Outsourcing Discernment in An Age of Mass Information: Guest Column

Elon Musk recently found himself fighting the government of Brazil after his X social media platform was briefly banned there. Ironically, the censorship was marketed as a defense of democracy, i.e. the government “graciously” stepping in to save the people and the voting process from harmful disinformation. 

Of course, claims of disinformation is a common tactic often employed by the powerful to silence critics. Once limits are placed on what can be written and spoken, many other liberties are at risk. Indeed, there are real dangers of an unchecked flood of information, too. In the introduction to Amusing Ourselves to DeathNeil Postman described this tension by comparing Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984

Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. 

In the end, the explosion of information everywhere, all the time, has made us believe everything and nothing at all.  

And our reputation precedes us. There’s been understandable concern about Russian interference in the last few U.S. Elections, but their strategy reveals as much about us as it does them. Imagine a group of operatives from Moscow planning and scheming how to dismantle America, and finally one of them announces, “I’ve got it! Memes! We’ll use memes to interfere with their democracy.”  

Of course, it’s far more serious and strategic than that. In fact, it’s even more troubling how the interference from our international enemies resembles so closely the behavior of social media giants like Facebook and legacy media outlets. Shutting down conversations they don’t like and highlighting narratives they do is not the free exchange of information. 

Over 30 years ago in First Things, C. John Sommerville wrote an article entitled “Why the News Makes Us Dumb.” His answer was that the very idea of “news,” as the name suggests, prioritizes novelty. To stay in business, the media “have to make each day’s report seem important, and you do this primarily by reducing the importance of its context.”  

If we read philosophy, history, science, theology—regularly—we would be able to make much better sense of the day’s events. But we don’t. We’re too busy to manage anything but the News. 

Sommerville wrote this before the internet was much of a thing and social media even existed. At the time, he was complaining about archaic things called “newspapers,” but his concerns proved prophetic. If people were “too busy to manage” one daily news reading back then, how can we possibly make sense of news firing at us all the time and from every direction now? The answer is, we don’t. In fact, many don’t even try. We prefer our “news” pre-digested and delivered to our feeds. In other words, we have outsourced the hard work of discernment to others. 

Two-thirds of Americans get at least some of their news from social media, especially Facebook. Nearly three-quarters of X users rely on that platform for news. When Americans say they rely on “multiple sources,” they typically mean multiple social media sites, not a combination of traditional media and social media sites, or sources from multiple perspectives. 

If Americans weren’t regularly reading “philosophy, history, science, theology” in 1991, it’s even worse today. In 1990, 16% of Americans hadn’t read a single book in the previous year. In 2015, it was 27%. Last year, it was 65%. Most of what was read isn’t helpful anyway. According to USA Today, between 1993 and 2013, the best seller lists were dominated by self-help and young-adult fiction. Today, people are mostly just reading their phones

In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman presciently warned of a “vast descent into triviality.” Christians, because they believe that Christ is the truth and the Word, should always prioritize discernment, but especially in the information age. Otherwise, we risk being tools in somebody else’s arsenal.

Copyright 2024 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

Face to Face: Abortion Providers Meet Women Who Regret Their Abortion

The following is from our friends at Live Action:

In this groundbreaking roundtable, women with abortion regret meet former abortion providers face-to-face in an emotional and unfiltered conversation. Join Lila Rose for this eye-opening dialogue that brings together survivors, former providers, and women who have experienced the pain of abortion regret. Watch powerful stories from all perspectives on the realities and aftermath of abortion in this thought-provoking and deeply personal discussion.

Arkansas State Police Intercept 136 Pounds of Illegal Marijuana from Oklahoma in a Single Traffic Stop

Last week Arkansas State Police seized more than 100 pounds of illegal marijuana in a single traffic stop.

The marijuana apparently was being transported through Arkansas from Oklahoma to be sold on the black market elsewhere in the country.

In a statement, the Arkansas State Police said,

On Thursday, October 3, 2024, around 9:38 p.m., Arkansas State Police (ASP) Troopers stopped a rented black 2024 Chrysler Pacifica on Interstate 40 Eastbound at the 159-mile marker for a traffic violation.

Troopers searched the vehicle and found five large trash bags in the rear of the vehicle filled with approximately 136 pounds of individual vacuum-sealed packages of illegal marijuana.

ASP arrested the driver, Hui Zhang, 34, of Flushing, NY, and transported her to the Pulaski County Detention Center, where she was booked and charged with felony Possession with the Purpose to Deliver a Controlled Substance, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, and Criminal Use of Property.

Zhang told investigators she was traveling from Oklahoma to South Carolina.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Authorities patrolling I-40 in Arkansas routinely intercept marijuana that is bound for the black market elsewhere around the country.

We have written time and again about how marijuana’s legalization in other states has actually emboldened drug cartels and organized crime.

Some of these illegal marijuana operations are tied to labor trafficking and violent crime, and some have connections to foreign interests like the Chinese Communist Party.

A CBS News segment last year highlighted how Chinese investment is driving illegal marijuana production across the U.S., and CBN reported last October that Chinese investors with “suitcases full of cash” are buying U.S. farmland to grow black market marijuana. Other correspondents have reported how these illegal marijuana operations contribute to “modern day slavery on American soil.”

Stories like these have significant implications for Arkansas, where the group Arkansans for Patient Access is working to pass Issue 3, an amendment drastically expanding marijuana in the state.

The amendment would give free marijuana cards to immigrants and out-of-state residents who come to Arkansas to use marijuana.

Issue 3 would guarantee marijuana growers and sellers a monopoly over the state’s marijuana industry.

Under this measure, marijuana users would no longer need to show they suffer from a specific medical condition listed in state law — making it easier to use marijuana recreationally.

Issue 3 also fails to limit the amount of THC in marijuana products, and it repeals restrictions designed to protect children from marijuana advertising.

All of this would lead to more marijuana in Arkansas.

Family Council Action Committee has materials available for volunteers and churches regarding the marijuana amendment:

You can learn more at FamilyCouncilActionCommittee.com.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.