Ohio Court Blocks Law Ensuring Dignity for the Unborn

Abortion, , ,

Last week, the A.P. reported a judge in Ohio ruled a law requiring aborted babies to be respectfully buried or cremated violates the state constitution.

In 2023, Ohio voters passed an amendment enshrining abortion in the state constitution. Since then, the ACLU and other pro-abortion groups have filed lawsuits claiming virtually all of Ohio’s laws related to abortion — including informed-consent requirements and medical licensing laws — are unconstitutional.

Ohio’s legislature passed a law five years ago ensuring aborted babies would be respectfully buried or cremated. Laws like these do not restrict or prohibit abortion. They simply outline how aborted babies are supposed to be treated.

Without laws like these, abortionists may sell an aborted baby’s organs to medical researchers or simply incinerate the baby’s remains as if they were medical waste.

The story is a sobering reminder of what happens when states write abortion into their constitutions. Not only is Ohio’s abortion amendment preventing the state from enacting common-sense abortion regulations, but the state can’t even ensure that the bodies of aborted babies are treated with respect.

All of this should concern Arkansas, where pro-abortion groups worked unsuccessfully to place an abortion amendment on the 2024 ballot.

In 2017, the Arkansas Legislature passed Act 603 by then-Rep. Kim Hammer (R — Benton). This good law ensured aborted babies in Arkansas would be respectfully buried or cremated rather than incinerated or sold to research companies.

In response, the ACLU filed a lawsuit to block Act 603 in Arkansas. That case languished in federal court until the ACLU finally dropped the lawsuit following the reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022.

Today, abortion in Arkansas is prohibited except to save the life of the mother. And thanks to Act 603 by Rep. Hammer, if an abortion is necessary to save the mother’s life, Arkansas’ law ensures the aborted baby’s body is treated with the same level of respect we show to other human bodies.

If abortion were written into the state constitution, it could jeopardize even very basic requirements for abortionists — including laws like Act 603 that treat aborted babies with dignity.

That’s a very troubling thought.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

READ MORE

Bill Filed to Protect Women and Children from Abortion Drugs

Abortion, , , ,

New legislation proposed in Arkansas would clarify that abortion by fraud is a crime.

H.B. 1551 by Rep. Jimmy Gazaway (R — Paragould) makes it a felony to secretly give a pregnant woman abortion-inducing drugs without her knowledge or consent.

Right now abortion in Arkansas is generally prohibited except to save the life of the mother, and it is illegal to deliver abortion-inducing drugs into the state. Arkansas also has laws prohibiting fetal homicide. However, Arkansas has no specific law addressing situations in which a person secretly gives abortion drugs like RU-486 to a pregnant woman.

In 2022 a Texas man placed abortion drugs in his pregnant wife’s water in order to cause the death of her unborn child, according to the Associated Press. Since then, states have begun proposing laws like H.B. 1551 to prevent this type of crime.

Abortion-inducing drugs take the life of an unborn child. They also carry significant health risks for women — including risks of sepsis and death. In some cases, abortion drugs actually can be more dangerous for women than surgical abortion procedures.

Our laws should do everything possible to protect women and unborn children from these dangerous drugs. H.B. 1551 is a good bill that will help do exactly that. You Can Read H.B. 1551 Here.

READ MORE

Paid to Provoke? Pro-Life Leaders Testify About Shady Abortion Petition Tactics

Abortion, Legislation, , , , , , ,

On Tuesday pro-life leaders appeared before the Arkansas Senate State Agencies Committee in support of several good bills shoring up Arkansas’ ballot initiative process.

During committee testimony, pro-life leaders Vikki Parker and Wendy Curry gave testimony alleging that canvassers for the 2024 Arkansas Abortion Amendment violated state law and were paid $500 bonuses for “altercations” with pro-lifers who opposed the abortion amendment.

During her testimony, Parker indicated that the allegations were reported to the authorities.

Last year, sponsors of the Arkansas Abortion Amendment hired canvassers to circulate petitions for the measure. Under Arkansas law, petition canvassers are not supposed to let people sign a petition more than once, but on Tuesday Vikki Parker testified that canvassers for the abortion amendment actually encouraged people to do exactly that. You can watch part of her testimony below.

Pro-life leader Wendy Curry also testified that she and other pro-life volunteers encountered aggressive petition canvassers who eventually said they were promised $500 each per “altercation” with pro-lifers, in addition to their regular pay as petition canvassers. You can watch part of her testimony below.

Nationwide, pro-lifers have seen pro-abortion groups use aggressive and deceptive tactics to support amendments that write abortion into state constitutions.

The Arkansas Constitution lets canvassers circulate petitions to place measures on a general election ballot. However, in recent years Arkansas’ ballot initiative process has become the opposite of what it was intended to be. Its original intent was to provide citizens a means of functioning as a “legislative body.” Instead, powerful special interests have used our own ballot initiative process against us.

Tuesday’s committee testimony underscores why states like Arkansas need to reexamine all laws concerning the ballot initiative process. It’s simply too easy for powerful special interests to buy their way to the ballot by hiring petition canvassers or spending millions of dollars on deceptive advertising for misleading measures.

Right now, Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) is sponsoring several good bills that shore up Arkansas’ ballot initiative laws:

  • H.B. 1221 making it clear that petition signatures expire at the end of a General Election cycle. This would prevent canvassers from collecting signatures across multiple election cycles and help ensure sponsors don’t submit old signatures that are outdated or more likely to be invalid.
  • H.B. 1222 clarifying that the Arkansas Attorney General cannot approve a measure’s sponsors to begin collecting signatures to place a measure on the ballot if the measure conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or federal law. The bill also prevents sponsors from asking the attorney general to certify conflicting measures.
  • S.B. 207 requiring petition canvassers to inform people that petition fraud is a crime before obtaining their signatures on a petition.
  • S.B. 208 requiring canvassers to verify a person’s identity via photo ID before obtaining the person’s signature on a petition. This helps prevent people from fraudulently signing someone else’s name on a petition.
  • S.B. 209 clarifying that the signatures a canvasser collects will not count if the Secretary of State finds the canvasser has violated Arkansas’ laws concerning canvassing, perjury, forgery, or fraud in the process of gathering signatures.
  • S.B. 210 requiring people to read the ballot title of the measure before signing a petition. The ballot title includes a summary of the ballot measure. Reading the ballot title helps ensure people understand the measure before they sign a petition to place the measure on the ballot.
  • S.B. 211 requiring petition canvassers to file an affidavit with the Secretary of State verifying that the canvasser complied with the Arkansas Constitution and all Arkansas laws concerning canvassing, perjury, forgery, and fraud in the process of gathering signatures.
  • S.B. 212 creates the Document Validity Division within the Arkansas Secretary of State’s office to investigate, subpoena, and nullify fraudulent or false documents related to ballot initiatives.

If the Arkansas Legislature does not enact good laws that bring accountability and transparency to the ballot initiation process, the problems highlighted during Tuesday’s senate committee meeting will simply continue to get worse.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

READ MORE