aware of any attorney general in America who is doing more to hold social media giants accountable and protect children online than Attorney General Griffin. But more needs to be done.

Pew’s survey confirms that adults understand these platforms are not safe for kids and support stronger protections for children online. Policymakers need to be sure those protections are put in place.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.