Pro-life – Page 291 – Family Council

Understanding Planned Parenthood’s Lawsuits Against the State of Arkansas

Dec 31, 2015Jerry CoxAbortionAbortion, Life, Pro-life, Sanctity of Human Life

In recent months Planned Parenthood has been involved in two federal lawsuits against the State of Arkansas. The first was in the summer and fall of 2015 when Planned Parenthood sued the State for ending Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood clinics. The second was filed in December of 2015, regarding a new law that requires abortion clinics to follow FDA protocols when administering abortion-inducing drugs like RU-486. U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker handled both lawsuits. Below is a brief overview of each suit.

The Lawsuit Over Medicaid Funds for Planned Parenthood

Following the release of undercover videos showing Planned Parenthood doctors and officials discussing the harvest and sale of organs from aborted babies, Governor Asa Hutchinson ordered the State of Arkansas to discontinue Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood.

A federal lawsuit was filed against the state as a result. Judge Kristine Baker issued an injunction forcing the State of Arkansas to continue providing Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood has filed to have the lawsuit upgraded to a class action suit.

The Lawsuit Over Requiring Abortion Doctors to Follow FDA Protocols

Drug-induced abortions are not necessarily safer than surgical abortions. According to Planned Parenthood’s own fact sheet from 2014, during the first 63 days of gestation a chemical abortion is 10 times more likely to result in the death of the woman than a surgical abortion. [1]

When the Food and Drug Administration approved abortion-inducing drugs, it also approved instructions for how the drugs ought to be administered and how doctors ought to follow up with women after chemical abortions. However, evidence suggests many doctors choose not to follow the FDA’s protocols when administering abortion-inducing drugs.

Early in 2015 the Arkansas Legislature passed Act 577 requiring doctors to follow FDA protocols when administering abortion-inducing drugs like RU-486. Act 577 also requires abortion clinics to contract with a physician who has admitting privileges at a local hospital to handle emergencies resulting from chemical abortions.

In December 2015 Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, which has two clinics in Arkansas, filed a lawsuit against the State of Arkansas, arguing, among other things, that it is unnecessary to require doctors to follow the FDA’s protocols for abortion-inducing drugs and that Planned Parenthood has been unable to find a doctor with admitting privileges at a local hospital to handle emergencies resulting from these chemical abortions. If Act 577 is enforced, Planned Parenthood says it no longer may be able to perform drug-induced abortions in Arkansas.

A hearing on the suit was held on Wednesday, December 30, 2015. As of December 30, Judge Baker had not issued any ruling regarding the lawsuit. Any decision she issues likely will be appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Depending on how the Eighth Circuit rules, the decision could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

[1] “Abortion After the First Trimester,” Page 3. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. 2014.

Planned Parenthood Sues State, Says It May End Chemical Abortions Under New Law

Dec 29, 2015Jerry CoxAbortionAbortion, Life, Pro-life, Sanctity of Human Life

Yesterday Planned Parenthood of the Heartland filed a federal lawsuit against Arkansas state officials over a law passed last spring requiring doctors to follow FDA protocols when administering abortion drugs like RU-486.

One of the provisions in the law requires the abortion clinic to contract with a physician who has admitting privileges at a local hospital to handle emergency complications resulting from abortion-inducing drugs. According to various news sources, Planned Parenthood is suing the state in part because it says it cannot find a doctor with whom to contract.

Planned Parenthood says if the law is enforced–and if it is unable to find a doctor with whom to contract–then Planned Parenthood no longer will be able to perform drug-induced abortions in Arkansas.

You can read the full text of the law here.

U.S. Supreme Court Seriously Considering AR Pro-Life Law

Nov 23, 2015Jerry CoxAbortionAbortion, Life, Pro-life, Sanctity of Human Life

Last October Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge sent a request to the U.S. Supreme Court asking them to review the Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Law.

Portions of the law were struck by lower federal courts, but A.G. Rutledge is asking the Supreme Court for a hearing to determine the law’s constitutionality. Progress is being made on that hearing; earlier this month the U.S. Supreme Court asked opponents of the law to respond to the A.G.’s request by December 10.

As the A.G.’s office notes, this shows the U.S. Supreme Court is giving the issue “serious consideration.”

The Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act was sponsored by Sen. Jason Rapert in 2013; it originally prevented most abortions after the twelfth week of pregnancy. Portions of the law pertaining to informed-consent prior to an abortion are still in place, but the provisions preventing a doctor from performing an abortion after the twelfth week of pregnancy if a fetal heartbeat is detected were struck down.

The A.G.’s office asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review and uphold the entire law as constitutional last October; a review would set the stage for the court to revise or overturn key elements of past abortion decisions, such as Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.