Democratic Congressmen Ask FTC to Investigate “Prediction Markets” Over Deceptive Trade Allegations

Earlier this month a group Democratic congressmen called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate whether “prediction markets” are engaging in deceptive trade practices.

Gambling has exploded across the U.S. in recent years, and studies show more than half of men ages 18 – 49 now have an active sportsbook account online. But experts are sounding the alarm over internet gambling and federally regulated “prediction markets” that many say are just as addictive as other forms of gambling but not accountable to state gambling laws.

Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi exploit loopholes in federal law to bring casino-style gambling to anyone with a smartphone. The companies running these platforms claim it’s not gambling. They just offer “financial products” that let people “invest” in the outcome of a ballgame, tomorrow’s weather, foreign policy, and so on. But calling it an “investment” does not change what it is: Gambling.

On June 3, a group of congressmen led by U.S. Reps. Kevin Mullin (CA-15) and Gabe Vasquez (NM-02) sent a letter urging the FTC to investigate whether online “prediction markets” are misleading consumers by engaging in unfair and deceptive trade practices.

The letter alleges that “prediction markets” like Kalshi and Polymarket have advertised themselves to consumers as gambling platforms, but have claimed in court that they are actually just investment companies. The letter says that is a contradiction that the FTC needs to investigate.

We have written before about how prediction markets are particularly troubling because they operate without state oversight. When prediction market platforms let users trade hundreds of millions of dollars on the Super Bowl game outcomes — plus millions more on trivial bets like which song would play first at halftime — that is not investing. That is gambling.

Several states have tried to enforce their state gambling laws against “prediction markets.” However, the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed lawsuits to stop those states from regulating “prediction markets.” That’s a problem.

As powerful corporations try to make gambling part of everyday life, it’s important for Arkansas to protect its citizens and families from predatory gambling. Otherwise gambling addiction will simply continue wrecking lives and hurting families in our state.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Legislators Ask Arkansas Department of Education About Delays in EFA Reimbursements

On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) accepted a subcommittee’s approval of new Education Freedom Account (EFA) rules from the Department of Education. During discussion of the rules, lawmakers asked staff members from the Department of Education about delays in EFA reimbursements, and the department acknowledged that approval currently takes 30 days.

Arkansas created the EFA program in 2023, making it possible for students to use public funds to pay for an education at a public or private school or at home. Thousands of homeschool students have taken advantage of the program and test scores show they are excelling.

But earlier this spring the Arkansas Department of Education approved new administrative rules restricting how homeschoolers spend EFA funds on extracurricular activities and establishing complicated preapproval and reimbursement requirements for homeschoolers. Homeschoolers submitted comments to the State and testified in committee that approval for EFA expenses already takes weeks or months. The process created under these rules could take even longer.

The Arkansas Legislature’s Administrative Rules Subcommittee approved the rules without objection at its June 15 meeting, following some three hours of testimony from the Department of Education and from homeschoolers who are deeply concerned about changes the rules make to the EFA program.

On June 19, ALC accepted the subcommittee’s approval of the rules, but Sen. Terry Rice (R — Waldron) asked the Department of Education about the lengthy delays in approvals and reimbursements under the EFA program.

During discussion, the Department of Education indicated it has chosen to review EFA expenses and reimbursements in-house using department staff instead of outsourcing that responsibility to its vendor, Class Wallet, who is helping the state administer the EFA program.

The department also acknowledged that it currently takes its staff approximately 30 days to review expenses and approve reimbursements for homeschoolers, but says it is committed to reducing that timeframe.

You can watch the lawmakers’ discussion with the Department of Education here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.