Why Arkansas Shouldn’t Prosecute Women for Having Abortions

The Arkansas Legislature will convene for its 2025 session on January 13, and lawmakers will be able to begin pre-filing legislation in just a few days.

As states pass pro-life laws and prohibit abortion, lawmakers are facing questions about whether or not to prosecute a woman who breaks the law by having an abortion.

In 2022 National Right to Life and Arkansas Right to Life joined more than 70 state, national, and international pro-life organizations in issuing an open letter to America’s lawmakers urging them not to prosecute women who have illegal abortions.

Current law in Arkansas exempts a woman from being prosecuted or sued for the death of her unborn child — even if the child’s death is caused by an abortion.

In 2023, lawmakers in Arkansas briefly considered legislation that would have allowed prosecution of a woman who had an abortion.

Here are four reasons why Arkansas law should not punish a woman who has an abortion.

Some women are coerced into having an abortion.

Over the decades, we have heard countless women say that they were pressured into having an abortion against their will.

In some cases it was a parent who told them they had to have an abortion. In other cases it was an abusive boyfriend.

Researchers have found that human traffickers may force their victims to have abortions if they become pregnant.

It isn’t right to prosecute a woman who may have been forced to have an abortion against her will.

Women were not prosecuted for having illegal abortions before Roe.

Before 1973, abortion generally was illegal in Arkansas.

The Arkansas Legislature enacted the state’s first laws against abortion around 1875.

As far as our team can tell, from 1875 to 1973 Arkansas never prosecuted women for having illegal abortions.

The abortionist could be prosecuted for breaking the law, but not the woman. The same was true in many other states that prohibited abortion prior to Roe v. Wade.

Even though Arkansans recognized that abortion was wrong, they also recognized that there were serious problems with prosecuting a woman who has an abortion.

How will our state prosecute illegal abortionists if the women face prosecution too?

Now that abortion is prohibited in Arkansas, our authorities need to be able to prosecute abortionists who violate the law.

In order to do that, they may need testimony from women who have gone to those abortionists for illegal abortion procedures.

Will women come forward to testify against abortionists in court if they know that they can be prosecuted too?

Prosecuting women as well as abortionists may make it harder to hold abortionists accountable for breaking the law.

We don’t have to prosecute women to abolish abortion.

We can prohibit abortion, shut down abortion facilities, and prosecute abortionists without putting women in jail, too.

Abortion facilities that violate state laws should be shuttered, and abortionists who break the law should be penalized.

If we do that, we can stop abortion in Arkansas. We don’t have to prosecute women who have had abortions in order to end abortion

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Planned Parenthood Asks Court to Strike Missouri’s Pro-Life Laws Under New Abortion Amendment

On Tuesday, voters in Missouri narrowly passed an amendment writing abortion into the Missouri Constitution. On Wednesday, Planned Parenthood filed a sweeping lawsuit challenging virtually all of Missouri’s good, pro-life laws.

Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider, and the organization consistently opposes policies that protect women and unborn children from abortion.

Wednesday’s lawsuit challenges Missouri’s many pro-life measures, including the state’s good laws that:

  • Prohibit abortion except to save the life of the mother
  • Require abortionists to give women information about abortion’s risks, consequences, and alternatives
  • Require abortionists to give women 72 hours to consider all options before an abortion
  • Protect unborn children from being aborted due to their race or sex or due to being at risk for Down Syndrome
  • Require abortion facilities to be licensed and inspected by the state
  • Require abortionists to have hospital admitting privileges in case the woman experiences complications from abortion
  • Outline how abortion data is recorded and reported to the state for statistical purposes
  • Prohibit telemed abortions in Missouri
  • Prevent healthcare professionals other than doctors from performing abortions
  • Require abortionists to maintain various plans and agreements for handling abortion complications

This is not the first time pro-abortion groups have challenged commonsense abortion regulations in court. Planned Parenthood and the ACLU challenged reasonable pro-life laws in Ohio after an abortion amendment passed in that state last year.

Informed-consent requirements and facility inspection standards protect women from dangerous abortion practices, but those are the kinds of laws pro-abortion groups are challenging in court.

It does not seem likely that Missouri voters want unreported abortions happening in unlicensed facilities, but the state is facing that possibility now that this abortion amendment has passed.

It’s worth pointing out that Arkansas’ pro-life laws are very similar to Missouri’s — meaning that an abortion amendment in Arkansas likely would jeopardize the very same good laws.

All of this serves as a warning about what can happen when states write sweeping, pro-abortion language into their state constitutions.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Pro-Lifers See Three Big Wins, Two Big Losses on Election Night

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Little Rock, Ark. – On Tuesday, pro-lifers around the U.S. saw three major victories and two significant losses regarding abortion measures on state ballots.

Family Council President Jerry Cox released a statement, saying, “Abortion measures were on the ballots in ten states on Tuesday night, and there were three major, pro-life victories and two significant losses. Voters defeated pro-abortion measures in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Florida. Pro-lifers lost in Missouri and Arizona. Abortion measures were on the ballot in other states where it is already legal, but the votes for those measures simply solidified abortion’s legality there.”

Cox said he believes Tuesday night’s votes show there is strong opposition to abortion in America. “Pro-abortion groups have claimed there is strong support for these measures at the ballot box, but these elections show that isn’t the case. Three states rejected abortion, and the Missouri abortion amendment failed in all but ten of Missouri’s counties. Pro-abortion groups in Missouri spent several million dollars on their campaign, and they still barely passed their abortion amendment. That speaks volumes.”

Cox said pro-lifers are prepared to stop efforts to legalize abortion in Arkansas. “Abortion hurts women, and it ends the lives of innocent unborn children. Arkansas is the most pro-life state in America, and our laws protect women and unborn children from abortion except to save the life of the mother. Pro-lifers strongly opposed the Arkansas Abortion Amendment that failed to make the ballot this year, and we are ready to defeat any similar effort to weaken our pro-life laws in the coming year.”

###