Family in Our Final Days: Guest Column

In a recent column in the Wall Street Journal, Louise Perry described the death of her beloved grandmother in Australia. Unlike many tragic stories coming out of places like Canada, the Australian government did not treat her like dead weight on the health care system. Rather, the system provided coverage for treating her broken leg, though she did not have much time left. 

Far more important than government support, Perry wrote, was family support. As Perry put it: 

Aging is a cruel process, particularly when you’re forced to go through it alone. During the long hours I spent with my grandmother in the hospital, and especially in the emergency room, I noticed that the other patients were mostly elderly, and often unaccompanied. My grandmother had three children, eight grandchildren, four great-grandchildren (so far), and two younger siblings, which meant that she was never without family help. The same can’t be said for many other elderly people, including up to 40% of nursing home residents in Australia who receive no visitors. 

In a culture facing a demographic winter, it is becoming more obvious that God’s command to “be fruitful and multiply” comes with multi-generational blessings. In retort to an advice columnist who advised a young person should spend time with a 40-something with kids before having any, Perry wrote, “My advice, in contrast, would be to spend some time with childless 80-somethings and see how little fun their lives are.” 

The promise of “living for the moment,” rather than being stuck at home caring for kids, ignores the reality that “the moment” won’t last and death is still inevitable. For years now, Japan has used robots to care for an aging population amidst a shortage of younger care workers. Contrast that cold sterility with what Perry describes with her dying grandmother: relatives surrounded a matriarch with simple acts of love like keeping her dry lips from chapping. She wrote, 

For those entering old age without children, the best case scenario is that dramatic advancements in care robots ride to the rescue. The worst case scenario is that there will be no one to wet their lips as they die, not even a robot. My grandmother’s care might end up representing the high-water mark of what governments can do for their citizens. 

Childlessness affects not only the childless. This is not complicated math. Fewer kids born today means fewer working adults tomorrow to financially provide for a larger number of non-working senior citizens. Even worse, it means fewer people around to provide the vital care many need later in life. If history repeats, in a tragic irony, it will be Christians providing care for those who championed their freedom through childlessness and “death with dignity.”  

Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have victims. The victims of bad ideas are often those who championed them. 

One day, the party will be over, and the lights will go out. It will matter greatly to us, on that day, if we are surrounded by people who love us and whom we have poured our lives into or if we will face that moment alone. It will also matter greatly for the kind of society we want to be. Our choices about having children today will very much shape our personal and collective futures. Let us pray for the will to choose wisely. 

Copyright 2026 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

Canada Stops Short of Allowing Euthanasia Solely for Mental Illness, But Could Still Authorize it for Dementia

The AP reports Canada will not authorize so-called “medical aid in dying” (MAID) for people suffering solely from mental illness, but experts say expansions to the country’s euthanasia laws could authorize it for people with dementia and similar conditions.

When the Canadian Parliament first legalized MAID in 2016, the goal was to let terminally ill people end their lives via assisted suicide. However, since then Canadians have seen the practice expand under a deadly bait and switch.

In the past decade, MAID has claimed an estimated 100,000 lives and now accounts for one in 20 Canadian deaths.

The country was scheduled to expand assisted suicide to include people suffering solely from mental health conditions like anxiety or depression. However, Canadian leaders announced earlier this month that they are abandoning that plan.

While that may be good news, the Daily Citizen reports that Canada plans to introduce legislation this fall that would allow euthanasia by “advance request.”

An advance request would function like an advance directive letting doctors euthanize the patient.

Canadian officials note, “An advance request is a request for MAID made by an individual who still has the capacity to make decisions, before they are eligible or want to receive it. Their intent is that MAID be provided in the future after they have lost the capacity to consent and when certain conditions that they specify in their request are met.”

Zachary Mettler at the Daily Citizen describes how this practice could make it possible for Canada to euthanize people suffering from dementia, writing, “For example, someone in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease could request and be approved for euthanasia by advance request and then be killed later after their condition deteriorates and they can no longer agree to be killed.”

This is exactly the slippery slope that pro-life advocates have warned about for years.

Canada’s definition of who qualifies for assisted suicide is already dangerously broad. Patients can be approved for euthanasia based on cancer, organ failure, or neurological conditions. But they can also be killed for diabetes, chronic pain, hearing problems, or even “feelings of loneliness.”

Just like abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide are murder, and they violate the sanctity of human life.

Being pro-life means believing innocent human life is sacred from conception until natural death. That’s why Family Council has spent years opposing assisted suicide and euthanasia in Arkansas. Canada is a clear example of where euthanasia and assisted suicide lead, and Arkansas would be wise not to go there.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Euthanasia Continues to Devastate Canada

Stories out of Canada continue to underscore how devastating euthanasia has been for people living there and for the nation’s healthcare system as a whole.

The Canadian Parliament first legalized so-called “Medical Aid in Dying” in 2016. The goal was to let terminally ill people end their lives via assisted suicide, but Canadians have since seen the practice expand under a deadly bait and switch.

In the past decade, “Medical Aid in Dying” has claimed an estimated 100,000 lives and now accounts for one in 20 Canadian deaths. Next year, the country could expand assisted suicide to include people suffering solely from mental health conditions like anxiety or depression. Canadian healthcare officials have even suggested euthanasia be extended to “babies from birth to one year of age who come into the world with severe deformities and very serious syndromes.”

Earlier this year, Texas Right to Life shared a sobering story about Kristin, a wife and mother diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer while living in Canada. Canadian healthcare officials told Kristin that assisted suicide was her only option. Instead, Kristin came to the U.S., where she received surgery and aggressive treatments that saved her life.

Over the summer, a story surfaced about a Canadian grandmother euthanized under “Medical Aid in Dying.” The elderly woman reportedly suffered from poor health, including cognitive problems. The grandmother originally said she did not want to die by assisted suicide, but testimony from her family alleges healthcare professionals misled her about the assisted suicide process and did not get final verbal consent to “assisted suicide” before giving her a lethal injection.

When it comes to assisted suicide and euthanasia, the slippery slope keeps slipping.

Assisted suicide and euthanasia devastate families and rob patients of compassionate care.

In the U.S., assisted suicide has been promoted due to its relatively low cost compared to healthcare. In some cases, insurance companies have refused to pay for patients’ medical care, but have offered to cover assisted-suicide drugs.

You cannot put a price tag on human life. Being pro-life means believing innocent human life is sacred from conception until natural death.

Just like abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide are murder, and they violate the sanctity of human life.

That’s why Family Council helped defeat a very bad bill in 2019 that would have let doctors prescribe lethal drugs to patients in Arkansas and two bad end-of-life bills in 2021. These were flawed measures that fundamentally disrespected the right to life.

We plan to continue working with our friends across the state to protect Arkansans from assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.