My 1973?

Marriage, ,

The following blog post is by Family Council staff member Sarah Bean.

The time is here. I can’t remember being so worked up about the future and what a little ole’ Supreme Court decision could mean. I wasn’t around in 1973 when the abortion decision was handed down, and I really don’t remember much about 9/11, but with the decision that will be handed down tomorrow I feel a heavy pressure all around me—a nervousness that is unsettling.

Marriage as we know it could be forever changed. That’s scary to think about. I don’t know what upsets me more: That our system of checks and balances could be unbalanced by a Federal mandate that trumps what 41 states have said “No” to, or that an institution designed to glorify a Holy God as man and woman come together to form a union might become dishonorable and tainted. I’m definitely more upset by the prospect of the latter, but the former still gets to me.

It is comforting to know God is still in control and He will be glorified no matter what. Of that I am certain. He is the ultimate judge. Days like tomorrow serve as a reminder that we don’t put our faith in men or governments, but in a Holy God.

READ MORE

Press Release: DOMA Ruling an Example of Judicial Tyranny

Marriage,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, May 31, 2012

Contact: Jerry Cox
Office: 501-375-7000
Cell: 501-912-6600

DOMA Ruling an Example of Judicial Tyranny


On Thursday, a U.S. Appeals Court ruled the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.

“This is very disappointing,” said Family Council President Jerry Cox. “Congress passed DOMA in 1996 for the purpose of helping states protect the traditional definition of marriage. Now that protection is being eroded away.”

Cox said part of the reason for the ruling is the Justice Department’s refusal to defend DOMA. “The Justice Department is tasked with upholding and defending the laws passed by Congress. In Arkansas, if the Attorney General refused to defend a law passed by the legislature—or if the police force refused to enforce a law passed by the legislature, for that matter—there would be outrage. The Justice Department decided last year that it was not interested in doing its job defending this law passed by Congress. That simply is not right.”

Cox said, “While this ruling is unlikely to have any immediate affect on Arkansas’ marriage amendment, it could have an impact later on. If this issue is ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Arkansas Marriage Amendment could find itself in conflict with a federal court ruling that affirms same-sex marriage.”

Cox went on to say that any ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that supports same-sex marriage is likely to reenergize efforts to pass a federal marriage amendment that defines marriage across the nation as a union of one man and one woman.

Cox said, “When it’s all said and done, this is just another example of an unelected judiciary running roughshod over the will of the people. Democratically elected lawmakers passed DOMA. Voters in 38 states have said they support the traditional definition of marriage. Governments serve at the pleasure of the people. For judges to repeatedly issue rulings like these that circumvent the will of the people ultimately amounts to judicial tyranny.”

Family Council is a conservative education and research organization based in Little Rock, Arkansas.

###

READ MORE