JPMorgan Chase Moves to Prevent Political, Religious “Debanking”

Fox News and our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom report that JPMorgan Chase is changing policies to prevent religious and conservative groups from being “debanked” over their views.

Fox News reports,

JPMorgan Chase has agreed to update their code of conduct to protect against religious and political discrimination, in what activists are calling a “major win” in the fight against debanking.

Debanking is the phenomenon in which a bank customer has their accounts canceled, often with no explanation. Conservatives have long alleged that banks were unfairly targeting them in the practice.

As part of the agreement, conservative group Alliance Defending Freedom has withdrawn a shareholder proposal brought by their client, Bowyer Research, calling for JPMorgan to issue a report on the risks associated “related to religious discrimination against employees.” In exchange, the bank has updated their Diversity & Inclusion section of their code of conduct to prohibit discrimination against “religious views,” and included language prohibiting discrimination against customers for their “political opinions.”

In recent years news outlets have reported how government policies encourage banks to designate conservative organizations as posing a “high risk” — giving the banks an excuse to close their accounts.

In 2021 Family Council’s credit card processor terminated our account after designating our organization as “high risk.” 

At 10:29 AM on Wednesday, July 7, 2021, our office received a terse email from our credit card processor — a company owned by JPMorgan Chase — saying, “Unfortunately, we can no longer support your business. We wish you all the luck in the future, and hope that you find a processor that better fits your payment processing needs.”

Within sixty seconds, our account was terminated and and Family Council could no longer accept donations online. All we can do is speculate that our conservative principles and our public policy work might have had something to do with the decision to close our account.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Other organizations have had similar experiences as well. In fact, corporate shareholdersstate attorneys generalcongressmen, and news outlets all have expressed concerns over conservatives being wrongly labeled as “high risk” or “hate groups” and subsequently debanked.

Family Council is grateful to Alliance Defending Freedom and to everyone else who has stood up against debanking, and we appreciate JPMorgan Chase’s willingness to adopt new policies that protect people from debanking.

Banks that are too big to fail should also be too big to discriminate. Nobody should have their bank account closed for what they believe.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Legislation Filed to Protect Religious Liberty in Arkansas

Legislation filed at the capitol on Thursday would help further protect the free exercise of religion in Arkansas.

H.B. 1615 by Rep. Robin Lundstrum (R — Elm Springs) and Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R — Branch) would ensure that faith-based adoption and foster care providers, religious organizations, and religious individuals are not penalized for living out their deeply held religious convictions.

The bill also provides legal protections for professionals, students, and state employees who act according to their religious convictions.

In 2015 Gov. Hutchinson signed Arkansas’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act into law to safeguard the free exercise of religion in Arkansas. In 2023 lawmakers passed additional legislation to further strengthen this good law.

Time and again, wedding venuesbakeriesphotography studios, florist shops, and others have come under fire, because their owners wanted to operate according to their deeply held convictions.

Our laws must protect religious liberty as much as possible. H.B. 1615 improves on good state laws to help prevent the government from burdening the free exercise of religion in Arkansas.

If enacted, H.B. 1615 would provide Arkansans with some of the best religious freedom protections in the nation. That would be something to celebrate.

You can read H.B. 1615 here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansas Senate Backs Good Bill Affirming Religious Liberty at School

On Tuesday the Arkansas Senate passed S.B. 223, the Religious Rights at Public Schools Act of 2025.

This good bill  by Sen. Mark Johnson (R — Little Rock) and Rep. Alyssa Brown (R — Heber Springs) affirms public school students’ and teachers’ religious liberties.

S.B. 223 does not create any new rights or liberties. It simply provides public schools and students with an outline of existing religious freedoms — such as the right to pray or discuss religion during free time at school, and public schools’ ability to offer academic courses on the Bible under state laws passed in 2013 and 2019.

The bill also ensures public schools and public school students are informed about how religious liberty is protected under state and federal law. This will help prevent schools from squelching anyone’s religious liberties.

When it comes to religious liberty, public schools have been a battleground for more than 60 years. It’s important that we stand up for religious freedom at school. S.B. 223 is a good bill that helps do exactly that.

The bill now goes to the Arkansas House of Representatives for consideration. Below is an overview of how each senator voted on S.B. 223.

The Following Senators Voted FOR S.B. 223

  • J. Boyd
  • J. Bryant
  • A. Clark
  • Crowell
  • B. Davis
  • Dees
  • J. Dotson
  • J. English
  • Flippo
  • Gilmore
  • K. Hammer
  • Hester
  • Hill
  • B. Johnson
  • M. Johnson
  • B. King
  • M. McKee
  • J. Payton
  • C. Penzo
  • J. Petty
  • Rice
  • Stone
  • G. Stubblefield
  • D. Sullivan
  • D. Wallace

The Following Senators Voted AGAINST S.B. 223

  • S. Flowers
  • Hickey
  • Irvin
  • G. Leding
  • F. Love
  • R. Murdock
  • J. Scott
  • C. Tucker

The Following Senators Did Not Vote

  • Caldwell
  • J. Dismang