Updated: Arkansas Leaders Respond to SCOTUS Decision Upholding Fairness in Women’s Sports

Above: Sen. Irvin announces the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act during a press conference in the Capitol Building on February 25, 2021. The measure passed and became Act 461 of 2021.

On June 30, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a good decision upholding state laws that protect fairness in women’s sports.

Several of Arkansas’ leaders issued statements praising the decision.

U.S. Senator John Boozman (R) wrote:

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling was always common sense. Girls deserve a safe and fair environment to compete in, and the Supreme Court was right to protect the integrity of women’s sports. I’m a proud cosponsor of the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act that would ensure schools don’t allow males to share private spaces with females or compete in women’s sports as a condition of federal funding.”

U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R) wrote:

Arkansas was the first state to protect women’s sports from men pretending to be women. Now, the Supreme Court just UPHELD our right to keep men out of women’s sports. This is a huge win for every Arkansan and for common sense.”

Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) called the decision, “A victory for common sense. A victory for fairness. A victory for every girl in America.”

Lieutenant Governor Leslie Rutledge said:

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is a victory for common sense, fairness, and women and girls across America. As Attorney General, I was proud to lead the fight in 2021 to protect women’s sports. Female athletes deserve a level playing field and the opportunity to compete fairly. Boys do not belong in girls’ sports. Period.”

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said:

“The United States Supreme Court has held that West Virginia’s and Idaho’s laws protecting girls and women in school athletics are lawful. This is a commonsense issue about which the vast majority of Americans agree. The Supreme Court has now affirmed that states are well within their authority to prohibit biological males from competing in girls-only athletic competitions, and laws to that effect do not violate the Constitution or Title IX. I co-led an amicus brief with Attorney General Steve Marshall in support of West Virginia’s law, and I applaud the high court’s ruling today.”

Arkansas Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) wrote:

My Fairness in Women’s Sports Act of 2021 is upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

A great day for girls and for states like Arkansas that passed legislation protecting girl’s sports!

Former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) also issued a statement, saying:

On March 25, 2021, I signed the Fairness in Women’s Sports bill into law which bans biological males from competing in women’s sports. The Supreme Court today held such laws constitutional. Great news and right decision.

Over the past ten years, female swimmerspowerlifterscyclistssprintersvolleyball players, track athletes, and many others have seen their sports radically changed by men who claim to be women.

Concerned Women for America estimates that more than 1,900 male athletes who claim to be female have taken first place medals away from women and girls.

In some sports, letting men compete against women can even be dangerous.

That’s why many states have enacted good laws clarifying that biological males who identify as female cannot compete in women’s athletic programs.

In 2021, Arkansas passed Act 461 by Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) and Rep. Sonia Barker (R — Smackover) preventing male student-athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school.

Family Council was pleased to support Act 461 at the state legislature.

Act 461 was never challenged in court — meaning the law has been in full effect for the past five years, protecting fairness in women’s sports in Arkansas. However, the ACLU challenged similar laws in Idaho and West Virginia. By upholding those good laws, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision makes it clear that Arkansas’ Act 461 of 2021 is constitutional.

Most Americans agree that athletes should compete according to their biological sex — not their gender identity. With that in mind, Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision really is a victory for fairness in women’s sports and a victory for common sense.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

This article has been updated to include statements from Sen. Irvin and former Governor Hutchinson.

Good News: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Fairness in Women’s Sports

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 30, 2026

Little Rock, Ark. – On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws protecting fairness in women’s sports.

Family Council President Jerry Cox released a statement praising the ruling, saying, “This is a good decision that makes sure women and girls are not forced to compete against biological males in school sports. Letting males compete in women’s sports is unfair. It erases 50 years of advancements for women and girls. It hurts their athletic and scholarship opportunities as students, and it hurts their professional opportunities as adults. In some sports, it can even be dangerous. Today’s decision is a victory that preserves fairness in women’s sports.”

Cox pointed out that most Americans do not believe girls should be forced to compete against biological males in school sports. “Public opinion polling from Gallup has shown most Americans agree that athletes should compete according to their biological sex — not their gender identity. Protecting fairness in women’s sports is just common sense. Americans understand that, and our federal courts do too.”

Cox said Arkansans should be proud that their leaders have been at the forefront of the effort to protect fairness in women’s sports. “Arkansas was among the first states in the nation to enact a law clearly protecting women’s sports. Act 461 of 2021 by Sen. Missy Irvin and Rep. Sonia Barker prevents male student athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school. Family Council was pleased to work with the Arkansas Legislature to support passage of this good law. Act 461 was never challenged in court, but similar laws in West Virginia and Idaho were. Last year, Family Council joined dozens of state policy organizations and more than 200 state legislators — including Rep. Mary Bentley and Rep. Robin Lundstrum from Arkansas — in a legal brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold those laws. Today the Court did exactly that. That is something to celebrate.”

###

Tyson Family Foundation Pledges Half-a-Million Dollars to Pro-LGBT Efforts in Northwest Arkansas

The Tyson Family Foundation has pledged to give $500,000 as part of a multi-year commitment to support pro-LGBT efforts in Northwest Arkansas. Talk Business reports that with the pledge, the foundation is set “to be a presenting sponsor of NWA Pride Weekend through 2030.”

The Tyson Family Foundation is located in Fayetteville, and its primary purpose is to promote education, health, arts and culture, and youth programs, as well as scholarship opportunities for Tyson Foods employees and their families.

The foundation’s pro-LGBT support comes as other groups are wisely choosing to pivot away from these sorts of initiatives.

For a long time, major corporations and charitable foundations spent a tremendous amount of time and money pandering to pro-LGBT groups. But in recent years, corporate support for LGBT Pride has fizzled and Fortune 500 companies have abandoned the pro-LGBT Equality Index.

Major companies from Walmart to Target and John Deere to Lowe’s have rolled back pro-LGBT policies due to consumer backlash.

In 2023, Bud Light managed to single-handedly overthrow itself as the number-one beer in America after sending transgender social media influencer Dylan Mulvaney a novelty can of Bud Light with Mulvaney’s picture on it. Mulvaney posted a video showcasing the Bud Light can — which led to backlash and boycotts from Bud Light drinkers nationwide. All told, that novelty can of Bud Light ended up costing the company more than $1 billion in lost sales, and the brand has never fully recovered.

The pushback from Americans has reached all the way to Hollywood as well. In recent years, we’ve seen entertainment giants like Disney and Pixar remove pro-LGBT elements from their storylines in response to moviegoers.

It’s obvious that consumers are tired of pro-LGBT pandering by corporations and other groups. It’s also deeply concerning when organizations use their wealth and influence to support ideologies that lead to troubling consequences. These sorts of efforts are out of step with everyday Americans, plain and simple.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.