Little Evidence New EFA Rules Will Save State Money

Family Council has recently spoken to a few policymakers who believe Arkansas’ Educational Freedom Account (EFA) program needs to cut costs. Some hope a new set of rules from the Department of Education will do that. But Family Council has analyzed the rules, and there is very little evidence the new rules will help the State save money.

Arkansas created the EFA program in 2023, making it possible for students to use public funds to pay for an education at a public or private school or at home.

Most students in the EFA program are eligible for up to 90% of the State’s per-student “foundation funding” that it spends on public school students each year. Generally speaking, this means each EFA student gets between $6,000 and $7,000 per school year.

Thousands of homeschool students have taken advantage of this great program and test scores show they are excelling.

But the Arkansas Department of Education has approved new administrative rules restricting how EFA funds can be spent on extracurricular activities, establishing complicated preapproval and reimbursement requirements for EFA funds, and reducing the maximum balance families can carry in their EFA accounts.

Our team has put together a brief overview explaining some of the ways the new rules make the EFA program worse for homeschoolers. You can download it here.

The State’s transparency website reports that since July 1, 2025, Arkansas has spent over $245 million on the EFA program. We believe that money is a good investment in students and families across Arkansas, but some people may feel the State cannot sustain the program every year without cutting costs.

Here is a brief look at some of the reasons why the State of Arkansas won’t save money by restricting homeschoolers in the EFA program.

1. Most EFA money goes to private school students and private school tuition.

Since the program began in 2023, most EFA money has paid for private school tuition.

In fact, state reports show that last year, four out of every five EFA dollars went toward private school tuition and fees.

Homeschoolers spend a fraction of the EFA money that private school students do — which means the State would save very little money by restricting homeschoolers.

2. Of the EFA money that homeschoolers spend, 90% of it is on core educational expenses.

Some people believe the State could save money by preventing homeschoolers from spending EFA money on athletics and extracurricular programs, but state law already caps spending in these areas.

Last year homeschoolers spent only 8% of their EFA money on “enrichment” activities like PE and athletics, music and art, or other extracurricular activities. The rest of the money paid for homeschoolers’ educational supplies, curriculum, class fees, tutoring, and other educational expenses authorized under the LEARNS Act.

Preventing homeschoolers from spending EFA money on certain athletic programs is unfair. It fails to track with state law, and it would save the State very little money.

3. The new preapproval process in the EFA rules adds bureaucratic barriers for families spending Educational Freedom Account money on legitimate expenses, but those barriers won’t help the State save money.

State law and state rules already outline approval and reimbursement processes for EFA spending. The new rules add bureaucracy that will make those processes slower and more frustrating for homeschool families.

Homeschool students often must itemize their EFA transactions for approval, because one family may use multiple curriculum providers, tutors, or suppliers. Each of those transactions may be handled separately.

EFA funds used for private school supplies and equipment do not have to be preapproved by the Department of Education.

Many homeschoolers tell us the current approval process for their EFA spending can take weeks or even months. The new preapproval requirements in the EFA rules would simply slow that process down even more.

There is little reason to believe that making the process slower or more cumbersome would save the State money.

4. Reducing an Educational Freedom Account’s maximum balance won’t change the amount of money that the State awards to EFA students each year.

Under the LEARNS Act, most students in the EFA program are eligible for up to 90% of the State’s per-student “foundation funding” that it spends on public school students.

Practically, this means each EFA student gets between $6,000 and $7,000 per school year.

Currently, if students don’t spend all of their EFA money, the surplus can roll over from year to year. Unspent EFA money can grow to a maximum balance of $20,000. This helps families with young children save EFA money for future educational expenses.

The new rules reduce that maximum balance from $20,000 to $8,500.

Reducing the EFA account balance might sound like it would save the State money, but the rules only apply to surplus EFA funds that families don’t spend by the end of the year.

That means it won’t save the State any money if students spend all of their EFA funds each year, and it won’t reduce the amount of money that the LEARNS Act allocates for each student every year.

If the State of Arkansas is concerned about EFA spending, there may be ways to adjust the EFA program and cut costs. Unfortunately, these new rules fail to do that.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Mail-Order Abortion, Homeschool Rules, and More: New This Week

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is weekly-rewind-banner-corrected-1024x165.png

Here’s a quick recap of the week’s top stories from Family Council and our friends:

From Family Council

⚖️ Family Council Asks U.S. Attorney’s Office to Enforce Federal Law Against Mail-Order Abortion Drugs: Last week, Family Council sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas respectfully asking the office to enforce federal law as it applies to mail-order abortion drugs. Keep Reading.

📅 Lawmakers Could Vote on EFA Homeschool Rules at June 15 Meeting: The Arkansas Legislative Council’s Administrative Rules Subcommittee could vote on a proposed set of Educational Freedom Account (EFA) rules at its June 15 meeting at 1:30 P.M. in Little Rock. Arkansans who want to make their voices heard on these rules should contact their lawmakers as soon as possible. Keep Reading.

🌊 Atheist Group Opposes Inmate Baptisms in Arkansas: Earlier this month, the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to Drew County Sheriff Tim Nichols complaining about inmate baptisms after Sheriff Nichols posted on the Drew County Sheriff’s Office Facebook page about 13 inmates who were baptized at Pauline Baptist Church in March. Keep Reading.

🍼 Investigation Shows Birth Tourism Centers Operating on American Soil: A new investigation shows Chinese birth tourism centers are operating on U.S. soil — and the problem may be bigger than most Americans realize. Keep Reading.

📱 Concerns Over Addiction Grow as Gambling Becomes as Easy as Sending a Text: Concerns are growing nationwide about a new wave of gambling addiction from sports betting and online “prediction markets.” Keep Reading.

💵 U.S. Senators Working to Protect Kids from Gambling Ads: The Wall Street Journal reports two U.S. Senators are working on a bipartisan effort to protect children from gambling ads. Keep Reading.

🏛️ Leaders Call for Congressional Inquiry into SPLC Fraud Allegations: The SPLC has spent decades opposing white supremacy while also branding Christian organizations like Family Research Council and Focus on the Family as “hate groups” on par with Neo-Nazis and the KKK. The organization has also urged financial institutions to de-bank conservatives. But last month an indictment from a federal Grand Jury said the SPLC has secretly funneled more than $3 million to a covert network of informants affiliated with groups like the Ku Klux Klan. Keep Reading.

From Our Friends

Boys Atop Girls’ Podiums: Where Are the Dads? From Daily Citizen.

Woman needed ‘advanced life support’ after abortion at Rhode Island Planned Parenthood. From Live Action.

Human Exceptionalism and Artificial Intelligence. From Breakpoint.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Family Council Asks U.S. Attorney’s Office to Enforce Federal Law Against Mail-Order Abortion Drugs

On Friday, Family Council sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas respectfully asking the office to enforce federal law as it applies to mail-order abortion drugs.

Arkansas law generally prohibits abortion except to save the life of the mother, and it is a crime for an abortionist to mail abortion drugs like RU-486 into the state.

But under President Biden, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration loosened its safety protocols to allow mail-order abortion drugs. Pro-abortion states have also enacted “shield laws” for abortionists who mail abortion drugs into states like Arkansas.

All of that has created a dangerous industry of mail-order abortion in Arkansas and across the nation.

However, the federal Comstock Act of 1873 makes it a crime to mail “every article or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion.” Family Council’s letter to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas argues that the federal Comstock Act should prevent abortionists in other states from mailing abortion drugs into Arkansas in violation of state law.

The letter says:

“Since the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization returned abortion policy to the states, a disturbing workaround has emerged: the mass mailing of mifepristone directly to patients across state lines, including into states where the people’s elected representatives have enacted strong protections for unborn children.

“Arkansas Code Annotated §§ 5-61-304 and 5-61-404 prohibit abortion except to save the life of the pregnant woman in a medical emergency, and Arkansas Code Annotated § 20-16-1504 says it is unlawful for ‘any manufacturer, supplier, physician, or any other person to provide any abortion-inducing drug via courier, delivery, or mail service.’ The Arkansas General Assembly enacted these laws via the legislative process. However, Aid Access, Plan C, and a constellation of other organizations openly advertise the shipment of mifepristone into states where abortion is restricted or prohibited. This is not a secret operation. It is a deliberate, coordinated effort to circumvent the democratic decisions of states like Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and others that have enacted protections for the unborn. These providers are not merely skirting state law; they are willfully violating federal law.”

Family Council has also recently joined amicus briefs in federal court arguing that mail-order abortion drugs violate the Comstock Act.

Abortion drugs should not be available at all — much less through the mail.

We now know drugs like mifepristone and misoprostol are much more dangerous than the FDA originally thought.

A recent study by the experts at the Ethics and Public Policy Center found nearly 11% of women experienced serious health complications from abortion pills — including sepsis, infection, and life-threatening hemorrhage.

These drugs hurt women and end the lives of unborn children. That’s why we hope our federal officials will take the necessary steps to stop the flow of dangerous abortion drugs across state lines.

You can read the entire letter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office here.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.