Abortion Lawsuit in Ohio Serves as a Warning for Arkansas

The ACLU and abortionists have joined in a lawsuit challenging common-sense abortion restrictions in Ohio.

If successful, the lawsuit would overturn informed-consent laws that require abortionists in Ohio to give women information about abortion and provide them with at least 24 hours to consider their options before proceeding with the abortion.

Since Ohio enshrined abortion in its state constitution last year, the lawsuit claims the informed-consent requirements unconstitutionally “delay” abortions in the state. The case provides a glimpse of what could happen if the Arkansas Abortion Amendment of 2024 passes this year.

The proposed Arkansas abortion measure would write abortion into the state constitution, and it says the state cannot “prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion” during the first five months of pregnancy — allowing thousands of elective abortions every year and paving the way for taxpayer-funded abortions in Arkansas.

The Arkansas Abortion Amendment also contains sweeping health exceptions for abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy, and it nullifies all state abortion laws that conflict with the amendment — jeopardizing informed-consent laws that offer women critical information about the abortion procedure.

In 2015, the Arkansas Legislature passed Act 1086, the Woman’s Right to Know Act, requiring abortionists to explain the abortion procedure — including its risks, its consequences, and its alternatives — before performing an abortion.

The Woman’s Right to Know Act passed with strong, bipartisan support in the Arkansas Legislature.

Data from the Arkansas Department of Health indicates that from August 1, 2015, to June 24, 2022, over 3,500 women chose not to have abortions after receiving the information outlined in this one law.

The lawsuit in Ohio illustrates how informed-consent requirements in Arkansas could be challenged and nullified if voters write unrestricted abortion into the Arkansas Constitution by passing the proposed abortion amendment.

You can download a copy of the amendment here.

U.K. Bars Puberty Blockers for Minors: Guest Column

The NHS announced the decision after a years-long study found no significant change in the mental health of children treated for gender dysphoria. 

Recently, the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS) announced a new clinical policy barring the prescription of puberty-blocking drugs for minors. The decision came after a years-long public debate around transgender “care,” first started by a surge of referrals to the U.K.’s Tavistock gender clinic. After claims of malpractice, the NHS commissioned an independent review of the national clinic. 

The review found “no statistically significant difference in gender dysphoria, mental health, body image and psychosocial functioning in children and adolescents treated with [puberty blockers].” Review of additional data led the NHS to conclude “that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of [puberty blockers] to make the treatment routinely available at this time.” 

In fact, puberty blockers are neither safe nor reversible, something even the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, the leading transgender medical organization, has been caught admitting.  

Thank God that the U.K. government will protect kids. Hopefully, the U.S. will follow suit. 

Copyright 2024 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.