Marriage – Page 34 – Family Council

U.S. Supreme Court Puts a Stay on Federal Judge’s Ruling

Jan 6, 2014JerryMarriageMarriage, Same-Sex Marriage

Last month a federal District Court judge issued a ruling against Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage, resulting in the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples in that state.

Today, however, the U.S. Supreme Court placed a stay on that ruling, meaning marriage in Utah will remain one man to one woman while the lawsuit over Utah’s marriage amendment progresses.

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins summed up the implications of this decision in a statement today, saying, “The Supreme Court has today signaled that it will not allow state laws defining marriage to be set aside by a lone judge without a careful consideration of the issues involved.”

Polygamists Successfully Using Same-Sex Marriage Arguments in Court

Dec 17, 2013JerryMarriageMarriage, Polygamy, Same-Sex Marriage

You may have seen the news, yesterday, that a federal judge in Utah struck part of the state’s ban on polygamy.

In effect, the judge decriminalized polygamy, although he did not go so far as to say the state must give legal recognition to plural “marriages.”

The judge’s ruling relied in part on court rulings same-sex marriage activists have obtained over the years, specifically citing Lawrence v. Texas, a case that has been central to virtually every lawsuit over same-sex marriage, including the Supreme Court decision last summer to strike part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

We’ve written before about how polygamists hope to benefit from same-sex marriage. Now it’s happening. Polygamist cults in Utah are riding the coattails of same-sex marriage.

Below is a video of Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins discussing the issue on CNN last night.

Click here to read more about the court ruling.

Click here to read the judge’s opinion.

Ark. Supreme Court Ruling Undermines Marriage, Child Welfare

Nov 22, 2013JerryFamily, MarriageFamily, Marriage

The Arkansas Supreme Court issued a ruling yesterday overturning a lower court’s child custody order that prohibited an Arkansas man from having overnight visitation at home with his son while the man’s live-in boyfriend was in the home.

Up until now, child custody rulings have typically favored married couples over cohabiting couples, because transient boarders in a home can pose an unknown risk to child welfare, and because research demonstrates time and time again that the most stable environment for a child is with a married mom and dad. This court ruling undermines what we know to be good policy for the children of Arkansas. In effect, it says whether a parent is married or not is irrelevant to the child. That’s utter nonsense.

Some people say these situations need to be examined on a case-by-case basis. The fact is when it comes to child custody as well as adoption and foster care, the State of Arkansas has a number of ‘blanket rules’ it uses. These rules are based on what the state believes will contribute the most to child welfare. If we know children fair better in one type of home as opposed to another, why would we put them in anything less than the best home possible?

The Arkansas Supreme Court has effectively said that marriage doesn’t matter, and the real victims are the innocent children caught in the middle of custody disputes.