News Reports, Congressional Hearings Highlight Ongoing Concerns About Privacy on TikTok

News reports and congressional testimony continue to raise concerns about privacy on social media giant TikTok.

A column appearing in last week’s Wall Street Journal highlighted TikTok’s ongoing struggle to protect Americans’ user data from China, writing,

TikTok said it has spent $1.5 billion building an operation intended to convince U.S. lawmakers that the popular video-sharing app is safe.

TikTok executives publicly promised to voluntarily wall-off American user data and bring in engineers and third parties to certify the app’s algorithm delivered content without interference from China, where its parent company, ByteDance, is located.

So far, TikTok is struggling to live up to those promises.

The article goes on to note that TikTok employees sometimes share user data with ByteDance colleagues outside of official channels — including users’ email addresses, IP addresses, and birth dates.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports U.S. Senator Tom Cotton questioned TikTok’s CEO over the platform’s ties to China during congressional hearings last week.

Sen. Cotton — as well as many other elected officials — has expressed concerns that TikTok’s connections to China could give members of the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans’ personal data.

According to the article, TikTok’s CEO denied the company is under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party.

However, last year Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin filed two lawsuits alleging TikTok violated Arkansas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

One of the lawsuits alleges that TikTok failed to fully disclose that TikTok is subject to Chinese law — including “laws that mandate secret cooperation with intelligence activities of the People’s Republic of China.”

The lawsuit also alleges that TikTok “routinely exposes Arkansas consumers’ data, without their knowledge, to access and exploitation by the Chinese Government and Communist Party” and that “TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, has admitted to using data gathered through TikTok to surveil Americans.”

A second lawsuit alleges the social media giant violated the Deceptive Trade Practices Act by promoting “intensely sexualized” content — including content that sexualizes children — on its platform.

Last year the Arkansas Legislature passed the Social Media Safety Act — a good law by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris) requiring major social media companies to ensure minors don’t access social media platforms without parental consent. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

In response, tech giants — such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok — sued to strike down the Social Media Safety Act as unconstitutional.

Last summer U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks in Fayetteville issued an ordering blocking the State of Arkansas from enforcing the Social Media Safety Act.

Among other things, Judge Brooks’ ruling claims that Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act is unconstitutionally broad and vague, and that most social media content is not “damaging, harmful, or obscene as to minors.”

The truth is there’s mounting evidence that — by design — social media platforms like TikTok may deliberately push objectionable content to kids and put users’ personal information at risk. With that in mind, it’s good to see policymakers taking action to rein in these tech giants.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

State of Arkansas Awards Nearly Half a Million Dollars for Pro-Life Alternatives to Abortion

The State of Arkansas has awarded nearly half a million dollars to more than two dozen organizations providing pro-life alternatives to abortion.

Last year the Arkansas Legislature overwhelmingly passed Act 622 of 2023 by Sen. Scott Flippo (R – Bull Shoals) and Rep. Lane Jean (R – Magnolia) authorizing $1 million in state-funded grants for crisis pregnancy centers, maternity homes, adoption agencies, and social services agencies that provide material support to women with unplanned pregnancies. The measure also contained language clarifying that grant funding cannot go to abortion providers or their affiliates.

In December lawmakers cast a procedural vote allowing the Department of Finance and Administration to begin disbursing the grants.

In January, the state awarded $486,480.54 to 26 different pregnancy resource centers. The rest of the $1 million in grant funding is expected to be distributed between now and June 30.

This money will have a tremendous, pro-life impact in Arkansas.

Now that abortion is prohibited in Arkansas except to save the life of the mother, we need to support women and families and eliminate the demand for abortion. This grant funding  does that. It provides women in Arkansas with actual pro-life options — meaning they are less likely to travel out of state for abortion.

Family Council was pleased to support passage of Act 622 last year, and we plan to work for passage of another appropriation measure at the Arkansas Legislature this April.

Below is a list of the resource centers and the grant amounts awarded so far.

Resource CenterDoing Business AsGrant Amount
INFORMED CHOICES WOMENS CENTER OF THE OZ$35,583.50
NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY CENTER$23,985.00
PATHWAY RESOURCE CENTER$20,100.00
HOPEPLACE – FORDYCE$20,000.00
COMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD$20,000.00
ST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INCCOMMUNITY CLINIC$20,000.00
CRADLE THE MATERNITY SUPPORT CENTER OF CKATHLEEN BLOSSOM$20,000.00
OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER INC$20,000.00
ST BERNARDS HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT$20,000.00
ABBA CHARITIES INC$20,000.00
ST JOSEPHS HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTYARKANSAS PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000.00
HOPEPLACE NEWPORT$20,000.00
PLUM FOUNDATIONPEACE LOVE UNDERSTANDING MERCY$20,000.00
PREGNANCY HELP CENTERPREGNANCY HELP CLINIC$19,978.00
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST$19,959.50
CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANCARING HEARTS PREGNANCY CENTER$19,731.00
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$19,500.00
SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTERHANNAH PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$18,519.50
HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER$18,497.76
CHANGEPOINT PREGNANCY CARE AND PARENTING$16,837.50
HOPEPLACE MONTICELLO$16,746.50
HOPE OF THE DELTA CENTER$15,932.28
LIFES CHOICE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$12,190.00
ARKANSAS BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES AND FAMLIVING WELL COUNSELING$11,925.75
FORT SMITH CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC1ST CHOICE PREGNANCY MEDICAL CENTER$11,885.25
HOPES FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CE$5,109.00
Total$486,480.54

Atheist Organization Celebrates Amendment That Would Write Abortion Into Arkansas’ Constitution

On Friday the nation’s most prominent atheist organization issued a statement celebrating the proposed Arkansas Abortion Amendment of 2024.

The group Arkansans for Limited Government is backing the amendment. If passed, the measure would write abortion into the Arkansas Constitution and legalize as many as 3,000 or more elective abortions every year in the state.

Arkansans for Limited Government must collect more than 90,000 petition signatures from registered voters before the amendment can officially appear on the November ballot.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), the Freedom From Religion Foundation — an atheist group headquartered in Wisconsin — celebrated the abortion amendment, writing,

Great news! Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin certified ballot language Tuesday for a proposed constitutional amendment that would overturn the state ban on abortion, joining a growing list of states with pro-abortion referenda in November.

This is not the first time the Freedom From Religion Foundation has weighed in on ballot measures in Arkansas.

In 2022 the group celebrated the defeat of Arkansas’ religious freedom amendment at the ballot box.

More recently, the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a complaint to the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office over inmate baptisms at the county’s correctional facility and provided an atheist display on the Arkansas Capitol Grounds last Christmas.

You can download a copy of the abortion amendment here.