Farmers Punished For Holding Biblical View of Marriage

Religious Freedom, , , ,

A family farm in Michigan is being blocked from their community’s city-run farmer’s market, because the Tennes family who owns the farm happens to hold a biblical view of marriage.

Family Research Council writes,

When two women asked to be married on [Country Mill farm] in 2014, the Tennes turned them down, explaining that because of their faith, they referred same-sex couples to neighboring farms. Two years later, the couple decided to launch a social media smear campaign, urging people to stay away from Country Mill. When their post was brought to East Lansing’s attention, local leaders raced to pass an ordinance directly targeting small business owners like the Tenneses.

Country Mill Farms has participated in the city’s farmer’s market without incident for at least six years. As a result of this new ordinance, the farm was blocked from selling produce at the market this year.

It’s worth noting this is not the first time a family farm has been punished for holding a biblical view of marriage. In 2014 a New York farm was fined $13,000 for declining to host a same-sex wedding ceremony on its property.

No one should be targeted by the government for their religious convictions, but that’s what we are seeing here. Country Mill Farms has teamed up with attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom to take East Lansing to court over its new policy. Hopefully, this new policy will be reversed and religious liberty will be respected.

READ MORE

Unpacking President Trump’s Executive Order On Religious Liberty

Religious Freedom, ,

Today President Trump signed an executive order regarding religious liberty in America. The order provides much-needed guidance to the Executive Branch–especially the IRS.

Executive orders usually state policies or guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government. For example, executive orders might outline how the government will enforce certain laws or what the president’s priorities are for his administration.

Executive orders do not carry the same weight as a law passed by Congress or a decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court.

You can read the president’s entire executive order on religious liberty here. Below is an overview of the order and its impact on religious organizations.

What The Executive Order Does

  • States that protections for religious freedom should be “vigorously enforced.”
  • Protects religious groups from being targeted by the IRS.
  • Addresses some concerns about mandates contained in Obamacare.
  • Provides directions to the Attorney General concerning religious liberty.

What The Executive Order Cannot Do

  • Repeal the Johnson Amendment–a federal law that greatly restricts political speech by churches.
  • Repeal mandates contained in Obamacare.

The Trump Administration’s Attitude Toward Religious Liberty Generally

Section 1 of the order says, “It shall be the policy of the executive branch to vigorously enforce Federal law’s robust protections for religious freedom.”

This should send a clear message to federal employees at all levels of government about the importance of maximizing protections for religious liberty.

Protecting Religious Groups from IRS-Targeting

Section 2 of the order goes on to say that, “all executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall, to the greatest extent practicable and to the extent permitted by law, respect and protect the freedom of persons and organizations to engage in religious and political speech.”

Section 2 also gives special instructions to the Department of the Treasury–which includes the IRS–not to take adverse action against a religious person or group speaking out about moral or political issues from a religious perspective.

This should help prevent the IRS from targeting religious organizations that speak out on issues like abortion or who highlight candidates’ positions on social and moral issues.

Addressing Obamacare’s Mandates

Section 3 of the executive order directs federal agencies to consider amending rules and regulations to provide greater protection for religious liberty under Obamacare’s mandates.

Many Americans understandably do not want to be forced to pay for abortions and other procedures or “medical services” that they find objectionable, but that’s exactly what Obamacare did.

Federal courts have addressed some of these concerns through rulings like the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision. However rules and regulations from the Obama Administration continued to undermine religious liberty.

President Trump’s executive order should help ensure federal agencies issue rules and regulations that respect rights of conscience and religious freedom.

Directions for the U.S. Attorney General

The final sections of the executive order direct the U.S. Attorney General to provide guidance concerning religious liberty to other federal agencies and contain technical language about the order’s effects.

Conclusion

This order is a step in the right direction.

The President of the United States cannot write laws from the Oval Office or change laws passed by Congress. That means President Trump cannot unilaterally change Obamacare or other federal laws.

However, he can ensure his administration does not undermine religious liberty. That’s what this executive order effectively does.

READ MORE

School Board Resumes Prayer Before Meetings

Religious Freedom, , ,

In March we wrote about how the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation threatened to sue the Harrison School Board over the board’s practice of opening meetings with prayer.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation wrote that, “It is coercive, embarrassing, and intimidating for non-religious citizens to be required to make a public showing of their nonbelief (by not rising or praying) or else to display deference toward a religious sentiment in which they do not believe, but which their board members clearly do.”

According to the Baxter Bulletin, the Harrison School Board decided unanimously to continue opening meetings with prayer after the board researched the legality of the practice.

As we have said before, the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts have ruled time and time again that it is constitutional for these sorts of meetings to begin with prayer.

READ MORE