Department of Education Tells Homeschoolers New EFA Rules Don’t Have to be Fair

The Department of Education disregarded concerns that Arkansas’ homeschoolers repeatedly expressed about new Educational Freedom Account (EFA) rules, according to documents Family Council obtained via the Freedom of Information Act.

Lawmakers created the EFA program in 2023, making it possible for Arkansas’ students to use public funds to pay for an education at a public or private school or at home. Thousands of students have taken advantage of school choice in Arkansas under this program, and many homeschool families have benefited from it.

But late last year, the Arkansas Department of Education began developing new administrative rules for the EFA program restricting how EFA funds could be used — especially when it came to athletic activities.

Homeschool families and organizations began voicing concerns about how the rules would prohibit EFA spending on many team sports while still letting private schools and public schools spend public tax dollars and EFA funds on school athletics.

Family Council and the Education Alliance offered changes to the rules, but the latest version of the rules still prohibits EFA funds from being used for team sports that require tryouts or limit participation based on ability.

The rules still establish new categories and restrictions on educational expenses, and they still reduce the maximum balance families can carry in their EFA accounts.

Family Council recently sent a Freedom of Information Act request asking for copies of public comments Arkansans submitted regarding the new EFA rules. In response, our office received more than 700 pages of documents containing comments homeschoolers have made since November regarding the rules.

The overwhelming majority of these comments express concerns about how the new rules would go beyond state law and hurt homeschoolers participating in the EFA program.

One family shared about how the rule change would hamper their daughter’s ability to participate in gymnastics, writing:

To share a personal example, my daughter has been involved in gymnastics since she was 2 years old and is now 6. This past year, she was able to move up based on her skill level and participate in league competitions at her gym. Since then, I have watched her confidence grow tremendously. She has become more disciplined, motivated, and proud of what she can accomplish. She currently trains three days a week and truly loves the sport.

Gymnastics, by nature, requires evaluation and placement for both safety and proper development. Advancing levels or making a team is not about exclusion—it ensures children are placed where they can safely learn and succeed. She is now working toward making the competitive team, which would allow her to compete across Arkansas. Opportunities like this would not be financially possible for our family without EFA support.

What is most concerning is the inconsistency this creates when compared to public school opportunities. Public schools use taxpayer funds to support extracurricular athletics such as basketball, volleyball, and cheerleading—many of which require tryouts and limit participation based on ability. Students who make those teams are supported using public funds. Under the proposed changes, however, families who have chosen alternative education paths would be denied access to similar opportunities simply because those programs involve evaluation or selection.

This creates an inequitable situation and contradicts the purpose of the EFA program, which is to expand educational freedom and allow families to make the best choices for their children.

In response, the Department of Education wrote: “The division respectfully rejects the premise that the goal of the EFA program in the homeschool context is or should be to provide equity between public or private schools and homeschooling.”

The department wrote the same thing to at least 30 other homeschool families who expressed similar concerns.

In other words, the Department of Education does not believe that the EFA rules have to treat homeschoolers fairly.

Arkansas law lets homeschooled students like this one spend no more than one-fourth of their EFA money on extracurriculars like gymnastics. The new rules go beyond state law by prohibiting this type of spending altogether. Meanwhile, private schools who participate in the EFA program and public schools who receive state funds are free to spend money on these types of programs.

We are urging homeschoolers across the state to ask their lawmakers to make sure the new EFA rules are fair to homeschool families.

If you need help finding contact information for your state senator and state representative, please contact our office, and we will be happy to help you.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Arkansans Wagered $86.5M+ on Sports Betting in March

Arkansans wagered more than $86.5 million online in sports betting last month, according to reports from the Department of Finance and Administration.

Sportsbooks are now legal across most of the country, including Arkansas. Earlier this year the Arkansas Racing Commission approved sports betting license applications by FanDuel and DraftKings. State financial data shows that between the NCAA March Madness tournament and these new online sportsbooks, sports betting spiked by millions of dollars last month.

But this type of gambling is taking a terrible toll on families’ finances. Studies indicate people who gamble on sports may be twice as likely to suffer from gambling problems. When sports gambling happens online, the rate is even higher.

A study by Northwestern University found that for every dollar spent on sports betting, household investment falls by an average of $2. Researchers at UCLA estimate that online sportsbooks are linked to an increase of roughly 30,000 more bankruptcies per year nationwide.

Some online sportsbooks have actually produced advertisements that seem to promote compulsive gambling and other problem-gambling behavior.

In 2023, FanDuel released one commercial that showed people so focused on sports betting that they ignored everyone else around them.

Another ad promoted taking advantage of every opportunity to gamble.

In 2024, FanDuel aired commercials encouraging people to gamble on “surprising” hunches — including powerful hunches that strike between football plays.

More recent commercials advertise “playoff mode” with promotional offers such as $300 in “bonus bets.”

Gamblers who ignore loved ones, wager nonstop, or place bets “on a hunch” quite possibly suffer from gambling addiction, and high-end promotional offers may appeal to people who struggle with gambling problems.

Sports betting is out of control. It’s corrupting sports, and it’s ruining lives. The NFL and sportsbooks have actually faced lawsuits over the harm from gambling addiction and in-game micro-bets.

As powerful corporations try to make gambling part of everyday life, it’s important for Arkansas to protect its citizens and families from predatory gambling. Otherwise gambling addiction will simply continue wrecking lives and hurting families in our state.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

The Crumbling Sham of Trans Medicine

Trans activists loudly claim that medicalizing gender confused youth is “settled science” and saves lives. This is meant to shut down any doubt or debate on this critically important topic. 

Thankfully, a few undeterred scholars are asking important questions and demonstrating just how false trans activists’ claims really are. 

An impressive new Finnish study, published in the Swedish academic journal Acta Paediatrica, is extending the damning conclusions of the UK’s 2024 Cass Review. The report was unequivocal in concluding that the so-called “settled science” of trans medicine “is an area of remarkably weak evidence” and the “reality is that we have no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress.” 

The new Finnish study provides the “good evidence.” Its findings on long-term outcomes, based on extremely strong data sets, don’t bode well for trans activists’ overconfident claims. Finland’s government-run medical system has an extremely rigorous tracking system containing detailed medical and psychiatric records on all citizens dating back to 1994. Drawing from this, the study conducted an analysis of every patient under 23 who attended Finnish gender identity clinics from 1996 to 2019 and compared them with a matched control group.  

This means their study population is uniquely comprehensive—it analyzed the entire gender treatment patient population in the country for years and years. Other studies have only included those who chose to take part, seriously undermining the validity of their claims. The Finnish school system also regularly screens students for mental health disorders. It consists of two timeframes: 1996 to 2010, and 2011 to 2019, the time when those “trans identity” numbers started exploding in many countries, likely from social contagion. 

So, what did this comprehensive Finnish study find? It’s a pretty direct conclusion: The whole basis of transgender ideology and practice is wrong. As the study revealed, “Gender-referred adolescents showed significantly higher psychiatric morbidity than controls,” and severe psychiatric morbidity increased substantially in two-plus year clinical follow-ups. Those who sought gender services in the second, larger cohort “had greater psychiatric needs than earlier cohorts.” 

In fact, these medical researchers state,  

Among adolescents who underwent medical gender reassignment, psychiatric morbidity increased markedly during follow-up—rising from 9.8% to 60.7% in feminizing gender reassignment and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinizing gender reassignment. 

They add,  

After adjusting for prior psychiatric treatment, all gender-referred adolescents had similarly elevated risks of psychiatric morbidity, with hazard ratios approximately three times higher than female controls and five times higher than male controls. 

These findings directly challenge the assumption that gender transition is a natural, harmless occurrence and that taking sex-rejecting hormones and cutting off healthy body parts benefits patients. In fact, the researchers bluntly confess, “This does not support the suggested improvement in mental health after medical GR [gender reassignment].”  

Thus, this research supports previous conclusions that those struggling with gender confusion suffer from other serious parallel psychological comorbidities. A group of Austrian scholars explained in the Archives of Sexual Behavior in 2025 that “gender dysphoric adolescents presenting to specialized gender identity services experience varying degrees of co-occurring mental health problems.”  

They note that 71% of such patients suffer from moderate- to high-distress psychopathology (48% and 23% respectively) while only 29% suffer at low-distress levels. Most of these patients (77%) enjoyed high levels of social support in the midst of their struggles, belying another tired line of gay/trans rhetoric. 

This Finnish study confirms that gender confused patients aren’t otherwise healthy people simply born in the wrong body, and if we just give them what they say they need, all will be well. Doing so actually appears to make things worse.
The Finnish research team, working from the same stellar population sample, also reported two years ago in the British Medical Journal that the “Main predictor of mortality in this population is psychiatric morbidity, and medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk.” The Cass Review came to the same conclusion: “Tragically deaths by suicide in trans people of all ages continue to be above the national average, but there is no evidence that gender-affirmative treatments reduce this.” 

The manipulative claims of trans activists continue to crumble, thanks to carefully done science by honest researchers.

This Breakpoint was co-authored by Glenn Stanton.

Copyright 2026 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.