Infographic: Abortion Declining in Arkansas

We’ve written repeatedly about how abortion has fallen to historic lows in Arkansas.

Altogether, from 1991 to 2016, abortion in Arkansas fell by 53.4%.

Teen abortion fell by nearly 79% during that same time.

In 2000, the FDA approved RU486, a regimen of drugs used to perform chemical abortions. From 2003 to 2011, the number of chemical abortions performed in Arkansas generally rose. However, since 2011 the number of chemical abortions performed in Arkansas has fallen by 26.7%.

Across the board, abortion is in decline in Arkansas. Below is an infographic highlighting some of these numbers.

 

A.G.’s Office Files Brief Defending Pro-Life Laws in Federal Court

Last week Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s office filed a formal brief defending four of Arkansas’ pro-life laws before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The laws are:

  • Act 45, which prohibits certain abortion procedures—such as D&E abortion procedures—in which an unborn baby is dismembered.
  • Act 733, which prohibits abortions performed due to the baby’s sex. It contains a provision requiring the doctor to request the pregnant woman’s medical records pertaining to her pregnancy history before performing the abortion.
  • Act 1018, which expanded state laws requiring reporting of abortions performed on girls under the age of 17.
  • Act 603, which prohibits biomedical and behavioral research on aborted fetal remains and helps ensure aborted babies will be properly buried or cremated.
  • Act 383, which clarifies that abortion clinics will be inspected at least annually; that the inspections will be unannounced; and that any clinic that fails inspection will have its license to perform abortions suspended immediately.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker blocked all four laws last summer. The A.G.’s office is asking the Eighth Circuit to reverse her order and reinstate these good laws.

Given some of the recent, pro-life victories in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, a good ruling in this case seems likely.

Article Laments Shortage of Abortion Doctors in Arkansas and Elsewhere

This week Think Progress published an article lamenting the shortage of abortion doctors in Arkansas, Kansas, and elsewhere.

The article claims the stigma associated with abortion coupled with the lack of training at medical schools like UAMS is contributing to a decline in doctors who will perform abortions, saying,

The shortage of physicians who perform abortion is particularly acute in the midwest and south. Similar to Kansas, for example, there are about four full-time abortion doctors in Oklahoma. In neighboring Missouri, there are three abortion doctors. Just south of that in Arkansas, where over 1.5 million females live, there are three physicians who perform abortions. Only one performs surgical abortions and the other two perform medication abortions, where women take two drugs to terminate a pregnancy up to 10 weeks.

There are two key points the article fails to adequately consider:

  1. Abortion causes the death of an unborn child. That isn’t a political statement. It is a scientific fact. Abortion is not simply another medical procedure. It ends a human life, and that is the reason so many doctors choose not to perform abortions.
  2. Given that abortion rates are plummeting and that Arkansans generally oppose abortion, it makes sense that the number of doctors performing abortions would decline as well.

The article also misses the mark when describing the circumstances in Arkansas and our state’s pro-life policies.

For example, the article describes the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences as a medical school where abortion is taboo.

However, just 4 years ago Dr. Curtis Lowery, chairman of the OB/GYN Department at UAMS, testified against a pro-life bill Family Council supported during a legislative committee meeting.

And contrary to the article’s claims, in 1997 the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled UAMS could perform abortions, provided state tax dollars were not used to pay for the abortion procedure. Family Council was among the plaintiffs in that lawsuit against UAMS.

The article also says the Arkansas Legislature “has passed the most restrictive abortion policy in the country in recent years.” The article doesn’t say what the “most restrictive policy” is, but here are some of the things Arkansas’ newest pro-life laws do:

  1. Protect babies who survive an abortion;
  2. Prevent Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood;
  3. Ensure women are given adequate information about abortion, including its risks and alternatives;
  4. Require abortion doctors to give women at least 48 hours to review this information before deciding to have an abortion;
  5. Ensure an abortion is not performed on a minor without the consent of a parent or guardian — except in certain circumstances;
  6. Ensure abortion drugs are administered according to FDA protocols
  7. Require abortion clinics to contract with a doctor who has admitting privileges at a local hospital, in case of emergency;
  8. Prohibit abortions performed based on the unborn baby’s sex;
  9. Require doctors to request some of a woman’s medical records before performing an abortion;
  10. Prevent the sale of organs or tissue harvested from unborn babies;
  11. Require abortion clinics to be inspected at least annually, and ensure a clinic that fails inspection does not perform abortions;
  12. Prohibit some abortion procedures in which the unborn baby is dismembered;
  13. Prevent the state from awarding grants to abortion providers;

Does anyone really think a doctor ought to be able to perform an abortion without explaining the procedure to the woman first?

Shouldn’t a woman be given adequate time to consider her options before having an abortion?

And isn’t it reasonable to say abortion clinics ought to be able to pass inspection before doing abortions?

Life News probably said it best:

Abortion is wrong, immoral and reprehensible to all but the most ardent abortion supporters. Even to many who call themselves pro-choice, abortion is something to be avoided. A few doctors like those profiled by Think Progress may be willing to end unborn babies lives, but most realize the truth that the medical profession is about caring, not killing.

Photo Credit: By Rafael Alcarde Palomares (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.