Arkansas A.G. Fighting to Shield Kids Online

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin’s office recently filed documents with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in a case over a state law designed to protect children online.

In 2023 the Arkansas Legislature passed the Social Media Safety Act. This good law by Sen. Tyler Dees (R – Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R – Paris) requires major social media companies to ensure minors don’t access social media platforms without parental consent. A social media company that violated the law could be held liable.

In response, tech giants — such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok — asked a federal court to strike down the Social Media Safety Act as unconstitutional.

In March U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks in Fayetteville issued a final order blocking the State of Arkansas from enforcing the Social Media Safety Act. Among other things, Judge Brooks’ ruling claims that Arkansas’ Social Media Safety Act is unconstitutionally broad and vague.

However, the A.G.’s team indicated it would appeal Judge Brooks’ decision. On September 3, the attorney general’s office filed paperwork with the higher court at the Eighth Circuit regarding that appeal.

A growing body of evidence shows that — by design — social media platforms are not appropriate for children.

TikTok has been accused of serving kids a steady “diet of darkness” online and struggling to protect private user data from entities in China, such as the Chinese Communist Party.

The Arkansas Attorney General’s Office has filed documents in other court cases alleging that platforms like Facebook and Instagram are built around algorithms intentionally designed “to exploit human psychology and foster addiction to maximize users’ screen time,” and that this exploitation is especially true of young users with developing brains.

Social media platforms are a multibillion dollar industry. The adults who own and profit from these companies have a responsibility to protect children on their platforms — and they should not be able to register children as users and let those children post photos and videos on their platforms without parental consent.

Family Council is not aware of any attorney general in America who is doing more to hold social media giants accountable and protect children online than Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin. We appreciate his willingness to appeal to the Eighth Circuit, and we are confident our federal courts ultimately will let Arkansas protect children on social media.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansas A.G. Asks Court to Set Trial Date in Lawsuit Against Meta

The Arkansas Attorney General’s Office is asking a state court to set a trial date in a lawsuit against social media giant Meta — the company that owns Facebook and Instagram.

In 2023, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin sued Meta in Polk County Circuit Court for allegedly misleading the public about the safety and addictiveness of its social media platforms.

The lawsuit says Meta structured Facebook and Instagram “to exploit multiple neuropsychological traits in youth.”

It notes that Facebook and Instagram are built around algorithms intentionally designed “to exploit human psychology and foster addiction to maximize users’ screen time.”

The A.G.’s legal complaint says this exploitation is especially true of young users with developing brains.

The lawsuit also says that, “youth mental health problems have advanced in lockstep with the growth of social media platforms that have been deliberately designed to attract and addict youth by amplifying harmful material, dosing users with dopamine hits, and thereby driving youth engagement and advertising revenue.”

The A.G. is asking the court to stop Meta’s actions and award the state up to $10,000 per violation under the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

In a request filed August 28, Deputy Attorney General Christine Cryer wrote to the court:

Given the age of the case and the amount of work put into preparing the case for trial, we believe the time is ripe to assign this case a trial date. Obtaining a trial date would allow the parties to develop a scheduling order and establish deadlines to govern the progression of this case through its final phases and on toward resolution. With the amount of remaining work that will be necessary to make this case trial-ready, we believe that a 2026 trial setting is reasonable.

The State anticipates that three weeks of trial days should be sufficient to adequately present the issues. This case presents a uniquely important and incredibly urgent matter of public health and safety concerning the youth of our State. Accordingly, we are making this request early so that the Court has ample opportunity to review its docket and find a trial setting that will enable the Court to get this case in front of a jury in 2026.

Social media platforms aren’t just websites. These are multibillion dollar businesses. These companies have an obligation to protect their users. We appreciate the Arkansas Attorney General’s office working to do exactly that.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

A.I. Company Releases Sexually-Explicit Chatbot Rated Ages 12+

Photo Credit: The Daily Citizen.

A sexually-explicit virtual “girlfriend” is now accessible on an AI app rated ages 12 and up.

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) reports that last week xAI chatbot Grok unveiled new animated avatars that users can chat with on its app.

Grok is an artificial intelligence chatbot tied to social media platform X (formerly Twitter). Like most AI chatbots, users can chat with Grok and ask it questions. Grok’s AI iPhone app offers avatars that can speak with the user.

NCOSE writes about these new avatars, saying:

One is a 3D red panda that can switch into a “Bad Rudy” mode, where it starts insulting you and joking about committing crimes together. The other is an anime-style goth girl named Ani, dressed in a short black dress and fishnets. The avatars are designed like a game—you unlock new features and interactions the more you chat with them and move up levels.  …

While Ani is immediately sensual, her conversations become progressively more sexually explicit, including disrobing to lingerie. 

The Daily Citizen reports that Grok does not verify users’ ages, and the app is rated appropriate for ages 12 and up — meaning it’s likely children will encounter “Ani.”

Time reports the chatbot is accessible even when the app is in “kids mode.”

Unfortunately, social media platforms do not have a good track record when it comes to protecting children from harmful content.

Two years ago Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin’s office filed lawsuits against social media giant TikTok alleging TikTok’s owners violated Arkansas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act by labeling the app as being appropriate for ages 13 and up when in reality TikTok should be rated 17+.

The A.G.’s legal team has argued TikTok promotes objectionable content to children on its app, including:

  • Intense profanity and obscenity
  • Sexual content, nudity, and suggestive themes
  • Violence
  • Alcohol, tobacco, and drugs

The lawsuit — which is still proceeding in court — alleges much of this harmful content is available even when teens are using TikTok’s content filtering.

At this point, it isn’t clear if a court would rule the Grok app should be rated 17+.

Arkansas has also enacted measures over the years to protect children from harmful content online — including social media content.

Our friends at the Daily Citizen said it very well:

When it comes to keeping children safe online, parents have their work cut out for them. Companies like xAI shouldn’t compound the problem by adding sexualized A.I. features to an app children use. But, unfortunately, there’s nothing stopping them from doing so.

No company is going to work harder than you to protect your kids. The best solution is to play it safe — keep your kids well away from A.I. chatbots and other dangerous internet traps.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.