Fayetteville Public School District Facing Lawsuit for Failing to Respond to Freedom of Information Requests Over Critical Race Theory, LGBT Policies, and More

On Friday attorneys representing a resident of Fayetteville, Arkansas, filed a lawsuit against the Fayetteville Public School District (FPSD) after the district allegedly failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests.

Arkansas’ Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lets citizens request public documents from government entities. The law help provide accountability and transparency in state and local government.

Attorneys representing Fayetteville citizen Ila Campbell in the lawsuit issued a press release, saying,

On June 25, 2021, Attorney Joey McCutchen, joined by Attorney Chip Sexton and Professor Robert Steinbuch, a co-author of The Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (considered by most attorneys to be the definitive treatise on the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act) filed suit in Washington County Circuit Court against the Fayetteville Public School District on behalf of Fayetteville citizen Ila Campbell. The Complaint, brought under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), arises following two separate FOIA requests submitted to the Fayetteville Public School District (“FPSD”) requesting, in part, the District’s equity plan, documentation regarding Critical Race Theory, LGBTQ policies and gender support plans, use of the word “Christmas,” and the Converge Social Justice Consulting Firm. When the FPSD refused to respond to six clearly identified items, the lawsuit was filed.

In regard to the request for the six items, FPSD responded:

“With respect to your request for records under this item, the District has reviewed your request and determined that it is not sufficiently specific to enable the custodian of the records to locate the records with reasonable effort, given that there are over 1,500 staff email accounts. Please consider narrowing this request to include only the District Leadership Team.”

Attorney Joey McCutchen said, “FPSD is playing games and simply avoiding and evading the FOIA by trying to force Ms. Campbell to limit her FOIA request for public documents.” McCutchen also said, “as noted in the Complaint, the Arkansas Supreme Court has made it clear that an entity required to produce public records cannot escape that production by claiming that the response would be broad and burdensome.” The lawsuit notes that the records are available but the FPSD just don’t want to make the effort to produce them.

McCutchen concluded by saying “FPSD behaves as if it owns the governmental entity and that the public works for it – not the other way around.” The lawsuit is filed in front of Circuit Judge John Threet and seeks a hearing to be held within seven days.

A copy of the complaint filed against the Fayetteville Public School District is available here.

Washington County Quorum Court Committee to Take Up Pro-Life Resolution

The Washington County Quorum Court County Services Committee is slated to consider a pro-life resolution on Monday evening at 6:00 PM.

The resolution recognizes “that all men are created equal” and that “Amendment 68 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas makes clear that we are to protect the life of every unborn child.”

The resolution also affirms that Washington County is a Pro-Life County committed to protecting all lives — including the lives of unborn children.

The resolution comes as Planned Parenthood looks to hire new staff in the Northwest Arkansas area.

You can read a copy of the proposed resolution here.

Earlier this year the state legislature passed a law affirming that municipalities in Arkansas can declare themselves Pro-Life.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that municipalities can adopt pro-life policy positions like this resolution.

The City of Springdale adopted a similar pro-life resolution a couple of years ago.

In light of all of this, Washington County is well within its rights to consider this pro-life resolution.

Affirming that cities and counties in Arkansas are Pro-Life is one more way we can continue to foster a culture that values the sanctity of human life.

Satanic Temple Quietly Drops Lawsuit Over Pro-Abortion Billboards — For Now

The Satanic Temple briefly parked a statue of baphomet — a satanic figure — in front of the Arkansas State Capitol Building as part of a demonstration in August of 2018.

Last February the Satanic Temple quietly dropped its lawsuit against Lamar Advertising over a set of pro-abortion billboards that the company rejected in Arkansas.

In September the Satanic Temple sued Lamar Advertising after the company rejected designs for pro-abortion billboards that the Satanic Temple wanted to place near pregnancy resource centers in Arkansas and Indiana.

All of the proposed billboard designs claimed that the Satanic Temple’s “religious abortion ritual averts many state restrictions” on abortion. 

One billboard even claimed pregnancy complications are the sixth most common cause of death among women between the ages of 20 and 34, and concluded that “abortions save lives.”

Understandably, Lamar rejected the Satanic Temple’s billboard designs for being “misleading and offensive.”

After a few months of wrangling in court, the attorney for the Satanic Temple filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. The Circuit Judge of Benton County granted the Satanic Temple’s request to dismiss the lawsuit on February 26.

Dismissing the case without prejudice leaves the door open for the Satanic Temple to refile the lawsuit later. However, so far it seems like the group hasn’t been interested in pursuing a lawsuit against Lamar Advertising any further.

The order to dismiss the lawsuit received very little attention last February. Lamar and the Satanic Temple apparently did not say anything publicly about the decision at the time, and most of us were more focused on the Arkansas Legislature.

But it looks like pro-abortion billboards won’t go up around pro-life pregnancy resource centers any time soon. That’s a good thing.