Preteen Social Media Use Tied to Lower Scores in Reading, Memory: New Study

A new study shows social media use among children is tied to lower test scores in reading and memory.

Researchers writing in JAMA analyzed data from 6,554 adolescents. While researchers noted the study was limited, they pointed out, “The finding that even low levels of early adolescent social media exposure were linked to poorer cognitive performance may suggest support for stricter age restrictions.”

A growing body of evidence shows that — by design — social media platforms are not appropriate for children.

TikTok has been accused of serving kids a steady “diet of darkness” online and struggling to protect private user data from entities in China, such as the Chinese Communist Party.

Facebook and Instagram have been accused of using algorithms intentionally designed “to exploit human psychology and foster addiction to maximize users’ screen time.”

That’s why Arkansas lawmakers have taken steps to protect kids online. The 2023 Social Media Safety Act by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris) is a good law that requires major social media companies to make sure minors don’t access social media platforms without parental consent. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

The law received strong support at the legislature, but tech giants — such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok — sued to strike down the Social Media Safety Act as unconstitutional. The Arkansas Attorney General is currently defending the law in court.

As we keep saying, social media is more than just websites or phone apps. These are multibillion dollar businesses with tremendous influence.

The adults who run these businesses have a responsibility to protect children on their platforms.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Bringing Back the Bible: Guest Column

The Bible has been the book that has held together the fabric of Western Civilization. … The civilization we possess could not come into existence and could not have been sustained without it. – H.G. Wells 

This quote opens a new documentary, Off School Property, which premieres in theaters on October 23. The film aims to correct the record on one of the most misunderstood aspects of America’s storied history: the separation of church and state. Specifically, the film attempts to convince Americans that it is not illegal to teach the Bible to public school kids.  

Off School Property was produced by the team at LifeWise Academy and highlights something many Americans do not know. As the film website states:

[W]hile the Bible was being removed, an obscure 1952 Supreme Court ruling paved the way to bring it back. This solution has been sitting right under our noses for 70 years, and it allows students to study the Bible—legally—during the public school day. 

The goal of LifeWise Academy is to expand Bible instruction to as many of America’s 50 million public school kids as possible, using a network of buses, off-site class space, and a growing number of trained teachers. In addition to the logistical challenge, the most difficult task is to correct the false assumption that there is no place for God or the Bible in government-run schools. It is an assumption based on the enduring myth that the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment is really freedom from religion.  

This interpretation relies on a phrase from Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists, the first reference to “a wall of separation between Church & State.” But this interpretation of The First Amendment and Jefferson’s letter is exactly backwards. In the vision of America’s Founders, religious freedom is not about keeping religion out of government but keeping government out of religion.  

By the mid-twentieth century, this interpretation was replaced by hostility for religion. People were expected to leave their faith outside the voting booth, outside the courtroom, and, most notably, outside the schoolhouse door. When Madalyn Murray O’Hair pushed for Bibles to be removed from public schools, she did not appeal to “neutrality.” Rather, she declared, “We are Atheists. As such, we are foes of any and all religions. We want the Bible out of school because we do not accept it as being either holy or an accurate historical document.”

Ideas have consequences, and bad ideas have victims. American students have been told for generations that life has no meaning, that truth is an illusion, that moral claims are impositions of power, that they are animals, and that God is a matter of personal preference. In the Abolition of Man, C.S. Lewis argued against this approach to education, which he called making “men without chests”: 

In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful. 

Off School Property corrects the record about the separation of church and state as applied to America’s government-run schools. In 1952, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that teaching the Bible during the school day was, in fact, legal, if it was privately funded, conducted off school property, and done with parental permission. LifeWise Academy has built a national model of launching and resourcing Bible education to public school students during school hours. The LifeWise model is “plug and play” and has been implemented in over 150 school districts across the country.

Off School Property premiers in theaters October 23. Visit lifewise.org/offschoolproperty for more information and to find a theater near you that will be airing the film.

Copyright 2025 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

High Stakes, Higher Costs: The Toll of Sports Betting

Sports betting is now legal in 39 states — including Arkansas, where people wager more than a million dollars a day, on average.

Sports betting often relies on mobile gambling, which is closely associated with problem gambling. Experts now warn that gambling addiction has surged in the wake of sports betting’s legalization.

Below are a few of the ways sports betting — and the gambling problems tied to it — takes a toll on individuals, families, and communities.

The Financial Toll

Sports betting and internet gambling are connected to serious financial problems — including deep debt, missed bills, and bankruptcy.

Mobile sports betting makes it possible for people to place bets during sporting events from practically anywhere. The average sports betting addict using mobile apps accumulates nearly $28,000 in gambling-related debt before seeking help.

These financial strains affect more than just individuals. They hurt families and communities as a whole.

The Mental and Emotional Toll

Sports betting is linked to anxiety, depression, and other mental health problems — especially among teens and young adults. Twenty-year-old males account for approximately 40% of calls to gambling addiction hotlines.

One in four sports bettors worry that they cannot control their gambling.

Research also shows that individuals with gambling disorders experience impaired decision-making and impulsivity — all of which contribute to poor mental health.

The Toll on Athletic Programs

Sports betting undermines the integrity of sports. The NCAA has wrestled with gambling scandals since sports betting’s legalization. Major League Baseball, the NFL, the NBA, and other sports leagues have as well.

The Toll on Families

All of this takes a toll on families.

Sports betting and problem gambling place serious strains on families and have been linked to increased risk of divorce and domestic violence.

Conclusion

Legalized gambling has become a blight in Arkansas. Tax revenue from casinos and sports betting has not improved Arkansas’ roads or boosted the economy. And unless Arkansas’ lawmakers and its people take a stand, gambling addiction is simply going to continue wrecking lives and hurting families in our state.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.