Washington State’s Hotline to Report “Hate”: Guest Column

Late last month, Washington State Governor Jay Inslee signed a bill to create a state-run hotline so that residents can report “hate crimes” and “bias incidents.” Such “crimes” and “incidents” include noncriminal activity like refusing to use someone’s pronouns or accidentally misgendering a person. No evidence is required to report someone. 

Proponents of the bill say that the hotline is necessary for members of marginalized communities who “might be afraid to contact police.” In reality, it will pit members of the community and, potentially, families against one another and could mobilize police and Child and Family Services to violate families and enforce radical and dangerous ideas about sex and gender.  

Tragically, Washington is the state most impacted by retail theft, among other crimes. What residents there really need is legal and police reform to protect their safety and uphold their freedoms.

Copyright 2024 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

Updated: Arkansas House of Representatives Passes Bad “Hate Crimes” Measure

On Monday the Arkansas House of Representatives passed S.B. 622, a bad bill widely being referred to as a “hate crimes” measure. The measure passed by a vote of 65 to 26. The bill previously passed the Arkansas Senate.

As we have written repeatedly, S.B. 622 is so ambiguous that it’s impossible to know just how far-reaching this legislation may be.

The bill fails to define crucial terms like ‘recognizable and identifiable.’

Its protections for religious liberty are inadequate.

It does not contain sufficient safeguards to prevent cities and counties from enacting their own, more stringent hate crimes ordinances.

It does not do enough to protect free speech or prevent thought-policing.

The bill now goes to Governor Asa Hutchinson.

Below is a breakdown of the vote on S.B. 622.

Voted FOR S.B. 622

  • F. Allen
  • Barker
  • S. Berry
  • M. Berry
  • Boyd
  • Bragg
  • Breaux
  • Brooks
  • Brown
  • Cavenaugh
  • Christiansen
  • Coleman
  • Cozart
  • Dalby
  • Deffenbaugh
  • Dotson
  • Eaves
  • Eubanks
  • Evans
  • K. Ferguson
  • D. Ferguson
  • Fielding
  • C. Fite
  • L. Fite
  • Fortner
  • Gonzales
  • M. Gray
  • Haak
  • Hawks
  • Hillman
  • Holcomb
  • Hollowell
  • Jean
  • Jett
  • L. Johnson
  • Ladyman
  • Lundstrum
  • Lynch
  • Maddox
  • Magie
  • McClure
  • McCollum
  • M. McElroy
  • McGrew
  • McNair
  • S. Meeks
  • Milligan
  • Nicks
  • Penzo
  • Perry
  • Pilkington
  • Richmond
  • Rye
  • Shepherd
  • Slape
  • S. Smith
  • Tollett
  • Tosh
  • Underwood
  • Vaught
  • Wardlaw
  • Warren
  • Watson
  • Wing
  • Wooten

Voted AGAINST S.B. 622

  • Bryant
  • Carr
  • Cloud
  • Clowney
  • A. Collins
  • Crawford
  • Ennett
  • V. Flowers
  • D. Garner
  • Gazaway
  • Godfrey
  • M. Hodges
  • Hudson
  • Love
  • Lowery
  • McCullough
  • McKenzie
  • Miller
  • Ray
  • Richardson
  • Scott
  • B. Smith
  • Speaks
  • Springer
  • D. Whitaker
  • Womack

Voted “Present”

  • Beatty Jr.
  • Bentley
  • C. Cooper
  • J. Mayberry
  • Murdock

Did Not Vote

  • Beck
  • M. Davis
  • Furman
  • Payton

House Committee Passes Bad “Hate Crimes” Bill

On Thursday the Arkansas House Judiciary Committee passed S.B. 622, a bad bill widely being referred to as a “hate crimes” measure.

As we have written repeatedly, S.B. 622 is vague and subjective.

The bill is so ambiguous that it’s impossible to know just how far-reaching this legislation may be.

S.B. 622 fails to define important terms like ‘recognizable and identifiable.’

Its protections for religious liberty are not adequate.

It does not contain sufficient safeguards to prevent cities and counties from enacting their own, more stringent hate crimes ordinances.

It does not do enough to protect free speech or prevent thought-policing.

The bill now goes to the entire Arkansas House of Representatives for consideration.