Adolescent Mental Health Crisis Underscores Importance of Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act

The number of teens experiencing symptoms of depression has spiked since 2009.

According to research analyzed by psychologist Jean Twenge, 49.5% of teens say they feel they “can’t do anything right.”

Forty-four percent say they feel like their “life is not useful.”

And a staggering 48.9% say they “do not enjoy life.”

As Twenge’s research points out, these numbers have climbed steadily upwards over the past decade.

Experts increasingly believe social media is driving the adolescent mental health crisis.

In May U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy issued a statement, saying,

Much of the evidence we do have indicates that there is enough reason to be deeply concerned about the risk of harm social media poses. For example, adolescents who spend >3 hours per day on social media face double the risk of developing symptoms of depression and anxiety.

This is concerning, especially given that, on average, teenagers spend 3.5 hours/day on social media, with one-in-four spending 5 or more hours per day and one-in-seven spending 7 or more hours per day on social media.

In May the U.S. Surgeon General released a health advisory highlighting the dangers of social media use by children and calling on lawmakers to take action.

The advisory noted that, “Social media may perpetuate body dissatisfaction, disordered eating behaviors, social comparison, and low self-esteem, especially among adolescent girls,” and it encouraged policymakers to take steps to strengthen social media safety standards and limit social media access in ways that make it safer for children and better protect children’s privacy.

All of this underscores that the Arkansas Legislature was right to pass Act 689, the Social Media Safety Act, earlier this year.

The Social Media Safety Act is a good law by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris) requiring major social media companies to ensure minors don’t access social media platforms without parental consent. Just like the Surgeon General’s advisory recommended, Act 689 contains protections for user privacy. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

Governor Sanders signed Act 689 into law last spring. However, in late June a trade association representing tech giants such as Meta (owner of Facebook and Instagram), Twitter, SnapChat, Pinterest, and TikTok filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging Act 689 as unconstitutional. In July the ACLU of Arkansas filed an amicus brief opposing Act 689 as well.

Given how harmful social media content can be for children and teens, tech companies should not be able to let children use their social media platforms without parental consent. Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act is a good law that helps address this serious problem.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Tech Giants, ACLU Try to Block Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act in Court

Tech giants and the ACLU are working in court against Arkansas’ Act 689, the Social Media Safety Act of 2023.

The Social Media Safety Act is a good law by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris).

It requires major social media companies to use age verification to ensure minors do not access social media platforms without parental consent.

The law contains protections for user privacy. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

Act 689 narrowly cleared the Arkansas Senate last spring, but received strong support in the Arkansas House of Representatives. Governor Sanders signed it into law following its passage.

On June 29 the trade association NetChoice filed a lawsuit in federal court in Arkansas on behalf of its members — which include tech giants such as Meta (owner of Facebook and Instagram), Twitter, SnapChat, Pinterest, and TikTok.

The lawsuit alleges that Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act is unconstitutional and should be struck down.

On July 14 the ACLU of Arkansas filed a proposed amicus brief supporting NetChoice’s lawsuit and opposing Act 689.

The ACLU’s amicus brief claims,

Requiring individuals to verify their ages before using social media will impose significant burdens on the exercise of First Amendment rights online. [The Social Media Safety Act] will rob people of anonymity, deter privacy- and  security-minded users, and block some individuals from accessing the largest social media platforms at all. Additionally, imposing a parental consent requirement on access for young people will impermissibly burden their rights to access information and express themselves online, stigmatize the use of social media, and run counter to the parental authority of parents who do not object to their kids using social media.

The truth is the Social Media Safety Act respects parental authority by prohibiting social media companies from registering children as users without parental consent. Age verification and parental consent requirements for social media companies simply do not violate the First Amendment.

News reports have highlighted time and again how social media giants serve teens a steady “diet of darkness” online.

Despite employing tens of thousands of content moderators, TikTok’s algorithm repeatedly has been shown to inundate teenagers with videos about eating disorders, body image, self-harm, and suicide.

In February the American Psychological Association’s Chief Science Officer told the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee that social media use heightens the risk of negative influences among adolescents, and that young people are accessing social media sites that promote eating disorders and other harmful behavior.

Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt has published an analysis determining that social media is a major cause of mental illness in girls.

And a recent CDC report found 16% of high school students were electronically bullied in 2021 through texting, Instagram, Facebook, or other social media platforms.

Social media companies are owned and operated by adults. Given how harmful social media content can be, the adults running these tech companies should not be able to let children use their platforms without parental consent. Arkansas’ Social Media Protection Act helps address this serious problem.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.