Arkansas’ SAFE Act Passed One Year Ago Today

Above: Rep. Robin Lundstrum asks the Arkansas House of Representatives to override the governor’s veto of the SAFE Act in this file photo from April 6, 2021.

One year ago today the Arkansas Legislature voted to enact the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act by Rep. Robin Lundstrum (R – Springdale) and Sen. Alan Clark (R – Lonsdale).

The SAFE Act protects children from sex-reassignment procedures, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones.

Here’s a brief recap of the measure’s history and what has happened since its passage:

On February 25, 2021, Rep. Robin Lundstrum (R – Springdale) and Sen. Alan Clark (R – Lonsdale) filed H.B. 1570, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act.

In a nutshell, the SAFE Act prohibits sex-reassignment procedures on children. It also prevents funding of sex-reassignment procedures performed on children.

Gender-reassignment surgeries can leave children sterilized and scarred for life, and medical researchers do not know the long term effects these procedures and therapies can have on kids. That is why many people equate them with experimenting on children.

On March 9, 2021, the SAFE Act passed the House Public Health Committee by a vote of 12 to 2, and it passed the entire Arkansas House of Representatives by a vote of 70 to 22 the following day.

Along the way, pro-LGBT organizations attacked the bill.

The ACLU claimed that the SAFE Act would ban “trans youth from accessing health care and health insurance.”

But groups like the Heritage Foundation pointed out that the SAFE Act does no such thing. The SAFE Act does not deny healthcare to anybody. It simply prohibits healthcare providers from performing or paying for sex-change procedures on children.

The Senate Public Health Committee passed the SAFE Act on Monday, March 22, 2021, and the full Arkansas Senate passed it the following week by a vote of 28 to 7.

Rev. Franklin Graham, Tony Perkins from Family Research Council, and the Heritage Foundation all issued statements supporting the SAFE Act.

However, Governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the SAFE Act on April 5, 2021.

The following day — on April 6 — the Arkansas House and Arkansas Senate overwhelmingly voted to override the governor’s veto.

The SAFE Act was officially slated to take effect in July of 2021. However, the ACLU indicated in May that it would challenge the SAFE Act in court.

Meanwhile, on May 5 a major hospital in Sweden announced it would no longer give puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children under the age of 16, and that giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children ages 16 – 18 “should be regarded as experimental.” This echoed what many experts said during the debate surrounding Arkansas’ SAFE Act.

The ACLU filed the lawsuit over the SAFE Act on May 25, 2021.

On June 17 the Biden Administration weighed in against the SAFE Act, and six business organizations filed an amicus brief opposing the SAFE Act on July 2.

July 21, 2021, U.S. District Judge James Moody temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the SAFE Act while the lawsuit progresses.

On August 20 Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge asked the Eighth Circuit to lift Judge Moody’s order so that the state could start enforcing the law right away. That appeal is pending in federal court.

Meanwhile, the lawsuit over the SAFE Act’s constitutionality is still in Judge Moody’s court.

On February 28, 2022, the U.S. District Court in Little Rock announced the SAFE Act would go to trial sometime during the week of October 17, 2022. The court had previously scheduled the trial to take place during the week of July 25, 2022, but apparently chose to reschedule it.

Arkansas’ SAFE Act protects children.

Gender transition procedures, puberty blockers, and hormone replacements can sterilize children and leave them permanently scarred. The Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act protects children from these procedures.

We believe federal courts ultimately will recognize that fact and uphold this good law as constitutional.

Abortion Facility Owner’s Trial in Assault Case Moved to July

On Tuesday the court in Little Rock granted a continuance in abortion facility owner Natalie Tvedten’s assault case, according to information posted online from Arkansas’ Administrative Office of the Courts.

Tvedten’s attorney did not immediately respond to an email request for comment.

According to court documents from 2020, Tvedten is one of the owners of Little Rock Family Planning Services, a surgical abortion facility in Little Rock.

The Little Rock Police Department’s warrant and arrest report in the case indicates that Tvedten faces two counts of Assault in the First Degree for allegedly trying to strike pro-lifers with her vehicle while they prayed on the public easement outside the abortion facility on July 13, 2021.

Tvedten’s new court date is set for July 6, 2022.

Family Council has collected Little Rock Police reports documenting multiple close calls that pro-lifers have had with vehicles outside the surgical abortion facility.

Below is video footage of the the alleged July 13 incident that Family Council obtained last year via Arkansas’ Freedom of Information Act.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

Family Council Plans to Educate, Equip Voters on 2022 Religious Freedom Amendment

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Little Rock, Ark. – On Tuesday, Family Council unveiled a three-pronged strategy for educating Arkansans about a proposed amendment that adds protections for religious liberty to the state’s constitution.

Family Council President Jerry Cox released a statement, saying, “Religious liberty is on the ballot in Arkansas this November. Last year, three-quarters of the State House of Representatives and the State Senate voted to place the Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment on the 2022 ballot. In addition to protecting the freedom to worship at a church, synagogue, or mosque, it protects people’s right to peacefully live, speak, and act according to their sincerely-held beliefs. Over the next seven months, Family Council plans to conduct a statewide campaign to educate voters about this proposed amendment to the state constitution. Arkansans need to be able to make an informed decision when they vote this November. We intend to help them do that.”

Cox said Family Council has a three-pronged strategy for educating Arkansans about the amendment. “Our grassroots campaign will consist of three parts. First we are going to inform and activate our existing network of nearly 7,000 households and churches. Second, we plan to work with other like-minded state and national organizations to help them inform and activate people in their spheres of influence. And third, we intend to conduct an extensive earned-media campaign consisting of Arkansas TV, radio, and newspaper as well as a strong online presence. We don’t know of any groups planning to oppose the amendment. If opposition to the amendment develops, we may work with churches to raise funds for a statewide paid-media campaign as well.”

Cox highlighted some of the information that Family Council will share with voters about the proposed amendment ahead of the November election. “The Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment amends the Arkansas Constitution. The measure is similar to a state law that Governor Hutchinson signed in 2015. It would help ensure that state and local laws won’t interfere with the free exercise of religion. It outlines some of the steps Arkansans can take if the government infringes their religious liberty. And it contains exceptions for situations where a compelling government interest is at odds with religious liberty. Those are examples of the kind of information we plan to share with voters between now and November 8.”

###

Read More About the Proposed Amendment Here