Buying a Baby

Our friends at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview recently released a pointed commentary underscoring the issue of people buying and selling of children through commercial surrogacy.

John Stonestreet writes,

According to a recent ABC headline, “2020 [presidential] hopeful Pete Buttigieg says he and his husband are planning to have a child soon.” But that’s simply a misleading choice of words.

A more accurate way to put it would be how our sharp-tongued BreakPoint writer Shane Morris did on Facebook: “2020 hopeful Pete Buttigieg planning to buy an egg and hire a woman to serve as an incubator so he and partner can go on playing house together and turn another human being into their prop. There,” Shane said, “I fixed your headline.”

I wouldn’t have said it quite that way, but Shane has a point. Same-sex couples don’t have children together. They’ve chosen an intentionally sterile relationship, but then borrow from God’s design to bring children into existence before denying them a mother or a father.

When Stonestreet and Morris refer to people buying human eggs and hiring women to carry children, they’re talking about commercial surrogacy, where companies and wealthy couples pay women thousands of dollars for their eggs or to have children for them.

Family Council opposes commercial surrogacy, in part, because we believe it amounts to buying and selling babies. Commercial surrogacy and egg harvesting also carry a number of health risks for women.

Arkansas law currently lets companies harvest women’s eggs for profit. That’s why we supported H.B. 1761 by Rep. Cindy Crawford (R – Fort Smith) and Sen. Missy Irvin (R – Mountain View) this year. This good bill would have regulated the buying and selling of human eggs. It would have prohibited companies from paying women for their eggs, but it contained exceptions for free egg donations and for fertility treatments.

The bill passed in the Arkansas House, but unfortunately failed to make it through the senate before the session adjourned.

Photo by Filip Mroz on Unsplash

Here’s How Many Lives We Estimate Arkansas’ New Pro-Life Laws Will Save Each Year

The pro-life laws we help pass don’t just stop abortion. They save lives.

Our team has analyzed state reports from the Arkansas Department of Health that show how many abortions are performed in Arkansas each year, what procedures abortionists use, how old the unborn children were when they were aborted, and other important information.

Using that data, along with other publicly available data, we’ve estimated the number of lives some of Arkansas’ newest pro-life laws will save each year, if they are enforced properly. We have tried to keep our estimates conservative.

Act 493 (Banning abortions after 18 weeks) 170
Act 700 (Requiring abortionists to be board certified or board eligible OB/GYNs) 300
Act 801 (Extending the waiting period for abortion to 72 hours) 50
Act 619 (Prohibiting abortion because the baby has Down Syndrome) 100
Total Number of Unborn Children Saved Every Year 620

It’s possible some of these laws will get tied up in court, which means we may not see their fruits for a year or two. It’s also possible our estimates are off a little. And these are not the only laws Arkansas passed this year that will help reduce the demand for abortion (see a longer list here).

However, I believe it’s safe to say the average number of abortions performed in Arkansas each year could drop by hundreds thanks to the good laws the Arkansas Legislature has passed this year.