14,000 Children Are Forever Harmed: Guest Column

We now have numbers for the push to transgender a generation.

According to the new bombshell report from the group Do No Harm, nearly 14,000 minors underwent transgender surgeries, took puberty blockers, or were given cross-sex hormone injections, between 2019 and 2023. This report directly counters a refrain often thrown at anyone who expressed concern for the wellbeing of children, that “it’s just not happening.” In fact, just three months ago, researchers at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health announced that “gender-affirming” surgeries were “rarely performed on transgender youth in the U.S.”  

Rare, however, is the wrong word for 14,000 youth. As Dr. Miriam Grossman, my guest on a Breakpoint Forum earlier this year, told Washington Watch,  

This release of data is really a nuclear bomb. … We are led to believe by politicians and by many groups that these interventions are very rare and hardly happening at all in this country. And that is simply not true. 

Indeed. According to the Do No Harm report, just under 14,000 children received transgender-related treatments. More than 5,700 of those treatments were “sex change” operations and more than 62,000 hormone and puberty blocker prescriptions were written in that time frame. These numbers do not include young people who underwent some form of “social transition.” 

When these treatments, which go under the misnomer “gender-affirming care,” are carried out on children, the consequences are severe, and often irreversible. As the Cass Review (a comprehensive report out of the U.K. on “gender services” for children) revealed, doctors who recommended and administered these “treatments” knew of the risks of complications. These risks include pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic floor dysfunction, and pain during any kind of arousal or sexual intercourse. Others saw no issues continuing “treatments” on those who showed serious co-morbidities, including mental health issues. According to one doctor: “The mere presence of psychiatric illness should not block a person’s ability to start hormones.” Another “referred for genital surgery people diagnosed with major depressive disorder, c-PTSD, and who are homeless.” Most troubling is that clinicians and activists from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) have openly admitted that minors cannot fully understand what’s at stake in these “treatments,” especially the permanent damage done to their ability to have children in the future.  

In fact, for years, activists have pushed these chemical and surgical interventions on children and their parents by threatening them. “Would you rather have a dead daughter or a live son,” parents are asked, as if anything less than their full affirmation will lead their child to commit suicide. This is a manipulative myth. According to one study published earlier this year, those who undergo so-called “gender transition” surgery are over 12 times more likely to commit suicide than those who do not.   

Although the effects of surgery and puberty blockers on children can never be reversed, almost always a child with gender dysphoria grows out of those feelings by the time they hit their mid-twenties. Puberty, it turns out, is quite effective in aligning one’s internal sense of self with the realities of the body. As the authors of landmark research out of the Netherlands wrote, “Gender non-contentedness, while being relatively common during early adolescence, in general decreases with age and appears to be associated with a poorer self-concept and mental health throughout development.”

Ideas have consequences, and bad ideas have victims. This report from Do No Harm reveals that there have been victims of trans ideology, and many of them have been children. This is an ideology with no basis in medicine, science, or observable realities. And yet, it is an ideology that has given birth to atrocities performed in doctors’ offices and hospitals by “experts” we were supposed to “trust.”  

We shouldn’t have. This ideology shatters the lives of young people and the lives of their parents. Until this report, we didn’t know how many.

Copyright 2024 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Reprinted from BreakPoint.org with permission.

The Multibillion Dollar Socioeconomic Benefit of Churches and Charities in America

We have written over the years about the socioeconomic impact of churches and charities in America.

Nationwide, researchers estimate religion contributes hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. economy. In fact, between churches and charities, religious colleges and universities, and so on, people of faith may provide as much as $1.2 trillion to America.

A 2022 economic impact study on United Methodist churches in rural North Carolina found the churches were responsible for more than $735,000, on average, in economic benefits to their local communities each year.

Most of the benefit comes from the goods, services, and support that these ministries provide, including:

  • Community service
  • Healthcare services
  • Education
  • Childcare
  • Unemployment programs
  • Local economic development
  • Recovery programs for addiction and substance abuse
  • Disaster relief initiatives

Churches and charities are a valuable resource in every community. We want to help Arkansas’ leaders and policymakers understand what these ministries can do for our state.

That is why Family Council launched the Church Ambassador Network initiative earlier this year. The Church Ambassador Network builds relationships between church leaders and elected leaders regardless of their political leanings. We believe churches and elected officials can work together to address many of the problems our communities face.

If you help lead a church or similar ministry in Arkansas, we would invite you to join the Church Ambassador Network for free today.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.

City of Little Rock Authorizes Public Drinking in New Entertainment District Seven Days a Week

On Tuesday the City Board of Directors in Little Rock authorized public drinking in a new, “temporary” entertainment district.

The city’s new resolution allows public drinking at the Breckenridge Village business property in Little Rock seven days a week, from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM through December 31.

The city could extend the temporary, public drinking authorization by passing another resolution in the future.

Act 812 of 2019 let cities create “entertainment districts” where alcohol can be carried and consumed publicly on streets and sidewalks. These districts can be either permanent or temporary under the law.

In 2021 the Arkansas Legislature passed Act 874 letting cities in dry counties authorize public drinking if the city has a private club that serves alcohol within the city limits.

And Act 34 of 2023 further expanded public drinking by letting cities and towns without advertising and promotion taxes on hotels and restaurants establish their own entertainment districts.

Family Council strongly opposed each of these laws, because of the harm that public drinking causes to communities.

In 2019 El Dorado’s city council voted to authorize public drinking in an entertainment district covering approximately nine blocks downtown.

However, at a meeting last year, El Dorado City Council Member Frank Hash reportedly said that disorderly and unruly behavior had become a recurring problem on the weekends in El Dorado’s public drinking district.

The El Dorado News-Times also wrote that law enforcement has faced challenges policing El Dorado’s entertainment district, and that vandalism, fighting, and other types of disruptive behavior were concerning issues. The city council voted unanimously to shut down El Dorado’s public drinking district in June as a result.

As we have said for years, public drinking is a scourge on the community.

It raises serious concerns about drunk driving and public safety.

Public drinking doesn’t attract new businesses, bolster the economy, or revitalize Main Street. It hurts neighborhoods and families. It simply does not belong in Arkansas’ communities.

Articles appearing on this website are written with the aid of Family Council’s researchers and writers.