American Medical Association Says It Still Supports Sex-Change Procedures for Children

Late last month the American Medical Association (AMA) board clarified that the organization still believes doctors should be able to perform sex-change surgeries on children.

In February, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons announced it now recommends delaying sex-rejecting surgeries for children until at least age 19, and at the time many media outlets reported that the American Medical Association also believed these procedures were inappropriate for kids. But in its March newsletter, the AMA board clarified that those media reports were wrong. Its policy on sex-change surgeries actually has not changed.

The letter said:

“AMA policy on gender-affirming care is unchanged. Our recent response to questions about [the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’] position statement was intended to preserve—not diminish—access to gender-affirming care, and to clarify and reinforce what our policy has long reflected and standards of care. The AMA supports gender-affirming care as medically necessary per our policy.”

To put it plainly, this is not good news.

Public health experts and policymakers in the U.S.the U.K.SwedenFinland, and other nations have found that science simply does not support giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to kids.

These drugs and procedures carry serious risks — including infertility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone density, and cardiovascular problems. Whistleblowers have come forward to testify about how they were rushed through gender transitions as children without understanding the procedures’ risks, consequences, or alternatives.

Today we know pro-LGBT activists and medical organizations have been citing each other’s work in a circular pattern for years, manufacturing a fake consensus about performing sex-change surgeries on kids.

In 2021, lawmakers in Arkansas passed the Save Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act. This good law generally prohibits doctors from performing sex-change procedures on children or giving them puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

A federal court upheld the SAFE Act last year — meaning it is protecting children in Arkansas at this very moment.

Arkansas was the first state in America to enact a law like the SAFE Act, but since 2021 lawmakers in more than half the country have passed similar legislation.

We are deeply grateful that so many public officials are taking steps to protect children from sex-change procedures. Medical groups like the AMA need to step up and protect kids as well. There is simply too much at stake.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Family Council Joins Brief Defending States’ Authority to Protect Life

Last week, Family Council joined 37 other organizations in a federal legal brief against mail-order abortion drugs.

Arkansas law generally prohibits abortion except to save the life of the mother, and it is a crime for an abortionist to mail abortion drugs like RU-486 into the state. But under the Biden Administration, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration began allowing mail-order abortion drugs. Pro-abortion states have also enacted “shield laws” for abortionists who mail abortion drugs into states like Arkansas.

All of that has undermined Arkansas’ good, pro-life laws that protect women and unborn children from abortion.

In response, the State of Missouri has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the FDA’s mail-order abortion drug protocols. Last week, Family Council joined an amicus brief led by Advancing American Freedom in that lawsuit.

The brief urges the Court to defend the states’ ability to enact and enforce their pro-life laws that protect women and unborn children from abortion drugs.

This is the second time in less than two months that Family Council has participated in amicus briefs against abortion drugs. In February, we also joined a legal brief in Louisiana’s lawsuit against the FDA’s abortion-by-mail policy.

A good court ruling in these cases could help stop the flow of abortion drugs across state lines.

New evidence shows that abortion drugs are much more dangerous than the FDA previously thought.

A recent study by the experts at the Ethics and Public Policy Center found abortion drugs are at least 22 times more dangerous than the U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling indicates. Nearly 11% of women experience serious health complications from abortion pills — including sepsis, infection, and life-threatening hemorrhage.

These drugs should not be available at all — much less through the mail.

Family Council is pleased to join with so many other excellent groups who are willing to stand up for innocent human life in court.

You Can Read The Amicus Brief Here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.