Celebrities Push to Let Boys Compete Against Girls in Sports

Hollywood celebrities and retired athletes are pushing to let biological males compete in women’s sports.

The ACLU recently released a 30-second video featuring nine celebrities urging the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down laws protecting girls’ sports. The ad aired as justices heard arguments in two key cases that will determine whether states can keep boys out of girls’ athletics.

The ACLU ad claims politicians are “fixated on keeping transgender student athletes out of sports” and setting unfair “limits” on children. But the real issue isn’t about keeping anyone out of sports—it’s about fairness and safety for female athletes.

Letting men compete in women’s sports reverses 50 years of advancements for women and effectively erases women’s athletics.

It hampers their ability to compete for athletic scholarships and hurts their professional opportunities as adults.

Female swimmerspowerlifterscyclistssprintersvolleyball players, and others have seen their sports radically changed by men who claim to be women. In some sports, it can even be dangerous.

Concerned Women for America estimates that more than 1,900 male athletes who claim to be female have taken first place medals away from women and girls.

Most Americans agree that athletes should compete according to their biological sex — not their gender identity.

In 2021, Arkansas passed Act 461 by Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) and Rep. Sonia Barker (R — Smackover) preventing male student athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school. This good law protects fairness in women’s sports in Arkansas.

Right now the U.S. Supreme Court is considering laws from West Virginia and Idaho that are similar to Act 461. If the Court rules against these protections, it could affect states like Arkansas.

That’s why Family Council joined dozens of state policy organizations and more than 200 state legislators in a legal brief in the case last September.

Our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom are heavily involved in standing up for fairness in women’s sports, and they recently published a video highlighting some of the girls who have been harmed by school policies letting boys compete in girls’ sports. You can watch that video on YouTube.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Watch: Arkansans Rally for Life in Little Rock

Pro-lifers in Arkansas recently gathered to celebrate the sanctity and dignity of human life.

Our friends at Arkansas Right to Life write:

The 48th Annual March for Life was held on Jan. 18, 2026, along Capital Avenue to the steps of the Arkansas State Capitol in Little Rock, Ark. The observance is a peaceful and prayerful event that attracts thousands of Arkansans from across the state including churches and families to remember the estimated 60-plus million unborn children killed by legal abortion. The keynote speaker was Cathrine Pressly Herring who shared her story about unknowingly being given the pill and the consequences that followed.

You can watch video from the 2026 March for Life below.

Federal Courts Weigh Ten Commandments in Schools

A federal appeals court heard arguments last week in cases that could determine how states display the Ten Commandments in public buildings.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reviewing laws from Louisiana and Texas that display copies of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms. Last year, a three-judge panel ruled Louisiana’s law unconstitutional, but the state requested a full court review with all 17 judges.

Opponents of the Ten Commandments argued that displaying them amounts to religious coercion. Lawyers for the ACLU suggested the First Commandment could discriminate against families with different religious beliefs. One attorney even claimed posting the Ten Commandments in school would be “turning that school into a church.”

But Louisiana’s legal team pushed back, point out the Ten Commandments provide a long and rich tradition in America’s culture, law, and founding principles.

While we are watching the court proceedings play out in other states, it’s worth remembering Arkansas has made headlines in recent months for displaying copies of the Ten Commandments in public schools and buildings as well.

Act 573 of 2025 by Sen. Jim Dotson (R — Bentonville) and Rep. Alyssa Brown (R — Heber Springs) requires privately-funded copies of the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public schools and other public buildings in Arkansas. The measure received strong support in the Arkansas Legislature last year.

However, in an effort to block Act 573, lawyers from the ACLU and a group of atheist organizations sued to block the law in Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville, and Siloam Springs. Judge Brooks has issued decisions against Act 573, claiming the Ten Commandments posters would pressure children “to observe, meditate on, venerate, and follow the State’s favored religious text, and to suppress expression of their own religious beliefs and backgrounds at school.”

Nothing in Act 573 would “pressure” students. In 2017 Arkansas passed the National Motto Display Act allowing the national motto — “In God We Trust” — to be displayed in Arkansas’ classrooms along with the U.S. flag and the Arkansas flag. Act 573 amended the National Motto Display Act to add the Ten Commandments to the list of historical items displayed in school.

Over the years, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that states are free to honor and recognize documents or symbols that are important to our nation’s history — like the Ten Commandments or the national motto.

The Ten Commandments are one of the earliest examples of the rule of law, and they have had a profound impact in shaping our society and our government.

In his motion for summary judgment in the case, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin wrote:

The Ten Commandments “have been the most influential law code in history.” … And displays and depictions of the decalogue and of Moses throughout government buildings and property reflect the significance of the Ten Commandments to our Nation’s history and heritage. … Act 573 does not violate the Establishment Clause because it is consistent with historical practices and understandings and does not bear any of the hallmarks of religious establishment.

During her testimony in support of Act 573 last year, Rep. Alyssa Brown noted that the U.S. Supreme Court now uses a “longstanding history and tradition test” to decide if it is constitutional to display something like a copy of the Ten Commandments. Rep. Brown said, “The Ten Commandments without a doubt will pass this longstanding history and tradition test.”

We believe our federal courts ultimately will agree and uphold Act 573 as constitutional.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.