Congressional Committee Alleges Federal Government Urged Banks to Flag Purchases of Religious Books, Sporting Goods

A congressional committee is alleging the federal government pressured banks to flag purchases of religious texts, sporting goods, and political material.

On Wednesday Congressman Jim Jordan (R — Ohio), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, sent a letter to Noah Bishoff, the former director of an office in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

Evidence presented in the letter suggests the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network provided banks and other financial institutions with guiding “typologies” — patterns that could be used to identify suspicious people or activities.

According to the letter, the federal government gave banks search terms that could help flag certain transactions. These search terms and patterns included words like “TRUMP” and “MAGA”, as well as behaviors like booking travel for unclear purposes or buying “books (including religious texts) and subscriptions to other media containing extremist views.”

All of this suggests that the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network encouraged banks to search their customer transactions for these signs as a way of policing political and religious activity.

The letter also expresses concern that banks were encouraged to use Merchant Category Codes (MCCs) to look for terms like, “Bass Pro Shops,” “Cabela’s,” and “Dick’s Sporting Goods” when carrying out “Active Shooter Detection.” Despite these purchases being legal, it seems the federal government treated them as indicators of a potential threat.

Although this congressional committee letter does not get into banking practices, other outlets have reported in the past how government policies allegedly encourage banks to designate conservative organizations as posing a “high risk” or “reputational risk” — giving the banks an excuse to close their accounts.

In 2021 Family Council’s credit card processor terminated its account after designating our organization as “high risk.”

At 10:29 AM on Wednesday, July 7, 2021, our office received a terse email from our credit card processor — a company owned by JPMorgan Chase — saying, “Unfortunately, we can no longer support your business. We wish you all the luck in the future, and hope that you find a processor that better fits your payment processing needs.”

Within sixty seconds, our account was terminated and and Family Council could no longer accept donations online. All we can do is speculate that our conservative principles and our public policy work might have had something to do with the decision to close our account.

Unfortunately, other organizations have had similar experiences as well.

You Can Read Congressman Jim Jordan’s Letter Here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Group Raises $12K for Arkansas Abortion Amendment Campaign

Arkansans for Limited Government raised $12,080 for its abortion amendment effort in December, according to reports filed with the Arkansas Ethics Commission last week.

All told, the group has $14,010 at its disposal.

In November the organization asked Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin’s office to certify the popular name and ballot title of an amendment permanently enshrining abortion in the Arkansas Constitution.

The A.G.’s team has rejected the amendment’s language twice, citing ambiguities in the measure’s wording.

If approved, this amendment would write abortion into the Arkansas Constitution, erase decades of good, pro-life laws, and put women and unborn children at risk.

Family Council has worked for nearly 35 years to promote and protect the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life in Arkansas. We are firmly committed to stopping abortion in our state.

Gen Z, Millennials Say Abortion Ought to Be Prohibited in Some or All Cases: New Poll

Students for Life of America recently polled Gen Z and Millennials on abortion. Here are a few key takeaways:

Nearly one in five (17%) of youth and young adults surveyed said they support a total ban on abortion Only twenty-five percent support unrestricted abortion on demand. Roughly half of respondents want abortion restricted to the first trimester or at 15 weeks.

Over 90% support life-saving measures for babies who survive botched abortions.

After learning of the absence of a National Abortion Reporting Law, 57% voiced support for such a law to track complications from abortions, with 25% strongly supporting.

The research included 1,121 registered voters between the ages of 18-42, with 27% belonging to Gen Z and 73% Millennials. You can read more about the poll results here.

The poll’s findings track with data we have seen elsewhere around the country — including in Arkansas.

On the whole, public opinion polling has found repeatedly that Arkansans believe abortion ought to be either completely prohibited or restricted to certain circumstances.

Since 2011, the Arkansas Legislature has passed more than 40 pro-life measures that protect women and unborn children from abortion — including laws that prohibit doctors from performing an abortion unless the mother’s life is at risk

Today there is no safer place for women and unborn children than Arkansas.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.