U.S. Attorney Takes Steps to Address Debanking in Virginia

Late last month, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia announced plans to address debanking in the state.

The Eastern District of Virginia Equal Access to Banking Task Force “will investigate allegations of ‘debanking,’ when banks refuse customers access to credit and other financial services based on impermissible factors under current federal and state law.”

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert said,

“Access to banking services is essential in today’s modern economy, and unlawful debanking practices prevent citizens from achieving financial security. My office, along with our partners in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and the Virginia Office of the Attorney General, is dedicated to eliminating these unlawful actions and ensuring that all Virginians can realize their own personal American dream.”

We have written repeatedly about allegations that major financial institutions deliberately targeted conservative individuals and organizations.

Recently our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom discussed how official documents indicate the federal government colluded with big banks to censor Americans.

Congressional investigations show that after the events of January 6, 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department gave banks and other financial institutions guiding “typologies” — patterns that could be used to identify suspicious people or activities — including search terms and patterns like “TRUMP” and “MAGA.”

The government also encouraged financial institutions to comb through transactions for terms like, “Bass Pro Shops,” “Cabela’s,” and “Dick’s Sporting Goods” when looking for “Homegrown Violent Extremism.”

In the summer of 2021, Family Council’s credit card processor that handled donations made via our website abruptly terminated our account after designating Family Council as “high risk.”

At 10:29 AM on Wednesday, July 7, 2021, our office received a terse email from our credit card processor — a company owned by JPMorgan Chase — saying, “Unfortunately, we can no longer support your business. We wish you all the luck in the future, and hope that you find a processor that better fits your payment processing needs.”

Within sixty seconds, our account was terminated and and Family Council could no longer accept donations online. Despite reaching out to the company for an explanation, nobody could tell us why we were designated as “high risk.” All we can do is speculate that our conservative principles and our public policy work might have had something to do with the decision to close our account.

Unfortunately, other organizations have had similar experiences as well. Corporate shareholdersstate attorneys generalcongressmen, and news outlets all have expressed concerns over conservatives being wrongly labeled as “high risk” or “hate groups” and subsequently debanked.

Since then, JPMorgan Chase has taken steps to prevent religiously-motivated debanking. That’s good, but our state and federal government need to make sure this sort of thing never happens to anyone again.

After all, banks that are too big to fail are too big to discriminate.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Dr. Jennifer Bauwens Unpacks HHS Study Finding No Strong Evidence to Support Transgender Procedures

Earlier this month Dr. Jennifer Bauwens, Director of Family Research Council’s Center for Family Studies, appeared on “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” to highlight a new report from HHS regarding children with gender dysphoria.

The HHS study found no strong evidence supporting transgender procedures on children. Instead, medical experts say these children need mental and emotional support.

Over the past few years, it has become clear that the medical “consensus” regarding transgender procedures on children has been largely manufactured by pro-LGBT organizations.

Recently, the U.K.’s National Health Service announced it will start advising clinics to assess children who identify as transgender for mental health problems and other conditions.

The U.K. opted to shutter its transgender clinic and stop giving puberty blockers to children after whistleblowers revealed families were pressured into subjecting their children to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones without adequate mental health screenings or informed consent.

During her interview on “Washington Watch,” Dr. Bauwens explained how the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ 409-page report further debunks the myth that children who disagree with their biological sex must undergo hormone treatments and sex-change surgeries.

All of this reminds us why Arkansas was right to pass the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act in 2021.

This good law protects children in Arkansas from being subjected to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-change surgeries.

Unfortunately, the SAFE Act is currently tied up in court. However, given how medical evidence continues to show these procedures hurt kids, we believe our courts ultimately will uphold the SAFE Act as constitutional.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Detransitioners Tell Their Stories

A recent video from the Heritage Foundation highlights the regret that people often feel as a result of using puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to transition from one gender to the other.

Some years ago, medical experts at Johns Hopkins stopped performing gender-reassignment procedures after discovering they did not help individuals who identify as transgender. Since 2021, we have seen growing concerns about children and young adults rushed through the transition process without adequate mental health evaluations and without proper informed consent.

The Heritage Foundation recently interviewed three people who used surgery and hormones to try to change genders before ultimately detransitioning and accepting their biological sex.

Stories like these remind us why it is so important to protect people from the harmful lies that transgender ideology promotes.

Public health officials in the U.S. and the U.K. have released stunning rebukes of the so-called “gender affirming care” Planned Parenthood and others offer.

Last year The British Medical Journal wrote that ”the advocacy and clinical practice for medical treatment of gender dysphoria [through puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery] had moved ahead of the evidence—a recipe for harm.”

These procedures can leave children sterilized and scarred for life, and doctors don’t know the long-term consequences they may have for children. That is why to date about half the states in the U.S. have passed laws protecting children from sex-change surgeries.

In 2021, Arkansas lawmakers overwhelmingly passed the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act.

The SAFE Act is a good law that prevents doctors in Arkansas from performing sex-change surgeries on children or giving them puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

Unfortunately, the SAFE Act is tied up in court, and a federal judge in Little Rock has blocked the state from enforcing it for now. However, we believe our courts ultimately will recognize that the SAFE Act is a good law and uphold it as constitutional.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.