Family Council Joins Coalition in Urging U.S. Supreme Court to Uphold Religious Liberty

On Monday, Family Council joined 31 other organizations in an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to let people of faith live and operate according to their religious convictions.

The case, Miller v. Civil Rights Department, centers on Catherine Miller. Ms. Miller is a Christian, and she owns a bakery in California.

The California Civil Rights Department filed a complaint against her in state court after she declined to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. Although Ms. Miller won at the trial court level, the California appellate court ruled against her. Now she is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her case.

Catherine Miller’s situation is very similar to Jack Phillips’ case in Colorado.

In 2012, Jack Phillips declined a request to bake a custom cake for a same-sex ceremony. Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission targeted Phillips’ Masterpiece Cakeshop under the state’s anti-discrimination law. It took six years of litigation and court hearings for Jack to finally win his case in 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually ruled 7-2 that Jack could not be forced to violate his deeply held religious convictions.

In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that artist Lorie Smith and her studio, 303 Creative, could not be forced to create artwork that violated her religious convictions about marriage.

Arkansas has enacted some of the best protections for religious freedom in the country, but it’s essential for our federal government to uphold and respect the free exercise of religion as well. That is why we hope the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Catherine Miller’s case and support every American’s right to live and operate according to their deeply held religious convictions.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

The Quiet Revival of Gen Z: Guest Column

Back in April, The Bible Society of the U.K. issued a report describing a “quiet revival” across England and Wales. “Church decline in England and Wales has not only stopped,” read the subheading, “but the Church is growing, as Gen Z leads an exciting turnaround in church attendance.” Though the report has its fair share of critics, it launched an essential conversation. 

Last Sunday, James Marriott continued that conversation with an article in the U.K. publication The Times entitled “Full-fat faith: the young Christian converts filling our churches.” Marriott, who labels himself “a dry and desiccated materialist,” described what he called “a comeback for Christianity.” At least part of this comeback is, Marriott thinks, due to a widespread and growing disenchantment with atheism. Once, he wrote: 

[I]t was widely held that the world was soaring ineluctably along an arc of enlightened progress. We were all destined to become richer, more democratic, more just, more rational and more secular. But those optimistic beliefs have been sorely tested in difficult recent years. Anyone tempted to simply dismiss the idea that religion could ever revive may not grasp how dramatically the cultural and economic landscape inhabited by young people has changed. 

Instead of the utopia that was promised, the post-9/11 reality included economic disruption, Covid, wokeness, and thought police. As a result, many young people are rebelling to a more traditional form of the Christian faith. According to Marriott: 

If you’re young, the establishment is obviously secular. Nowadays, it is precisely Christianity’s marginal status that lends it glamour and charisma, comparable perhaps to the appeal of exotic-seeming eastern religions in the 1960s.  

Last week, I spoke about the “quiet revival” in the U.K. with podcaster, author, and apologist Justin Brierley. He was among the first to identify what he called “the surprising rebirth of belief in God.” For example, according to a recent poll of non-Christian, Gen-Z students, 75% said they’d consider attending church if invited. And though church attendance is typically higher on Easter, this past Resurrection Sunday broke records all over Europe. According to one poll, the number of 16– to 24-year-olds in the U.K. attending church at least once a month jumped from 4% in 2018 to 16% in 2024.

There’s still much to learn about this phenomenon, and it remains to be seen how sticky this new-found faith will be for these young people raised in such highly secular environments. It’s fascinating how, merely a decade ago, we were focused on the rise of “the Nones,” who often claimed the church had let them down. Today, we are talking about the rise of the religious who were let down by secularism.  

One more factor worth mentioning, as Marriott put it (perhaps channeling John Calvin)— humans are inescapably religious: 

I suspect the supernatural side of life—not much catered for in secular rationalist democracies—is a constant of human nature, even if only for a minority. It has more room for expression now. If man is a religious animal, God may never really be banished. 

Indeed, secularism as a worldview is simply not big enough for the God-shaped hole in the human heart. As more young people realize this, the Church has an incredible opportunity to help them find the One who can. You can hear my entire conversation with Justin Brierley about the “quiet revival” on a special bonus episode of the Breakpoint podcast.

Copyright 2025 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

Political Donations From Nursing Homes Surpass $41K in Arkansas

Data from the Secretary of State’s campaign finance website shows that an organization representing the nursing home industry in Arkansas has made more than $41,000 in campaign contributions this year.

The Arkansas Health Care Association — which receives monthly dues from nursing homes in the state — is the state’s largest organization of long-term care providers. In the past, the organization has supported “tort reform” measures limiting the amount of money judges and juries can award in lawsuits when a person is injured or killed due to someone else’s negligence.

So far this year, the Arkansas Health Care Association’s political action committee has provided $41,634.60 in support to nearly two dozen candidates and political committees in Arkansas.

Family Council has never opposed responsible lawsuit reforms, but we have written repeatedly about the unintended consequences of the kinds of measures the nursing home industry has promoted in Arkansas.

For example, in 2017 lawmakers proposed an amendment capping noneconomic and punitive damages in personal-injury lawsuits.

Under that proposal, noneconomic damages could have been capped at $500,000 for injury or death, and punitive damages would have been limited to three times the noneconomic damages. That may sound like a lot of money to some people, but it’s not much compensation for the loss of a human life.

The measure also let lawmakers restrict evidence that could be used in personal-injury lawsuits.

Similar measures have been proposed since then.

As we and others have said over the years, restricting lawsuits makes it difficult or impossible to hold bad actors accountable if a nursing home resident is injured or killed because the nursing home was negligent or didn’t properly care for her. Placing arbitrary limits on the amount of money judges and juries can award to victims of negligence effectively puts a price tag on human life.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.