Federal Judge Rules Crawford County Library Cannot Separate LGBT Books from Children’s Section

Above: One of the pro-LGBT books at issue in Crawford County. The book is intended for children ages 5-9.

On Monday a federal judge in Fort Smith ruled the Crawford County Library cannot place pro-LGBT books in a “social section” separate from the library’s children’s section. The case underscores the growing division in Arkansas over public libraries being used to promote pro-LGBT material to kids.

In 2022 the Crawford County Library System removed LGBT-themed children’s books from the children’s section of the library at the request of the quorum court and placed the books in a separate area of the library.

To be clear, the library did not remove the LGBT books from circulation. It gave the books their own shelf space away from other children’s books.

However, three individuals sued Crawford County in federal court. On Monday U.S. District Judge P.K. Holmes, III ruled against Crawford County — meaning the books must be put back in the children’s section.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. The Jonesboro public library has been at the center of multiple controversies over its decision to place books with sexually-explicit images in its children’s section and for failing to adopt a policy that separates sexual material from children’s books.

The library in Jonesboro even went so far as to post on Facebook that it isn’t the library’s responsibility to protect kids from obscenity.

Other public libraries in Arkansas have failed to separate pro-LGBT books and sexual material from children’s material as well.

Families should be able to take their children to the library without worrying what their children might see, and taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize pro-LGBT library books or graphic novels that depict explicit images of children.

We trust our federal courts ultimately will agree and let local communities like Crawford County protect children from inappropriate material in public libraries.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansas Farm Bureau Forms Campaign Against Marijuana Issue 3

On Monday Arkansas Farm Bureau for a Safe and Healthy Arkansas filed paperwork with the Arkansas Ethics Commission indicating it would oppose Issue 3, a proposal to drastically expand marijuana in Arkansas.

The Arkansas Secretary of State announced this week that Issue 3’s sponsors failed to meet the legal requirements to place the measure on the ballot, but the Arkansas Supreme Court is expected to have the final say over whether the measure will be voted on.

Issue 3 would make more than 30 changes to Arkansas’ constitution. Among other things, the amendment would give a handful of businesses a monopoly over marijuana in Arkansas, and it would remove restrictions that protect children from marijuana marketing.

Under this measure, marijuana users would no longer need to show they suffer from a specific medical condition listed in state law — making it easier to use marijuana recreationally.

The amendment would give free marijuana cards to immigrants and out-of-state residents who come to Arkansas to use marijuana.

Arkansas Farm Bureau for a Safe and Healthy Arkansas is the latest organization to announce opposition to marijuana amendment Issue 3.

Family Council Action Committee has materials available for volunteers and churches regarding the marijuana amendment:

You can learn more at FamilyCouncilActionCommittee.com.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Pro-Marijuana Group Sues Secretary of State, Asks Supreme Court to Place Amendment on Ballot

On Tuesday, sponsors of marijuana amendment Issue 3 filed a lawsuit asking the Arkansas Supreme Court to place Issue 3 on the November ballot.

Earlier this week the Arkansas Secretary of State announced that Issue 3’s sponsors failed to meet the legal requirements to place the measure on the ballot. This lawsuit means the Arkansas Supreme Court will have the final say over whether the measure will be voted on.

Issue 3 would make more than 30 changes to Arkansas’ constitution. Among other things, the amendment would give a handful of businesses a monopoly over marijuana in Arkansas, and it would remove restrictions that protect children from marijuana marketing.

Under this measure, marijuana users would no longer need to show they suffer from a specific medical condition listed in state law — making it easier to use marijuana recreationally.

The amendment also would give free marijuana cards to immigrants and out-of-state residents who come to Arkansas to use marijuana.

On Tuesday, Issue 3’s sponsors asked the Arkansas Supreme Court to overturn the Secretary of State’s determination that they failed to comply with state law and place Issue 3 on the November ballot.

The legal challenge alleges, “[The] Secretary of State refused to count thousands of signatures of Arkansas voters. Had those signatures been counted, the Amendment would have been certified. The Secretary . . . should be compelled to count and verify the signatures of Arkansas voters that he wrongly disregarded.”

The Secretary of State reportedly did not count the signatures, because the measure’s sponsors failed to comply with state law concerning petition canvassing.

Attorneys for the group Protect Arkansas Kids also filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit on Tuesday.

Protect Arkansas Kids is one of the organizations that opposes Issue 3. Intervening in the lawsuit could give the group an opportunity to work against the marijuana measure in court.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.