Congress Sidestepping Marijuana Debate…For Now

Marijuana

One of the many problems with “medical marijuana”–besides the threat it poses to public health and safety–is the fact that marijuana is still illegal under federal law.

Medical marijuana growers, sellers, and users could be prosecuted. In fact, Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge acknowledged last January that there is a slim possibility state employees facilitating the “medical marijuana” program could be prosecuted for violating federal law.

The Obama Administration chose to look the other way when state’s passed laws legalizing marijuana. However, earlier this year federal Attorney General Jeff Sessions made comments indicating that might change and that marijuana might be something the U.S. Department of Justice would crack down on in the future.

Last week President Trump signed a federal appropriation bill keeping the government in operation until September. Buried in it is a section reading,

None of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be used, with respect to any of the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, or with respect to the District of Columbia, Guam, or Puerto Rico, to prevent any of them from implementing their own laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.

In other words, Congress is appropriating money for the Department of Justice on a condition: The DOJ cannot use federal money to stop “medical marijuana” in any state that has legalized it.

It’s a cowardly move. Rather than let the Department of Justice do its job–which is to enforce the laws Congress has passed–or have the difficult conversation about whether Congress ought to change its federal marijuana laws, Congress is trying to sidestep the issue altogether by simply preventing the government from enforcing its own laws.

Congress cannot sidestep this issue forever. Eventually, it will have to address the fact that so many states have chosen to ignore federal law by legalizing so-called “medical” and “recreational” marijuana.

READ MORE

Unpacking President Trump’s Executive Order On Religious Liberty

Religious Freedom, ,

Today President Trump signed an executive order regarding religious liberty in America. The order provides much-needed guidance to the Executive Branch–especially the IRS.

Executive orders usually state policies or guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government. For example, executive orders might outline how the government will enforce certain laws or what the president’s priorities are for his administration.

Executive orders do not carry the same weight as a law passed by Congress or a decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court.

You can read the president’s entire executive order on religious liberty here. Below is an overview of the order and its impact on religious organizations.

What The Executive Order Does

  • States that protections for religious freedom should be “vigorously enforced.”
  • Protects religious groups from being targeted by the IRS.
  • Addresses some concerns about mandates contained in Obamacare.
  • Provides directions to the Attorney General concerning religious liberty.

What The Executive Order Cannot Do

  • Repeal the Johnson Amendment–a federal law that greatly restricts political speech by churches.
  • Repeal mandates contained in Obamacare.

The Trump Administration’s Attitude Toward Religious Liberty Generally

Section 1 of the order says, “It shall be the policy of the executive branch to vigorously enforce Federal law’s robust protections for religious freedom.”

This should send a clear message to federal employees at all levels of government about the importance of maximizing protections for religious liberty.

Protecting Religious Groups from IRS-Targeting

Section 2 of the order goes on to say that, “all executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall, to the greatest extent practicable and to the extent permitted by law, respect and protect the freedom of persons and organizations to engage in religious and political speech.”

Section 2 also gives special instructions to the Department of the Treasury–which includes the IRS–not to take adverse action against a religious person or group speaking out about moral or political issues from a religious perspective.

This should help prevent the IRS from targeting religious organizations that speak out on issues like abortion or who highlight candidates’ positions on social and moral issues.

Addressing Obamacare’s Mandates

Section 3 of the executive order directs federal agencies to consider amending rules and regulations to provide greater protection for religious liberty under Obamacare’s mandates.

Many Americans understandably do not want to be forced to pay for abortions and other procedures or “medical services” that they find objectionable, but that’s exactly what Obamacare did.

Federal courts have addressed some of these concerns through rulings like the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision. However rules and regulations from the Obama Administration continued to undermine religious liberty.

President Trump’s executive order should help ensure federal agencies issue rules and regulations that respect rights of conscience and religious freedom.

Directions for the U.S. Attorney General

The final sections of the executive order direct the U.S. Attorney General to provide guidance concerning religious liberty to other federal agencies and contain technical language about the order’s effects.

Conclusion

This order is a step in the right direction.

The President of the United States cannot write laws from the Oval Office or change laws passed by Congress. That means President Trump cannot unilaterally change Obamacare or other federal laws.

However, he can ensure his administration does not undermine religious liberty. That’s what this executive order effectively does.

READ MORE

School Board Resumes Prayer Before Meetings

Religious Freedom, , ,

In March we wrote about how the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation threatened to sue the Harrison School Board over the board’s practice of opening meetings with prayer.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation wrote that, “It is coercive, embarrassing, and intimidating for non-religious citizens to be required to make a public showing of their nonbelief (by not rising or praying) or else to display deference toward a religious sentiment in which they do not believe, but which their board members clearly do.”

According to the Baxter Bulletin, the Harrison School Board decided unanimously to continue opening meetings with prayer after the board researched the legality of the practice.

As we have said before, the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts have ruled time and time again that it is constitutional for these sorts of meetings to begin with prayer.

READ MORE