Eighth Circuit Hears Arguments Over Arkansas Law Protecting Children From Sex-Change Surgeries

On Thursday the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis heard oral arguments in a lawsuit over whether or not Arkansas can protect children from sex-change procedures.

In 2021, lawmakers in Arkansas overwhelmingly passed the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act.

The SAFE Act is a good law that prevents doctors in Arkansas from performing sex-change surgeries on children or giving them puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. 

Unfortunately, the SAFE Act has been tied up in court for more than two years, and a federal judge in Little Rock has blocked the state from enforcing the law. However, federal appeals courts have let similar laws go into effect in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Alabama.

During Thursday’s oral arguments, Arkansas Deputy Solicitor General Dylan Jacobs told the court,

This case is about whether the constitution compels states to allow life-altering gender transition procedures to be performed on minors. Two courts of appeals [the Sixth and Eleventh Circuit Courts] analyzing the same claims at issue here have held that it does not. . . . Arkansas’ law does not discriminate based on sex, it does not discriminate based on transgender status, and it does not run afoul of any parental rights.

Sex-change surgeries and procedures can leave children sterilized and scarred for life.

Researchers do not know all the long term effects these procedures can have on children, but a growing body of scientific evidence shows children should not be subjected to sex-change procedures, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones.

Files leaked from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) organization reveal that medical professionals performing gender-transitions on kids have been fully aware that these procedures can lead to lasting regret and painful complications — some of which may even be life-threatening.

For example, the leaked files showed one WPATH doctor encountered a 16-year-old female patient who had “two [cancerous] liver masses [tumors]” and that girl’s oncologist and surgeon both agreed cross-sex hormones were to blame for the cancerous tumors.

Not long after Arkansas passed the SAFE Act, a major hospital in Sweden announced that it would no longer give puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to kids. Since then, the U.K. has joined a growing list of jurisdictions that protect children from puberty blockers, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has added a warning label to puberty blockers after discovering they caused some biological girls to experience swelling in the brain.

Fortunately, public opinion is shifting on this issue, with more Americans saying it’s morally wrong to change genders.

The SAFE Act is good legislation that protects children. We believe our federal courts will recognize that fact and uphold this law as constitutional.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Small Colleges in the U.S. Vote Overwhelmingly to Protect Women’s Sports

On Monday the National Association of of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) announced a policy that should prevent male athletes from competing in women’s collegiate sports.

The NAIA is a governing body primarily for small colleges and universities. According to its website, the NAIA has 241 member schools — including six schools in Arkansas:

  • Central Baptist College in Conway
  • Williams Baptist University in Walnut Ridge
  • John Brown University in Siloam Springs
  • Philander Smith College in Little Rock
  • Arkansas Baptist College in Little Rock
  • Crowley’s Ridge College in Paragould

The Associated Press reports the NAIA’s new participation policy says all athletes may participate in NAIA-sponsored male sports, but only athletes whose biological sex is female and have not begun taking cross-sex hormones will be allowed to participate in women’s sports. The policy is set to go into effect in August.

We have written repeatedly about how women’s athletics is at risk of being erased in America.

In particular, female cyclists, swimmerspowerlifterssprinters, and others have seen their sports radically changed by biological males who identify and compete as women.

Letting men compete in women’s sports reverses 50 years of advancements for women, and it hampers girls’ abilities to compete for athletic scholarships.

It hurts their professional opportunities as adults. In some sports, it can even be dangerous.

That’s part of the reason why the North American Grappling Association clarified its competition policy last fall, saying biological males must compete against other men, regardless of their gender identity.

And earlier this year the professional golf league NXXT Golf announced that only biological females would be eligible to participate in the NXXT Women’s Pro Tour.

Many states — including Arkansas — have enacted laws that preserve fairness in women’s sports.

In 2021 Arkansas passed Act 461 by Sen. Missy Irvin (R — Mountain View) and Rep. Sonia Barker (R — Smackover) preventing male student athletes from competing against girls in women’s athletics at school.

This good law protects fairness in women’s sports in Arkansas.

It’s worth point out that public opinion is shifting on this issue, with more Americans agreeing that athletes ought to compete according to their biological sex rather than their gender identity. Laws and policies preserving fairness in women’s sports reflect public opinion on this issue.

It’s good to see America’s colleges taking a stand to preserve fairness in women’s athletics at school.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

NCAA Faces Class Action Lawsuit for Letting Biological Males Compete in Women’s Athletics

A group of current and former college athletes recently filed a lawsuit against the NCAA arguing that letting swimmer Lia Thomas — a biological male who claims to be female — compete in the national championships in 2022 violated their federal rights under Title IX.

Thomas shattered women’s swimming records after he started competing against female swimmers, and he was even nominated for NCAA Woman of the Year.

Letting men compete in women’s sports reverses 50 years of advancements for women and effectively erases women’s athletics.

It hampers girls’ abilities to compete for athletic scholarships, and it hurts their professional opportunities as adults. In some sports, it can even be dangerous.

Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines is leading the lawsuit along with 15 other collegiate athletes.

Below is a segment from ABC News covering the story.