Arkansas House Resolution Honors Home Schooling

Above: Rep. Cooper is H.R. 1021’s lead sponsor.

A resolution filed in the Arkansas House of Representatives on Tuesday honors home schooling across the state.

H.R. 1021 by Reps. Cameron Cooper (R – Romance), Delia Haak (R – Siloam Springs), Wayne Long (R – Bradford), and Mindy McAlindon (R – Centerton) recognizes the fact that home schooling provides educational flexibility and benefits to more than 30,000 students in Arkansas.

The resolution also sets aside Tuesday, February 21, 2023, as Home School Day at the Arkansas State Capitol.

Family Council has always believed families deserve options when it comes to education. That’s one reason we support home schooling.

Home schooling is a great example of how giving families options can help their children flourish.

Family Council has supported home schooling for more than 25 years, because it empowers parents to give their son or their daughter the education that’s right for them. Home schooling in Arkansas has been incredibly successful as a result.

You Can Read H.R. 1021 Here.

Three Bills Filed Addressing Income Tax Credits and Unborn Children in Arkansas

Three different bills have been filed addressing income tax credits and unborn children in Arkansas.

H.B. 1398 by Rep. Les Eaves (R – Searcy) raises the state income tax credit for stillborn children.

Current law provides Arkansans with a $500 income tax credit for a stillborn child. H.B. 1398 increases that income tax credit from $500 to $1,500.

S.B. 261 by Sen. John Payton (R – Wilburn) and Rep. Delia Haak (R – Siloam Springs) is a very simple bill that lets a person claim an unborn child as a dependent for income tax credit purposes.

Changing how Arkansas’ tax code treats unborn children may not seem like much, but this type of legislation reinforces the fact that unborn children are living, human individuals under state law.

H.B. 1299 by Rep. Cameron Cooper (R – Romance) and Sen. Jim Dotson (R – Bentonville) creates a non-refundable income tax credit for contributions to pregnancy resource centers.

Pregnancy resource centers are good organizations that give women real options besides abortion.

Family Council strongly supports giving people a tax credit for donations to pregnancy resource centers. However, there are a couple of problems with the way H.B. 1299 is written.

H.B. 1299’s definition of “pregnancy resource center” excludes abortion providers, but the bill does not exclude organizations that affiliate with abortion providers.

That means that an affiliate of an abortion provider could try to qualify as a “pregnancy resource center” under this bill.

The way H.B. 1299 is written, a person could not claim a tax credit for donating to an abortion provider, but a person might be able to claim a tax credit for donating to an affiliate of an abortion provider if the affiliate could somehow prove that it offers pregnancy testing and other support for pregnant women.

A simple clarification in H.B. 1299’s language would make sure that affiliates of abortion providers are not eligible to participate in the measure’s tax credit program.

The bill also relies heavily on the Department of Human Services and the Department of Finance and Administration to facilitate the tax credit program.

H.B. 1299 could be simplified to create less bureaucracy and make sure the tax credit program works effectively.

Family Council has asked H.B. 1299’s sponsor to amend the bill to ensure that abortion affiliates won’t try to take advantage of the tax credit program and to create less government bureaucracy.

If these changes were made, Family Council would support H.B. 1299.

You can read H.B. 1398 raising the income tax credit for a stillborn child here.

You can read S.B. 261 letting a person claim an unborn child as a dependent for tax purposes here.

You can read H.B. 1299 creating a tax credit for contributions to pregnancy resource center here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Committee Passes Bill Protecting Children From Medical Malpractice in Sex-Change Surgeries

On Monday the Senate Judiciary Committee passed a measure to protect children from medical malpractice in sex-change procedures.

S.B. 199 by Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R – Branch) and Rep. Mary Bentley (R – Perryville) lets a child who undergoes a sex-change procedure sue the healthcare provider who performed procedure if the child suffers any injury as a result.

The bill would let a child file a lawsuit if he or she experiences:

  • A physical or physiological injury from the sex-change procedure
  • A psychological or emotional injury from the sex-change procedure
  • An injury from treatments related to the sex-change procedure
  • An injury from the after-effects of the sex-change procedure

Some injuries from sex-change procedures may not become evident until well into adulthood. That is why S.B. 199 effectively gives a child who suffers one of these injuries until the age of 48 to file a lawsuit against the healthcare provider.

S.B. 199 also outlines informed-consent processes for sex-change surgeries, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones, and it contains protections for healthcare providers who decline to perform sex-reassignment procedures.

The bill now goes to the Arkansas Senate for a vote.