Guest Column: Is Sports Betting Okay?

Last month, the National Basketball Association was rocked by the arrests of players and coaches resulting from an FBI probe into sports gambling. The charges ranged from mafia-linked poker games to rigging basketball games, and more indictments are expected. This month, two Major League Baseball pitchers were arrested in connection with a pitch rigging scheme, also tied to sports betting.  

ESPN’s Michael Wilbon was dismissive, saying, “I don’t care.” But then, he put his finger on why the problem is so serious: “At the highest levels of the pyramid in this country, of this culture, everybody’s betting now.” Sports has long been plagued by gambling scandals, but today, sports gambling has been normalized and is pervasive in homes, high schools, and locker rooms across America.  

A recent video in the What Would You Say? series discussed sports gambling and why it is such a big deal:

Betting on sports is nothing new, but since a 2018 Supreme Court case struck down a federal ban and paved the way for 38 states along with Washington, D.C., to allow sports gambling, it has exploded in popularity. So far, this national experiment has been a disaster for individuals and families. 

The next time someone says, “Sports gambling is harmless fun. It shouldn’t be regulated,” remember these three things: 

First, sports gambling is addictive and destroys lives. During the 2024 NFL season, $34 billion in bets were placed. That’s a third more than the prior year, and 100% more than six years ago, when sports gambling was re-legalized. During that time frame, sportsbooks have raked in over $300 billion. All that money isn’t coming from winners. 

Most modern sports gambling is done through smartphone-based apps. Studies show that gambling on apps is even harder to stop than casino or other forms of gambling, and it attracts people to gamble who may have never otherwise tried it. Phone-based apps activate the same reward centers in the brain as drugs and alcohol, and are always available in users’ pockets, ready and waiting every time a game is on. Long gone are the days when fans had to visit seedy parts of town to place their bets. Now, eye-catching apps with flashy ads are never more than a tap away. 

This increased access to betting has caused what one writer at The Atlantic described as “a wave of financial and familial misery,” which falls most on households least able to afford it. For every dollar spent on betting, household investing falls by an average of $2. In fact, since sports gambling was re-legalized, there has also been a notable increase in over-drafted bank accounts, maxed out credit cards, and debt delinquency. Sports gambling increases the likelihood that a family will go bankrupt by 25% to 30%. If it’s true that “the house always wins,” more households than ever are losing. 

Second, sports gambling victimizes the innocent. One of the primary arguments for legalizing this kind of gambling is that it doesn’t harm anyone. So, why should the government tell people what they can do with their money? However, money problems and addiction are plagues on households, and sports gambling brings home the worst of both things. In the process, other social pathologies are made worse. 

Research has found that an unexpected loss for an NFL team now correlates with a 10% spike in male domestic abuse. States with legalized sports gambling have seen an estimated 9% increase in violence against intimate partners. In other words, men who gamble on sports don’t just lose money. They lose their self-restraint and hurt innocent victims. 

Sports gambling brings harm to those who don’t participate in it by causing financial ruin and fueling domestic violence. As one writer put it, this booming industry’s cost shouldn’t be measured in only dollars and cents. It should be measured in human lives, especially women and children who are dragged against their will into this destructive and addictive behavior. 

Third, sports gambling corrupts sports. People play and watch sports for the athletic competition and team spirit. However, when gambling is introduced, athletes are incentivized to change or even degrade the way they play. Officials are tempted to cheat, and fans forget why they enjoyed a sport in the first place, focusing instead on financial gain. 

Just last year, tennis players, Olympic competitors, and NBA referees were all caught fixing games and matches. In 2023, the NFL suspended five players for gambling-related violations, and one analysis found a 250% year-over-year increase in suspicious basketball matches. Far from improving sports, gambling has undermined trust, integrity, and all the other reasons athletes step onto the court or field. This will only get worse as sports gambling invades more franchises and fan bases. 

The preoccupation with quick cash introduces another game, one that has nothing to do with athletics and everything to do with what the Bible calls “the love of money.” Paul said that the love of money is “the root of all evil.” The way that sports gambling has poisoned sports, addicted users, and wrecked households proves Paul was right. This national experiment with sports gambling has failed, and it’s time to end it. There’s nothing harmless about playing with people’s lives. 

So, the next time someone says, “Sports gambling is harmless fun. It shouldn’t be regulated,” remember these three things: Sports gambling is addictive and destroys lives; sports gambling victimizes the innocent; sports gambling corrupts sports. 

To see and share this video, visit the What Would You Say? channel on YouTube. You’ll also find dozens of other helpful videos on a variety of difficult topics.

Copyright 2025 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

Federal Judge Blocks Safeguards Designed to Prevent Petition Fraud in Arkansas

Last week U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks in Fayetteville blocked a slate of anti-fraud safeguards the Arkansas Legislature enacted regarding the ballot initiative process.

The order specifically affects the following laws:

  • Act 602 of 2025 by Rep. Ryan Rose (R — Van Buren) and Sen. Mark Johnson (R — Little Rock) requiring ballot initiative titles to be written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. A ballot title is supposed to accurately summarize a measure so voters can decide if they support or oppose it.
  • Act 241 of 2025 by Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) and Rep. Kendon Underwood (R — Cave Springs) requiring petition canvassers to file an affidavit with the Secretary of State verifying the canvasser complied with the Arkansas Constitution and all laws concerning canvassing, perjury, forgery, and fraud.
  • Act 453 of 2025 by Rep. DeAnn Vaught (R — Horatio) and Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) requiring petition canvassers for ballot measures to be Arkansas residents who actually live in the state.
  • Act 218 of 2025 by Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) and Rep. Kendon Underwood (R — Cave Springs) requiring canvassers to inform people that petition fraud is a crime before obtaining their signatures on a petition. 
  • Act 240 of 2025 by Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) and Rep. Kendon Underwood (R — Cave Springs) requiring canvassers to verify a person’s identity via photo ID before obtaining the person’s signature on a petition to help prevent people from fraudulently signing someone else’s name.
  • Act 274 of 2025 by Sen. Kim Hammer (R — Benton) and Rep. Kendon Underwood (R — Cave Springs) requiring people to read the ballot title – which is a summary of the measure – before signing a petition.

Judge Brooks’ decision effectively gives wealthy special interests a clear path to circulate petitions for deceptive ballot measures in Arkansas.

We have written repeatedly about how Arkansas’ ballot initiative process has become the opposite of what it was intended to be.

The Arkansas Constitution lets canvassers circulate petitions to place measures on a general election ballot. Its original intent was to give citizens a way to function as a “legislative body.” But instead of giving everyday people a way to enact their own laws, special interests have hired people to circulate petitions to place misleading, deceptive, and poorly written measures on the ballot in Arkansas.

Last spring Arkansans testified in legislative committees about petition canvassers allegedly trying to provoke altercations and encouraging people to sign petitions multiple times.

Canvassers for the Arkansas Abortion Amendment allegedly were promised $500 bonuses for “altercations” with pro-lifers.

In response, Arkansas’ legislators passed good measures this year to tighten the ballot initiative process. Now those laws are being blocked in court.

Judge Brooks’ decision is not the final word in the matter. We believe our federal courts ultimately will uphold these good laws as Judge Brooks’ decision is appealed.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

HHS Report Confirms Sex-Change Procedures Harm Children

On November 19, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a peer-reviewed report confirming what most Americans already knew: Sex-change procedures are dangerous for children.

The report reviewed evidence and best practices for treating children and adolescents with gender dysphoria.

The HHS report found that performing sex-change surgeries on children or giving children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones carries risk of “significant harms including infertility/sterility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone density accrual, adverse cognitive impacts, cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorders, psychiatric disorders, surgical complications, and regret.”

The report also noted that pro-LGBT groups actually manufactured much of the so-called “medical consensus” in favor of these sex-change procedures, writing:

U.S. medical associations played a key role in creating a perception that there is professional consensus in support of pediatric medical transition. This apparent consensus, however, is driven primarily by a small number of specialized committees, influenced by WPATH. It is not clear that the official views of these associations are shared by the wider medical community, or even by most of their members. There is evidence that some medical and mental health associations have suppressed dissent and stifled debate about this issue among their members.

This latest report adds to a growing body of evidence that shows sex-change procedures hurt children.

Public health experts and policymakers in the U.S.the U.K.SwedenFinland, and other nations have found that science simply does not support giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to kids.

Whistleblowers have come forward to testify about how they were rushed through gender transitions as children without understanding the procedures’ risks, consequences, or alternatives. It is absolutely vital that Americans understand just how harmful these procedures are.

In January, President Trump issued an executive order prohibiting federal funding from being used for sex-change procedures on kids, and the federal government is soon expected to propose new rules that could help protect children from sex-change procedures nationwide.

Earlier this summer, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a public inquiry into whether U.S. doctors and clinics may have deceived parents and children about the risks of these procedures. The U.S. Department of Justice also subpoenaed doctors and medical facilities involved in performing sex-change procedures on minors.

In September, the U.S. Department of Justice sent Congress the federal Victims of Chemical or Surgical Mutilation Act. The proposed federal law would generally prevent doctors, hospitals, and clinics from performing sex-change surgeries on children or giving them puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones.

In 2021, lawmakers in Arkansas passed the Save Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act. This good law generally prohibits doctors from performing sex-change procedures on children or giving them puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. The SAFE Act has been upheld in federal court and is protecting children in Arkansas right now.

This latest report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services further shows that lawmakers did the right thing by passing the SAFE Act nearly five years ago.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.