LA Governor Signs Measure to Protect Kids Online

Decency, , , ,

News outlets report Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry has signed the App Store Accountability Act into law. The measure requires online app stores to verify users’ ages, and it prevents minors from downloading apps or making in-app purchases without parental consent.

The law is similar to measures Arkansas has enacted over the years to protect children from harmful content online.

There is mounting evidence that — by design — social media platforms are not appropriate for children.

TikTok has long been under fire for serving kids a steady “diet of darkness” online and struggling to protect private user data from entities in China, such as the Chinese Communist Party. Facebook and Instagram have been accused of using algorithms intentionally designed “to exploit human psychology and foster addiction to maximize users’ screen time.”

As we have said before, tech companies and social media platforms are more than just websites or phone apps. These are multimillion-dollar businesses. The people who own and profit from these companies have a responsibility to protect their users — especially children.

We appreciate policymakers who take this issue seriously and work hard to enact legislation protecting children on the internet.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

READ MORE

Federal Judge Blocks Key Parts of Arkansas Law Protecting Children from Harmful Material at Libraries

Decency, ,

On Monday a federal judge blocked key parts of Act 372, an Arkansas law intended to protect children from harmful material in public libraries.

The Arkansas Legislature passed Act 372 last year to protect children from harmful material and to eliminate exemptions for public libraries and schools in the state’s obscenity statute. The law also clarifies how library patrons can work to remove objectionable material from a library’s catalog.

Act 372 was slated to take effect last August, but a coalition of libraries in Arkansas led by the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging portions of Act 372.

Last July U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks blocked two sections of Act 372 — Section 1, which makes it a Class A misdemeanor to give or send a child harmful sexual material that contains nudity or sexual activity, and Section 5, which clarifies how library patrons can work to remove objectionable material from a library’s catalog.

The ruling did not affect Sections 2, 3, 4, and 6 of Act 372, which eliminate exemptions for schools and libraries in the state’s obscenity statute, address inappropriate material in public school libraries, and permit the disclosure of certain library records.

The libraries who filed the lawsuit asked Judge Brooks for a permanent injunction blocking Act 372. On Monday, Judge Brooks issued a final decision declaring Sections 1 and 5 unconstitutional. Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin has been defending Act 372 in court, and his office has told reporters they will appeal the decision.

Act 372 isn’t just about library books—it’s about protecting children.

Family Council has heard repeatedly from people who are deeply troubled by obscene and inappropriate children’s books that some librarians have placed on the shelves of their local libraries.

For example, the Jonesboro public library has been at the center of multiple controversies over its decision to place books with sexually-explicit images in its children’s section and for failing to adopt a policy that separates sexual material from children’s content.

The library in Jonesboro even went so far as to post on Facebook that it isn’t the library’s responsibility to protect kids from obscenity. Following the controversy in Jonesboro, voters opted to cut the library’s millage in half.

Other public libraries in Arkansas have included graphic children’s books in their catalogs and failed to separate sexual material from children’s material as well.

Some of the people who testified publicly against Act 372 last spring signaled that they want to be free to share obscene material with children at a library. That simply isn’t right.

Libraries ought to be held to the same standards as everyone else when it comes to giving harmful or obscene material to children.

Public libraries are supposed to be for everyone.

Families should be able to take their children to the library without worrying what their children might see.

And taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize graphic novels that depict explicit images of minors engaged in sexual acts.

Act 372 is a good law that protects children in Arkansas. We believe higher courts will recognize that fact and ultimately uphold this law as constitutional.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

READ MORE

Bad Bill Would Let Arkansas Libraries Distribute Obscenity, Explicit Sexual Material

Decency, ,

On Wednesday Rep. Andrew Collins (D — Little Rock) filed H.B. 1028. This bad bill would repeal Arkansas’ laws that protect children from harmful sexual material and prohibit public libraries from sharing obscene material.

Last year the Arkansas Legislature passed Act 372 of 2023 — a good law that prohibits giving or sending a child harmful sexual material that contains nudity or sexual activity.

Act 372 eliminated exemptions for libraries and schools in the state’s obscenity statute, and it clarified how library patrons can work to remove objectionable material from a library’s catalog. Unfortunately, some protections in this good law have been blocked in court .

Act 372 of 2023 was prompted by obscene children’s books that some librarians have placed on the shelves of their local libraries.

For example, the Jonesboro public library has been at the center of multiple controversies over its decision to place books with sexually-explicit images in its children’s section and for failing to adopt a policy that separates sexual material from children’s content.

The library in Jonesboro went so far as to post on Facebook that it isn’t the library’s responsibility to protect kids from obscenity.

Following the controversy in Jonesboro, voters opted to cut the library’s millage in half.

Other public libraries in Arkansas have included graphic children’s books in their catalogs and failed to separate sexual material from children’s material as well.

Some of the people who testified publicly against Act 372 last year indicated that they actually want to be free to share obscene material with children at a library. H.B. 1028 would do that.

H.B. 1028 effectively repeals Act 372 and the good protections for children that it contains. It also exempts public libraries from the state’s obscenity statute, and it requires public libraries to have “a written policy prohibiting the practice of banning books or other materials because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval” in order to receive public funding.

Public libraries are supposed to be for everyone. Families should be able to take their children to the library without worrying what their children might see, and taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize books that show explicit images of minors engaged in sexual acts.

Unfortunately, H.B. 1028 is a bad bill that would repeal important laws that Arkansas passed to protect children, families, and communities.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

READ MORE