Here is an Expanded Overviews of Arkansas’ 2024 Ballot Issues

The following has been adapted from Family Council’s 2024 Arkansas Voter’s Guide.

Issue 1: Arkansas Lottery Proceed Funding for Vocational-Technical School Scholarships and Grants Amendment.

Issue 1 is a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that the Arkansas Legislature voted to place on the ballot. Issue 1 would change the Arkansas Constitution to let proceeds from the Arkansas Lottery fund scholarships and grants for vocational-technical schools and technical institutes. As of September 15, no campaigns have formed to support or oppose Issue 1.

Issue 2: An Amendment Requiring Local Voter Approval in a Countywide Special Election for Certain New Casino Licenses and Repealing Authority to Issue a Casino License in Pope County, Arkansas.

Issue 2 is a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that the group Local Voters in Charge placed on the ballot by circulating petitions via Arkansas’ initiative process. The Arkansas Constitution currently authorizes casinos in Garland County, Jefferson County, Crittenden County, and Pope County. This group of local citizens is trying to remove Pope County from the list of locations where casino gaming is allowed. Under Issue 2, the State of Arkansas would be unable to authorize a casino in any community without a new constitutional amendment and without local voter approval at a special election.

As of September 15, state campaign ethics reports show Local Voters in Charge received $5.6 million from the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma in support of Issue 2.

Issue 2 is opposed by the Arkansas Canvassing Compliance Committee and by the group Investing in Arkansas. As of September 15, state campaign ethics reports show the efforts to defeat Issue 2 have received $2.8 million from the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma.

Issue 3: Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2024.

Issue 3 is a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that the group Arkansans for Patient Access placed on the ballot by circulating petitions via Arkansas’ initiative process. Issue 3 would expand access to marijuana by making more than 30 changes to the Arkansas Constitution. 

Currently, the Arkansas Constitution permits medical marijuana use for specific medical conditions listed in state law. Patients can pay $50 to purchase a medical marijuana card if a doctor examines and certifies them to use medical marijuana. Issue 3 would let a doctor, pharmacist, nurse practitioner, or physician’s assistant certify a person to use marijuana for any reason without a medical exam. Issue 3 would eliminate the $50 annual fee for marijuana cards, meaning cards would be provided for free at taxpayer expense. The amendment would give free marijuana cards to out-of-state users and illegal immigrants who come to Arkansas. Issue 3 also would let people grow and process up to fourteen marijuana plants at home. 

Currently, Arkansas law strictly regulates marijuana advertising, and it contains restrictions on marketing and products that may appeal to children. Issue 3 would repeal current laws that prohibit marijuana advertising, and it would repeal childproof packaging and labeling standards for marijuana. The amendment prohibits any additional regulation or taxation of marijuana by the Arkansas Legislature and by city and county governments. Issue 3 also guarantees existing marijuana businesses a monopoly over marijuana in Arkansas by limiting the number of licenses available to grow and sell marijuana.

Besides changing Arkansas’ medical marijuana laws, Issue 3 also changes Article 5, Section 1, of the Arkansas Constitution concerning ballot initiatives, constitutional amendments, and referenda. Currently, the constitution gives the Arkansas Legislature the authority to change Arkansas’ medical marijuana amendment. Issue 3 would take this ability away and prevent the Arkansas Legislature from ever changing any state constitutional amendment. 

As of September 15, state campaign ethics reports show Arkansans for Patient Access has received more than $1.9 million in support of Issue 3. Most of that money came from members of Arkansas’ marijuana industry, and most of it was used to hire canvassers to gather enough petition signatures to place the amendment on the ballot.

Issue 3 is opposed by Stronger Arkansas, Family Council Action Committee, and Protect Arkansas Kids. As of September 15, state campaign ethics reports show these three campaigns collectively have received more than $700,000 total from different individuals and organizations to defeat Issue 3.

Charges Dropped Against Pro-Lifers Who Allegedly Trespassed at Little Rock Surgical Abortion Facility

Above: A Little Rock police officer arrests a pro-lifer for trespassing outside Little Rock Family Planning Services on January 15, 2021.

Last week authorities in Little Rock officially dropped charges against at least four pro-lifers accused of criminal trespassing at a surgical abortion facility in 2021.

On January 15, 2021, Eva Edl of South Carolina; Chet Gallagher of Tennessee; Dennis Green of Virginia; Calvin Zastrow of Michigan; Emily Nurnberg of Kansas; and Heather Iddoni of Michigan were arrested on misdemeanor criminal trespassing for allegedly blocking the entrance to Little Rock Family Planning Services — a now-shuttered surgical abortion facility in Little Rock.

Court records show the pro-lifers were convicted in February of 2022, and each was ordered to pay a $350 fine. However, their attorney appealed the convictions, and the case has languished in court ever since.

Now a September 25 court filing shows authorities have decided not to prosecute the case any further.

Court documents indicate the State has chosen not to continue the case against Edl, Gallagher, Iddoni, and Zastrow, because the Biden Administration has pursued federal charges against them for blocking abortion facility entrances in other states.

On August 20 a federal jury in Michigan found Edl, Gallagher, Iddoni, and Zastrow guilty of Clinic Access Obstruction.

Emily Nurnberg and Dennis Green were not part of that federal case, and court documents in Little Rock show the State of Arkansas may continue prosecuting the two of them for criminal trespassing in Little Rock.

Family Council will continue monitoring and reporting on this case.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansas Lottery Still Relying on Scratch-Off Tickets, Rolling Out New Games

Above: One of the Arkansas Lottery’s latest scratch-off tickets unveiled on October 1.

The Arkansas Lottery still relies heavily on scratch-off tickets, and it is frequently rolling out new lottery games in its ongoing effort to entice people to gamble.

On October 1 the lottery unveiled four new instant tickets — including the “Ultimate Riches” ticket that sells for $10 each. The odds of winning Ultimate Riches’ top prize are approximately one in 400,000.

Statistically, people who buy this $10 lottery ticket will lose their money more than 60% of the time.

Unfortunately the Arkansas Lottery has a long history of relying on expensive scratch-off tickets with long odds and large prizes to encourage people to gamble. To date, the lottery has rolled out 46 new scratch-off tickets this year alone. Five of the lottery’s current ticket lines sell for $20 apiece.

The bulk of the Arkansas Lottery’s ticket sales down through the years have come from scratch-off tickets, which are often associated with problem gambling and gambling addiction.

He have written before about how expensive scratch-off tickets prey on the truly desperate. They entice Arkansans to spend a lot of money on a single lottery ticket in hopes of a big payout, but more often than not people lose.

Family Council has supported legislation in the past that would restructure the Arkansas Lottery’s budget to increase spending on education.

The state-run lottery could provides millions of dollars more in scholarship funding if it simply would reduce its prize budget, increase its scholarship budget to align with other state lotteries, and quit relying so heavily on scratch-off tickets.

Unfortunately, there simply doesn’t seem to be much impetus to do that.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.